Sandra Lean
“The problem with the Forensic results is the number of labs involved and the different labeling protocols used by each. Samples believed to be semen were found on the T-shirt, bra, underpants, trousers, shoe, face, right hand and abdomen. While many of those samples returned "no reportable results," three, labelled "semen," returned mixtures with Jodi and "unknown male(s)" - these were on the t-shirt and the bra.
"
believed to be" - Very much on the same parallel as those multiple DNA partial profiles that were believed to be from LM. Best for Ms Lean to leave that out though?
The problem is Ms Lean? These ones returned as (F) that had Ms Lean scratching her head for many years, right up until 2019, origin of source sex DNA first (F) semen. Not Jodi and unknown male at all, simply Jodi. - Already, no doubt in the book "Innocents Betrayed" - Which speaks volumes across every aspect of what Ms Lean has written and made claim to.
Online gordo30
Senior Member
****
Posts: 699
Re: The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003
« Reply #5493 on: Yesterday at 12:52 PM »
Sandra has never claimed that semen was on the body! Where was it she said that? There is only two full profiles for identified males. The dna is so f..ked up there is even 1 labelled semen female sample!! There are a number of unidentified profiles and the problem with them is there’s no way of knowing how accurate these profiles are unless there matched to an individual, they may be all from the same male that have become contaminated and can be of no use.
"f..ked up" Indeed. Complete lack of knowledge in intricate areas of expertise?
Firstly, thanks to the posters who have clarified the possible (probable?) explanation about the DNA results reporting that sperm and semen samples appeared female in origin. That's very helpful to know - it's been something that's baffled me (as a non-expert) for a very long time.
And for all of those years Ms Lean has punted this type of wrongful/harmful information out - Like "No Smoke" the damage is done, that horse has well and truly bolted. - Does it matter? Not at all, as it still serves that damming repetitive purpose of shifting blame onto 'An another.'
“The wee girl had semen on her face hands trousers trainers T-shirt bra and pants... none of that semen came from Luke Mitchell”
2013
iiHEARTy0u wrote: »
The semen was found on her underwear. He was also one of a few people seen walking on the path.
D2BD wrote: »
Hi iiHEARTyOu, I havent read this before, are you sure SK was seen walking the path? GD and JoF were on the path, as were other people but I'm sure I haven't read or been told before that Kelly was. :confused:
iiHEARTy0u wrote: » This is an extract from Chapter Six by Sandra Lean
Once again, we are faced with serious anomalies in the prosecution case. Several witnesses were identified as having been on the path at the critical time that evening. In total there were a minimum of five – John [Name removed], Gordon [Name removed], his father, David [Name removed], Stephen Kelly, a witness who claimed to have heard a disturbance behind the wall, and the “mystery man” seen following Jodi onto the path[/i]
