"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Have any experts read and reviewed IB?

My understanding is that AO first name is not the usual spelling but that is what is used throughout the book. If you can’t get the basics right then what other errors are there?

Why am I not surprised

Do you recall this ⬇️

She was wrong. The print copy had the correct spelling. - Ms Lean went on to say "glad to see that Jane Hamilton has corrected the spelling" - implying after she had pointed it out to her.

As you say ‘what other errors are there’

[Nicholas]

⬇️

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg383172.html#msg383172

"When toxic types can’t control the way you see yourself, they start to control how others see you; they play the martyr while you’re labeled the toxic one. A smear campaign is a preemptive strike to sabotage your reputation and slander your name so that you won’t have a support network to fall back on lest you decide to detach and cut ties with this toxic person. They may even stalk and harass you or the people you know as a way to supposedly “expose” the truth about you; this exposure acts as a way to hide their own abusive behavior while projecting it onto you.

Bringing in the opinion, perspective or suggested threat of another person into the dynamic of an interaction is known as “triangulation.” Often used to validate the toxic person’s abuse while invalidating the victim’s reactions to abuse, triangulation can also work to manufacture love triangles that leave you feeling unhinged and insecure.

1st 8 pages, publishing rights and maps. 4 index. 5 intro. 12 Why bother. 7 background 13 Agreed facts 8 How the stories changed. 6 AW and moped boys. 12 Moped boys. 5 JF and [Name removed]
11 more JF. 9 the mystery deepens SK. 4 stocky man. 1 Parka 10 AB 11 F&W 18 Phone calls. 14 phones. 18 CSM. 11 Evidence (1) 5 Transfer theories. 1 Evidence (2) 3 Luke and forensics. 2 Blood wall scene. 2 Jodi and forensics. 3 toxicology. 10 Parka and log burner. 6 Dalia Manson and sex motivated attack. 12 Mistaken ID. 22 Luke and police. 20 Interrogation (1) 16 Interrogation (2)18 SM and CM. 6 CM. 18 Media. 9 Lie detectors. 5 No similar attacks. 15 SCCRC. 4 Some final thoughts.

Above gives you an idea in sequence of chapters and amount on each. 18 pages on phone calls, mostly irrelevant waffle. The interrogation pages are where most of the verbatim come from, most of that 5% - Selective cherry picking which fills up the pages!


MK and JaF are mixed in at different  points.

I can just imagine the amount of ‘triangulation’ Sandra Lean has used in her 2nd book

[Nicholas]

Have any experts read and reviewed IB?

My understanding is that AO first name is not the usual spelling but that is what is used throughout the book. If you can’t get the basics right then what other errors are there?

And do you recall this ⬇️

Sandra Lean

Media wars are not my thing. Misinformation is not my thing.

(Source for above http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg382996.html#msg382996)

She was wrong. The print copy had the correct spelling. - Ms Lean went on to say "glad to see that Jane Hamilton has corrected the spelling" - implying after she had pointed it out to her.

[Nicholas]

‘Why bother’ ?

Does she have a chapter called ‘why bother’?

Is this where she tells her readers of the amount of years she spent working and campaigning for killer Luke Mitchell ?

[Nicholas]

1st 8 pages, publishing rights and maps. 4 index. 5 intro. 12 Why bother. 7 background 13 Agreed facts 8 How the stories changed. 6 AW and moped boys. 12 Moped boys. 5 JF and [Name removed]
11 more JF. 9 the mystery deepens SK. 4 stocky man. 1 Parka 10 AB 11 F&W 18 Phone calls. 14 phones. 18 CSM. 11 Evidence (1) 5 Transfer theories. 1 Evidence (2) 3 Luke and forensics. 2 Blood wall scene. 2 Jodi and forensics. 3 toxicology. 10 Parka and log burner. 6 Dalia Manson and sex motivated attack. 12 Mistaken ID. 22 Luke and police. 20 Interrogation (1) 16 Interrogation (2)18 SM and CM. 6 CM. 18 Media. 9 Lie detectors. 5 No similar attacks. 15 SCCRC. 4 Some final thoughts.

