Channel Five documentary - "Murder in a Small Town"

[faithlilly]

im not talking about the status of their relationship. talking about him not being included or even mentioned in a documentary looking into this case, when his testimonies were some of most crucial evidence in trial. not surprising its the biggest question mark that remains for most people. the supposed private investigators could and should have easily adressed this. it might even have worked in favour of supporting luke innocence dependin on what shane say these days, right?

the money motive from sandra has been apparent since at least when the wronglyaccusedperson "charity" was set up - late 2010, arguably before with books

its no secret miscarriages of justice are money making opportunities for many

What do you think Shane not being included implies? What else could he add that he didn’t say in court?

The rest seems to be just jealous tittle tattle.

[Nicholas]

What do you think Shane not being included implies? What else could he add that he didn’t say in court?

The rest seems to be just jealous tittle tattle.

Explain

[faithlilly]

Explain

You have no real evidence that Sandra has made a bean from this case so anything you say on this subject is simply tittle tattle.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You have no real evidence that Sandra has made a bean from this case so anything you say on this subject is simply tittle tattle.

More delicious irony!

[John]

Do you think Corrine could have been coached before being filmed ?

The actions of those two cops and Scott Forbes most definitely appeared to have been scripted and I’m not alone on this observation

These documentaries take a lot of prep, some scenes might be filmed a dozen times to achieve the right affect.

[John]

completely valid criticism of programme. his testimony was a crucial part of what banged his bro up and it never even got a mention

also makes me why theres now a gofundme for corinne. shane has gone on to be a bit successful and do well for himself. why does the public need to raise money (currently over £6000) for her? shameless

I wondered that myself. Has there been a further estrangement in the family?

Shane Mitchell was warned by the prosecutor in court as to the repercussions of perjury which undoubtedly put the wind up him.  He kept to his version of events though and that was that his younger brother was not at home when he claimed to be. Corinne Mitchell off course was at the caravan park and couldn't corroborate any of it anyway.

Question is, why did he lie?

[John]

Corrine said that SHE was Luke's alibi, but I thought that the reason that Luke was cooking the tea (and burning the pie which his brother didn't smell when he was upstairs having a tug) was that she was working late?

Both episodes were a bit Corrine-heavy    .

She couldn't be his alibi because she was at the caravan office when the murder took place.

[John]

For me it all comes down to what Shane remembers, some say he admitted to Luke not being home that evening, others say he was flustered in court and not able to clearly put his side across. Some say he fully supports Luke behind the scenes, others say he freely admits he believes Luke is guilty. Only Shane can tell us what’s true. I’d love to hear a statement from him, if he supports his brother now would be the time.

I think Shane knew exactly what he was saying because he knew what would happen to him and his career if he was found out telling lies. He has never gone public though and by all accounts keeps a very low profile.

[John]

im not talking about the status of their relationship. talking about him not being included or even mentioned in a documentary looking into this case, when his testimonies were some of most crucial evidence in trial. not surprising its the biggest question mark that remains for most people. the supposed private investigators could and should have easily adressed this. it might even have worked in favour of supporting luke innocence dependin on what shane say these days, right?

the money motive from sandra has been apparent since at least when the wronglyaccusedperson "charity" was set up - late 2010, arguably before with books

its no secret miscarriages of justice are money making opportunities for many

I think it more to do with personal exposure and self promotion.

[faithlilly]

I think it more to do with personal exposure and self promotion.

What do you think Sandra has gained by being so closely connected to the case?

[John]

What do you think Sandra has gained by being so closely connected to the case?

Many grey hairs and a few wrinkles by the looks of it. She has always sought notoriety but all she has achieved is failure. She failed in the Prout murder case and also the Simon Hall murder case. Her arguments were all nonsense, I saw through them at the time. In my opinion she should find a new outlet for her ambitions because she clearly is useless at spotting a false miscarriage of justice case.

Amen. 

[faithlilly]

Many grey hairs and a few wrinkles by the looks of it. She has always sought notoriety but all she has achieved is failure. She failed in the Prout murder case and also the Simon Hall murder case. Her arguments were all nonsense, I saw through them at the time. In my opinion she should find a new outlet for her ambitions because she clearly is useless at spotting a false miscarriage of justice case.

Amen. 

I admire her tenacity. As the song goes, she gets knocked down and she gets up again....and maybe third time lucky, fingers crossed.

[Nicholas]

Many grey hairs and a few wrinkles by the looks of it. She has always sought notoriety but all she has achieved is failure. She failed in the Prout murder case and also the Simon Hall murder case. Her arguments were all nonsense, I saw through them at the time. In my opinion she should find a new outlet for her ambitions because she clearly is useless at spotting a false miscarriage of justice case.

Amen. 

I see you appear to be getting younger John

& I noted what’s his name slipped up today too

[Nicholas]

im not talking about the status of their relationship. talking about him not being included or even mentioned in a documentary looking into this case, when his testimonies were some of most crucial evidence in trial. not surprising its the biggest question mark that remains for most people. the supposed private investigators could and should have easily adressed this. it might even have worked in favour of supporting luke innocence dependin on what shane say these days, right?

the money motive from sandra has been apparent since at least when the wronglyaccusedperson "charity" was set up - late 2010, arguably before with books

its no secret miscarriages of justice are money making opportunities for many

who we’ll be hearing more details about soon I hear 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Many grey hairs and a few wrinkles by the looks of it. She has always sought notoriety but all she has achieved is failure. She failed in the Prout murder case and also the Simon Hall murder case. Her arguments were all nonsense, I saw through them at the time. In my opinion she should find a new outlet for her ambitions because she clearly is useless at spotting a false miscarriage of justice case.

Amen. 

Where does she stand on Bamber?