Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 766159 times)

0 Members and 32 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #420 on: August 03, 2021, 12:22:19 AM »
If you have no proof of anything,  what is the campaign based on?

Can you actually follow a thread because you seem to be having some difficulty following this one.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline rulesapply

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #421 on: August 03, 2021, 12:30:52 AM »
Can you actually follow a thread because you seem to be having some difficulty following this one.

You, yourself, have been no better at keeping on track with, Innocents Betrayed, than I have. The only thing you have done better than me is dodging genuine questions. Why do you know more about AB statements than me? And if you know because of genuine research then I want to know who put AB,'s statement in the public domain because, according to SL,that's a crime.

Offline Hawthorn

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #422 on: August 03, 2021, 12:47:41 AM »
My question to faithlilly/ms.lean
What was the thought prossess using the morbid image of a whilted & dying sunflower on the cover of I.B?
A very beautiful and noble flower that symbolises her life.
Don't you think that's distasteful, even an insult to her memory?

Offline rulesapply

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #423 on: August 03, 2021, 12:50:11 AM »
My question to faithlilly/ms.lean
What was the thought prossess using the morbid image of a whilted & dying sunflower on the cover of I.B?
A very beautiful and noble flower that symbolises her life.
Don't you think that's distasteful, even an insult to her memory?

If I may? There was no thought for Jodi. They had no right.

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #424 on: August 03, 2021, 09:11:48 AM »
Please can we stop the arguing, and the personal remarks, or else I'll have to put my "mod's hat" on again!!

Thanks.

As far as I'm aware, what we know about the case stems from what we have happened to read. There are also some posters on various forums who know the families concerned/live locally. They might know more----on the other hand, they might not. Anyone who was in court for the trial would know more, of course, but I have no idea whether or not this applies to anyone who posts on here.

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #425 on: August 03, 2021, 09:37:34 AM »
My question to faithlilly/ms.lean
What was the thought prossess using the morbid image of a whilted & dying sunflower on the cover of I.B?
A very beautiful and noble flower that symbolises her life.
Don't you think that's distasteful, even an insult to her memory?

As far as I’m aware Dr Lean doesn’t post here and I have no idea why she chose to use that image.

Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #426 on: August 03, 2021, 10:35:38 AM »
As far as I’m aware Dr Lean doesn’t post here and I have no idea why she chose to use that image.


No, I'm fairly certain she does not post here.

Offline rulesapply

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #427 on: August 03, 2021, 10:16:48 PM »

No, I'm fairly certain she does not post here.
That's not what was asked.

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #428 on: August 04, 2021, 02:57:23 PM »
That's not what was asked.

It’s pertinent to the question. How can Dr Lean answer a question in a forum where she doesn’t post? What is the point of asking the question of her?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline rulesapply

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #429 on: August 04, 2021, 11:04:11 PM »
It’s pertinent to the question. How can Dr Lean answer a question in a forum where she doesn’t post? What is the point of asking the question of her?

My reply was to mrswah. As you said, Sandra Lean isn't here, to my knowledge.

Offline rulesapply

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #430 on: August 04, 2021, 11:08:44 PM »
It’s pertinent to the question. How can Dr Lean answer a question in a forum where she doesn’t post? What is the point of asking the question of her?

I didn't ask a question of Sandra Lean. However,  going back, the last question to be asked was not just of Sandra Lean but you too.

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #431 on: August 05, 2021, 05:52:04 PM »
I didn't ask a question of Sandra Lean. However,  going back, the last question to be asked was not just of Sandra Lean but you too.

Asked and answered.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline rulesapply

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #432 on: August 05, 2021, 06:51:25 PM »
Asked and answered.

My question to faithlilly/ms.lean
What was the thought prossess using the morbid image of a whilted & dying sunflower on the cover of I.B?
A very beautiful and noble flower that symbolises her life.
Don't you think that's distasteful, even an insult to her memory?

Offline Hawthorn

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #433 on: August 05, 2021, 07:33:54 PM »
Okay then, i”ll take your word for it that you are not Sandra Lean.
I apologise from my direct assumption.
I will just presume that the rather controversial front cover on the book was an insensitive display of artist licence taken by said author and publisher to promote the damn thing.

It’s just a small blessing that Jodi’s grandmother Mrs.Walker god rest her soul is no longer with us in this world to witness the further pain it has caused her family although i firmly believe her strength,dignity and courage live on in her family and the many other people she helped, who i personally witnessed her great support & kindness being her neighbour for many years.
I hear Jodi was exactly like her in so many good ways.
Such a crying shame.....

Offline rulesapply

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #434 on: August 05, 2021, 07:41:46 PM »
Okay then, i”ll take your word for it that you are not Sandra Lean.
I apologise from my direct assumption.
I will just presume that the rather controversial front cover on the book was an insensitive display of artist licence taken by said author and publisher to promote the damn thing.

It’s just a small blessing that Jodi’s grandmother Mrs.Walker god rest her soul is no longer with us in this world to witness the further pain it has caused her family although i firmly believe her strength,dignity and courage live on in her family and the many other people she helped, who i personally witnessed her great support & kindness being her neighbour for many years.
I hear Jodi was exactly like her in so many good ways.
Such a crying shame.....


I didn't take your question to mean that Faithlilly is Sandra Lean because I don't think so anyway. I took your question to mean, either Faithlilly or SL. It's still a good question to either. The full question, I mean. I'd be interested in seeing it being answered fully.