Above gives you an idea in sequence of chapters and amount on each. 18 pages on phone calls, mostly irrelevant waffle. The interrogation pages are where most of the verbatim come from, most of that 5% - Selective cherry picking which fills up the pages!


MK and JaF are mixed in at different  points.

‘Why bother’ ?

Does she have a chapter called ‘why bother’?

Is this where she tells her readers of the amount of years she spent working and campaigning for killer Luke Mitchell ?

Sandra Lean gave permission for entire chapters of her book ‘No Smoke’ to be copied and posted online - has she given the same permission in her 2nd book IB ?

[rulesapply]

Sandra Lean gave permission for entire chapters of her book ‘No Smoke’ to be copied and posted online - has she given the same permission in her 2nd book IB ?

SL needs help. IMO.

[mrswah]

SL needs help. IMO.

I have never met her, but she does not give me that impression!

[Parky41]

Sandra Lean gave permission for entire chapters of her book ‘No Smoke’ to be copied and posted online - has she given the same permission in her 2nd book IB ?

No, it is the usual copyright status:

[Nicholas]

No, it is the usual copyright status:

I wonder if her and John Morris are ‘thick as thieves’ ?

https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Struck+off+solicitor+was+taken+on+by+law+firm%3B+TRIBUNAL%3A+Swansea...-a088672757

[rulesapply]

I have never met her, but she does not give me that impression!

I disagree, mr apples. I think her history is testament to her present behaviour. Many guilty men defended by SL yet still all guilty so I have to ask myself if this is a Sandra Lean problem?

[rulesapply]

I have never met her, but she does not give me that impression!

Apologies. I meant mrswah not mr apples.

[Nicholas]

Charlatan Sandra Lean has duped many people into supporting her and the psychopathic killer of Jodi Jones

Her 2nd book probably doesn’t even contain enough pages for all the police witness statements 

A brief glimpse at her first book ‘’No Smoke’, which contains a chapter on Joan Albert’s killer, doesn’t include any of this ⬇️

https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/12/19/wrongful-convictions-miscarriages-of-justice-innocence-fraud-whats-the-difference/

And she will have done the same in her 2nd book

What facts? No one's allowed to see any. Very little is in the public domain, according to SL.

And the reason why Sandra Lean and the Mitchell’s keep the case files out of reach from others is because they know they will all be exposed for the liars and manipulators they are

[Nicholas]

Charlatan Sandra Lean has duped many people into supporting her and the psychopathic killer of Jodi Jones

Similar to Stephanie Bon with killer Simon Halls innocence fraud, Sandra Lean uses malicious tactics in an attempt to fool her readers

For example, Sandra Lean* does not explain to her readers why only one of her daughters was living with her, and instead attempts to portray herself in a different, more positive and skewed light, to fool people and draw them in

*Sandra Leans involvement in the innocence fraud campaign of killer Simon Hall will be published in the New Year

Part 1 👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/12/19/wrongful-convictions-miscarriages-of-justice-innocence-fraud-whats-the-difference/

[Nicholas]

What a surprise 🙄

http://www.longroadtojustice.com/

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg448049.html#msg448049

[Nicholas]

Baby killer Billy Middleton on Sandra Lean’s book ‘No Smoke’

7 December 2009
‘This book provides invaluable insight into the British justice system in a manner anyone can understand and everyone should be aware of. Having subsequently met the author I am also aware that the text is not simply an academic viewpoint but a heartfelt and passionate stand-point based on thorough examination of each featured case.
As a result, Sandra Lean has demonstrated not only an ability to highlight the flaws in each case but an awareness of the emotional turmoil experienced by the accused and families alike. A quality so often void from others writing from a purely sterile perspective.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/No-Smoke-Sandra-Lean/product-reviews/1906628009/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_paging_btm_next_2?ie=UTF8&reviewerType=all_reviews&pageNumber=2