Sandra Lean to answer questions on Facebook Jibber Jabber at 8pm.

[faithlilly]

Hi Mrs S and thank you for being so honest.  I knew I would get attacked tonight, I've seen it all before. I think the two presenters of the show could hardly keep their faces straight. I had to go in hard and fast in order to get the points across.

I think Sandra will regret calling me a troll.

I’m sorry John but with no context to your questions you really did yourself no favours. Casual listeners would have had no idea what you were talking about.

[Nicholas]

Ended up watching/listening to this on YouTube.

The podcast lads made it very easy for Sandra Lean, and not much was said of note.

The comments feed was much more interesting with names being named re guilt and the alleged confession.

 A question came in near the end asking about LM's DNA being found on Jodi, but being inadmissible, but that question wasn't asked.

The person who asked about a parka felt the the question was deflected.

One things for sure - Sandra Lean and the Mitchells suddenly have a lot of support thanks to this week's documentary.r

That will be down to the ‘illusionary truth effect’ manufactured by the show makers

Unfortunately after tonight’s live Q&A it sounds like Sandra Lean and the Mitchell’s have a lot of questions to answer

[Nicholas]

I’m sorry John but with no context to your questions you really did yourself no favours. Casual listeners would have had no idea what you were talking about.

Not sure why you think this.

People will be asking who ‘John Lamberton’ is and why has Sandra Lean called him a ‘malevolent troll’- it will have sent off alarm bells

It most certainly did me anyway

[DanniCash]

I asked a few questions too. Only one got a waffle of an answer. It would've seemed a strange question to be asked but was very relevant. She waffled a reply which didn't answer the question. Perhaps she realised the angle I was coming from. An important one that didn't get answered and I guess thats because it would show her as a liar. Her and corrine have repeatedly stated that Luke isn't on protection. I said that wasn't true. If she had acknowledged that I may have given her the benefit of doubt. She didn't and I can guarantee he is on protection.  Not acknowledging this gives me no alternative but to question every word that comes out of her mouth.

Do you mean he is on protection in prison?

[Nicholas]

That will be down to the ‘illusionary truth effect’ manufactured by the show makers

Unfortunately after tonight’s live Q&A it sounds like Sandra Lean and the Mitchell’s have a lot of questions to answer

And it’s very possible this will have been picked up by someone from the media and be on tomorrow’s news

[Mrs S]

Do you mean he is on protection in prison?

Yes he is. I can 100% guarantee this

[faithlilly]

Not sure why you think this.

People will be asking who John is and why has Sandra Lean called him a ‘malevolent troll’- it will have sent off alarm bells

It most certainly did me anyway

You’re hardly neutral though.

And yes a few people may google John and see that he claims he is wrongly convicted and perhaps wonder why he is trolling someone who is trying to stop another miscarriage of justice happening. Only those who know the history between John and Sandra will possibly see it as anything else.

[faithlilly]

Yes he is. I can 100% guarantee this

How?

[Nicholas]

You’re hardly neutral though.

And yes a few people may google John and see that he claims he is wrongly convicted and perhaps wonder why he is trolling someone who is trying to stop another miscarriage of justice happening. Only those who know the history between John and Sandra will possibly see it as anything else.

I don’t think it matters whether I’m neutral or not

People will want to know who he is and why Sandra said what she said

Plus John is also known to the Jones family and others linked to the case

[Nicholas]

You’re hardly neutral though.

And yes a few people may google John and see that he claims he is wrongly convicted and perhaps wonder why he is trolling someone who is trying to stop another miscarriage of justice happening. Only those who know the history between John and Sandra will possibly see it as anything else.

Well for me if was a different Sandra Lean on the live Q&A to the Sandra Lean we saw on the 2 part show - although I only watched about 15-20mins

[Mrs S]

How?

I wont disclose how  I know. He most certainly is. The point I'm making is she has lied about that so I question what else is lies that she's saying.

[faithlilly]

I don’t think it matters whether I’m neutral or not

People will want to know who he is and why Sandra said what she said

Plus John is also known to the Jones family and others linked to the case

I’m not sure the point you are trying to make, sorry.

It appeared that apart from a few viewers, those who knew John were basically telling him to be quiet and those who didn’t weren’t enamoured with his performance. Sandra certainly came out of it looking like the adult in the room.

[faithlilly]

I wont disclose how  I know. He most certainly is. The point I'm making is she has lied about that so I question what else is lies that she's saying.

But we only have your word that she lied and unless you can provide proof of what you say I’m afraid I have no reason not to believe her.

[Mrs S]

I don’t think it matters whether I’m neutral or not

People will want to know who he is and why Sandra said what she said

Plus John is also known to the Jones family and others linked to the case

I came over here from the Q&A. Had and still don't know who or what John story is. All I could see from it was he had her rattled and she certainly didn't like his as  I seen valid questions.   

[Mrs S]

But we only have your word that she lied and unless you can provide proof of what you say I’m afraid I have no reason not to believe her.

Thats your perogative.  Believe her.