"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Ms Lean and CM's "mad theories" have been in abundance for many years, from the early days of "Jigsawman" to the present day. Hardly "new info" Just a new set of people who are not "willfully ignorant" it would seem. The perfect audience - those who do not question the doctrine being pushed out. It really is a "Cult" reincarnation of the old "WAP" forum

And sadly a great deal of brainwashing by the looks of it

‘I am totally mortified you even link suicidal thoughts to being a murderer’

I’ve no idea what Luke Mitchell’s thoughts were or are but not only did he write about suicide when he was 14 or younger he referred to suicide again when he was around 30 years old - to Rozlyn Little in 2018

I find Mitchell’s behaviour extremely telling

The same applies to his mother Corrine

When will she address Luke’s threats of suicide ? His displays of sexual aggression at age 12? His thin skinned and confrontational behaviour ?

[Nicholas]

Ms Lean and CM's "mad theories" have been in abundance for many years, from the early days of "Jigsawman" to the present day. Hardly "new info" Just a new set of people who are not "willfully ignorant" it would seem. The perfect audience - those who do not question the doctrine being pushed out. It really is a "Cult" reincarnation of the old "WAP" forum

Sandra Lean (today)
‘Good morning!!!! I'm sorry about my little outburst last night - there's been so much going on over the last 5 weeks, I've been working long days, every single day, with hardly any time off. To discover last night the size of the trail of sh*t that I'd have to deal with first thing this morning was very, very disheartening. But it's done now - onwards and upwards!!!! Thanks for all your kind messages .

What was her ‘little outburst’ ? Anyone know?

And what’s the ‘trail of sh*t’ she’s referring to?

[Rusty]

'Anyone not taking on all this new info the mistakes etc are being "wilfully ignorant." (Latest Q&A session from Ms Lean)

Ms Lean and CM's "mad theories" have been in abundance for many years, from the early days of "Jigsawman" to the present day. Hardly "new info" Just a new set of people who are not "willfully ignorant" it would seem. The perfect audience - those who do not question the doctrine being pushed out. It really is a "Cult" reincarnation of the old "WAP" forum

"a misplaced or excessive admiration for a particular thing." - most definitely not the truth however.

You are not permitted to ask certain questions, if you do they will be ignored. The faithful will instantly brand you as a "troll"
You're comments will be removed, there is only room - for the "truth" according to their leader.

Doing an amazing job however - the intellect is second to none, exactly what this cult requires for membership.

'trust me mate, av been carrying out interviews these past 48hrs, it was the 4 of them with Cotter as the lookout'
'100% mate trust me' followed by 'tick tock ya beasty b******s'

OR

'there wiz dna o jodies aw over the ootside of the condom' - cracking job, they really are paying attention?


Some of the comments already removed, more so about this very same person maligning SF, can't have that now, keep up the good detective work but please do not speak of my friend in this manner, simply not allowed.

It is extraordinary toxic ain't it. No doubt a lot of the same people(multi accounts) from those WAP days are still lurking about, stirring up the new bottom feeders attracted to this nonsense into a frenzy. Can't debate, so just fling abuse about. I have no idea, how any of this helps Luke's cause. If Sandra had any kind of morality about her, she would distance herself from the toxic behaviour & even promote respectful debate among her new cult followers. But, known her toxic debating skills in the past, it seems like she is quite happy to encourage it. I also encourage anyone on here, to report anything she posts on any social media platforms. This is not about truth and justice, this is about notoriety.

[faithlilly]

It is extraordinary toxic ain't it. No doubt a lot of the same people(multi accounts) from those WAP days are still lurking about, stirring up the new bottom feeders attracted to this nonsense into a frenzy. Can't debate, so just fling abuse about. I have no idea, how any of this helps Luke's cause. If Sandra had any kind of morality about her, she would distance herself from the toxic behaviour & even promote respectful debate among her new cult followers. But, known her toxic debating skills in the past, it seems like she is quite happy to encourage it. I also encourage anyone on here, to report anything she posts on any social media platforms. This is not about truth and justice, this is about notoriety.

It appears that it’s you who is trying to shut down debate but you’re right, this is not about truth and justice. This is about petty vindictiveness.

[Angelo222]

Being a relative newcomer to the case (it's been going for 17+years) it never cease to amaze the venom exuded by many Mitchell supporters in pursuance of their case.

[faithlilly]

Being a relative newcomer to the case (it's been going for 17+years) it never cease to amaze the venom exuded by many Mitchell supporters in pursuance of their case.

Do you have a few examples of this ‘venom’ ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Do you have a few examples of this ‘venom’ ?

There were a couple of Mitchell supporter trolls on here recently who were so rude they got banned, have you forgotten?

[WakeyWakey]

Do you have a few examples of this ‘venom’ ?

2 regular posters on blue forum decided to stop posting and remove accounts recently due to direct death threats and threats to family (which were reported to police)

had implied threats of violence myself over direct message (not on this site)

[faithlilly]

2 regular posters on blue forum decided to stop posting and remove accounts recently due to direct death threats and threats to family (which were reported to police)

had implied threats of violence myself over direct message (not on this site)

How many threats to her safety do you think SL has had or Corrine Mitchell? Not just threats of course...bricks through the car window, caravans being set on fire ? In fact Corrine and Sandra have both been threatened physically by members of Jodi’s family.

This is a case that evokes strong emotions but there is no excuse for threats on any side and any such actions should be thoroughly condemned.

[Vertigo Swirl]

How many threats to her safety do you think SL has had or Corrine Mitchell? Not just threats of course...bricks through the car window, caravans being set on fire ? In fact Corrine and Sandra have both been threatened physically by members of Jodi’s family.

This is a case that evokes strong emotions but there is no excuse for threats on any side and any such actions should be thoroughly condemned.

Serious allegations - were these referred to the police and if so what action was taken against the perpetrators?

[mrswah]

Being a relative newcomer to the case (it's been going for 17+years) it never cease to amaze the venom exuded by many Mitchell supporters in pursuance of their case.

There are rude people on both sides. Same with the Bamber case, and I suspect, with most cases!

[Brietta]

Serious allegations - were these referred to the police and if so what action was taken against the perpetrators?

Very serious allegations indeed although perhaps accusing relatives of the deceased of threatening behaviour is a notch down from accusing them of murder which I believe has happened in the past.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Very serious allegations indeed although perhaps accusing relatives of the deceased of threatening behaviour is a notch down from accusing them of murder which I believe has happened in the past.

I think it still happens, though maybe not on this forum.

[faithlilly]

Very serious allegations indeed although perhaps accusing relatives of the deceased of threatening behaviour is a notch down from accusing them of murder which I believe has happened in the past.

Who’s deceased?

[mrswah]

Very serious allegations indeed although perhaps accusing relatives of the deceased of threatening behaviour is a notch down from accusing them of murder which I believe has happened in the past.

How do you know it didn't really happen?  As far as I'm aware, nobody has accused SL of libel.