Jeremy Bamber YouTube video suggesting guilt?

[Truth SKR1]

Didn’t Bamber call Sheila ‘a depressive psychopath’ ?

I just used "nutter" because it's a horrible smear and indicative of his hatred, and "psychopath" because it's a huge lie. His use of "depressive" is more subjective and could be claimed.

[Nicholas]

There should be something about that. "For over 3 decades Bamber has perpetuated and promoted myths and lies particularly around Essex Police, his access to information, his wider family and his victims." I want the statements to be short and memorable.

’The 30 plus years innocence fraud of dangerous and diagnosed psychopath Jeremy Bamber’

?

[Nicholas]

Didn’t Bamber call Sheila ‘a depressive psychopath’ ?

I just used "nutter" because it's a horrible smear and indicative of his hatred, and "psychopath" because it's a huge lie. His use of "depressive" is more subjective and could be claimed.

Will your video include reference to Bamber’s alleged violent act of drug/date rape from the year before the murders?

And wasn’t there also a claim made that Bamber had raped Julie?

[Truth SKR1]

I don't know, Nicholas. I'm looking for everyone's help as to whether and what should be in? Can "diagnosed psychopath" be effectively referenced and sourced without the tonne of evidence showing all the traits?

[Nicholas]

Ok I'll make a start. Statement 1)

In 1985 Nevill and June Bamber, their daughter Sheila Caffell, and her twin sons Nicholas and Daniel were found dead, shot 25 times at their farmhouse in Essex. The gun used in the crimes was found lying on Sheila's body.

Have your considered starting your video on Bamber’s guilt by displaying his ‘pattern of behaviour’ ?

[Nicholas]

I don't know, Nicholas. I'm looking for everyone's help as to whether and what should be in? Can "diagnosed psychopath" be effectively referenced and sourced without the tonne of evidence showing all the traits?

Yep

ISpyWithMyEye posted a screen shot of a page from a book which supports this

[Truth SKR1]

Have your considered starting your video on Bamber’s guilt by displaying his ‘pattern of behaviour’ ?

No, I think a statement of the facts is essential to anyone completely new to the case.

[APRIL]

I don't know, Nicholas. I'm looking for everyone's help as to whether and what should be in? Can "diagnosed psychopath" be effectively referenced and sourced without the tonne of evidence showing all the traits?

You might consider reading up on the character traits of a Grandiose Narcissist.

[Truth SKR1]

A page from a book? If it's written by a medical specialist diagnosing Bamber as a psychopath after meeting with him etc, then maybe.

[Truth SKR1]

You might consider reading up on the character traits of a Grandiose Narcissist.

Thanks for the suggestion, April. Although, I'm more interested in his practical manifestation of these traits, his specific actions.

[Nicholas]

Have your considered starting your video on Bamber’s guilt by displaying his ‘pattern of behaviour’ ?

No, I think a statement of the facts is essential to anyone completely new to the case.

Yes I meant a statement of the facts of Bamber’s pattern of behaviour leading up to the murders

[Truth SKR1]

No, I think we should start with facts about his egregious familicide. And even in statement 1 I'm not stating he killed them. The aim is for that to become obvious through sourced facts as we proceed with evidences of guilt. Any other way than starting with the facts of the murders would be presuming people's foreknowledge of the murders.

[Nicholas]

A page from a book? If it's written by a medical specialist diagnosing Bamber as a psychopath after meeting with him etc, then maybe.

It’s a page from a book quoting the psychiatrist who met with and assessed Bamber pre trial

Or this may be of interest https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nf4I1vnv1V8&t

[Truth SKR1]

Thanks for the video will watch that later. Wilkes writes about a comment from a defence team expert saying he had some "traits" of a psychopath. If it's that we can't stretch that to a diagnosis. Wilkes book is also unsourced.

[APRIL]

Thanks for the video will watch that later. Wilkes writes about a comment from a defence team expert saying he had some "traits" of a psychopath. If it's that we can't stretch that to a diagnosis. Wilkes book is also unsourced.

However, it would place him on the psychopathic spectrum.