"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

What a surprise 🙄

http://www.longroadtojustice.com/

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg448049.html#msg448049

Liar Sandra Lean stated on 26th October 2018

‘Today, my book about the case, Innocents Betrayed, was launched. Profits from the book are being donated to help fund a new organisation, Long Road to Justice, which will be taking a radically new approach to helping the fight against injustice…

What she actually meant was the profits were for herself

[Nicholas]

Liar Sandra Lean stated on 26th October 2018

‘Today, my book about the case, Innocents Betrayed, was launched. Profits from the book are being donated to help fund a new organisation, Long Road to Justice, which will be taking a radically new approach to helping the fight against injustice…

What she actually meant was the profits were for herself

Sandra Lean is a con women similar to Stephanie Bon

More to be published on this in the New Year

Part 1 👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/12/19/wrongful-convictions-miscarriages-of-justice-innocence-fraud-whats-the-difference/

Sandra Lean
‘If you pick and choose points, you can stitch them together to make what looks like a compelling narrative, so long a no-one comes along and ruins the story by pointing out all of the"missed out" bits that make a nonsense of it.‘

 

[Nicholas]

Baby killer Billy Middleton on Sandra Lean’s book ‘No Smoke’

7 December 2009
‘This book provides invaluable insight into the British justice system in a manner anyone can understand and everyone should be aware of. Having subsequently met the author I am also aware that the text is not simply an academic viewpoint but a heartfelt and passionate stand-point based on thorough examination of each featured case.
As a result, Sandra Lean has demonstrated not only an ability to highlight the flaws in each case but an awareness of the emotional turmoil experienced by the accused and families alike. A quality so often void from others writing from a purely sterile perspective.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/No-Smoke-Sandra-Lean/product-reviews/1906628009/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_paging_btm_next_2?ie=UTF8&reviewerType=all_reviews&pageNumber=2

Baby killer Billy Middleton did not just meet ‘the author’, he moved in with her

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean is a con women similar to Stephanie Bon

More to be published on this in the New Year

Part 1 👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/12/19/wrongful-convictions-miscarriages-of-justice-innocence-fraud-whats-the-difference/

Sandra Lean was told about a lot of this ⬆️ in 2014

Although she will lie and make false public claims like,

 ‘I would like to stress that it was not, and never has been, my intention to mislead’

⬇️
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html#msg456199

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean was told about a lot of this ⬆️ in 2014

Although she will lie and make false public claims like,

 ‘I would like to stress that it was not, and never has been, my intention to mislead’

⬇️
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html#msg456199

Sandra Lean went to very little effort, if any, to pull her book ‘No Smoke’ from sale

In fact some people were buying this book after she’d published her 2nd book

And at no time did she point out her numerous lies, errors and false and misleading narratives

I don’t even think Stephanie Bon was mentioned in ‘No Smoke’ by Sandra Lean even though she was Simon Hall’s girlfriend when Joan Albert was murdered

And according to Stephanie Bon, Simon Hall had ‘disappeared’ that weekend

⬇️

https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/12/19/wrongful-convictions-miscarriages-of-justice-innocence-fraud-whats-the-difference/

Why would Sandra Lean choose to leave out these crucial points from her book?

And how many crucial points has she left out of her second book - because we know she has! Because con women like Sandra Lean know how to manipulate and deceive their audience

Sandra Lean
‘If you pick and choose points, you can stitch them together to make what looks like a compelling narrative, so long a no-one comes along and ruins the story by pointing out all of the"missed out" bits that make a nonsense of it.‘

Source: https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg330669.html#msg330669

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean went to very little effort, if any, to pull her book ‘No Smoke’ from sale

In fact some people were buying this book after she’d published her 2nd book

And at no time did she point out her numerous lies, errors and false and misleading narratives

I don’t even think Stephanie Bon was mentioned in ‘No Smoke’ by Sandra Lean even though she was Simon Hall’s girlfriend when Joan Albert was murdered

And according to Stephanie Bon, Simon Hall had ‘disappeared’ that weekend

⬇️

https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/12/19/wrongful-convictions-miscarriages-of-justice-innocence-fraud-whats-the-difference/

Why would Sandra Lean choose to leave out these crucial facts from her book?

And how many crucial facts has she left out of her second book - because we know she has! Because con women like Sandra Lean know how to manipulate and deceive their audience

Source: https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg330669.html#msg330669

Stephanie Bon, who like Sandra Lean lied to the public (And anyone who would listen) published this in February 2013

 ⬇️

”Justice 4 Simon
Unfortunately, Justice4Simon has been taken offline for the time being.
This is due to the abuse and relentless bullying from Simon’s wife: “mrs h” on internet forums and social networking sites over the last 5 yrs.
I have kept records of most of her attacks particularly the ones over forums where “moderators” are it seems more interested in petty arguments and gossip mostly instigated by mrs h, then in the Simon Hall case, so I have decided not to post them on this website as I do not feel that it is in Simon’s best interest for the general public to see the manner in which his wife conveys herself.
All these messages have been monitored as I regularly report mrs h’s attacks to the police, what she fails to realise is that they have a vested interest in Simon’s case and therefore the way she conducts herself picking fights and insulting people will reflect badly on Simon.
Sadly, I can no longer sit by and watch her attempts at destroying my reputation by slandering me all over the internet, a faceless place where it’s so easy to do so…
For the people who are interested, you can follow mrs h’s work live on the links below.

And Sandra Lean went on to state

‘I personally believe that your recent online behaviour, the way you handled Simon's confession to the other burglary, and the consequent attacks of Shaun and Stephanie Bon have all been detrimental to public support for Simon [/i]
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg384705.html#msg384705

This ⬆️ was after Sandra Lean learned of the Zenith burglary

Only Sandra Lean knows exactly why she chooses to defend actual, factual, guilty, deceptive and sexually deviant killers like Simon Hall, Luke Mitchell (And all the others she promotes) and re write history and promote their false narratives

But it will be interesting to learn how much money she has made from her & killer Luke Mitchell’s innocence fraud

[Nicholas]

Here’s Sandra Leans ‘Hidden in plain view’ BS again 🙄

Sandra Lean
‘There is also the curious anomaly of very little blood on the trousers (a few spots) and the fact that there was no blood found in the knotted section of one leg and the wrapped section of the other. Even if it were possible for the killer to remain blood free while inflicting those horrendous wounds (and the evidence doesn't support that claim), how could a person move a fully clothed body, remove the heavily bloodstained upper clothing, trousers, socks and shoes then replace the socks, turn the body over to tie the arms (which were severely cut), with the trousers and still remain blood free? That scenario was before the jury, but it was hidden in plain view amongst the massive amount of irrelevant rubbish, in the guise of "evidence," they were swamped with.

Psychopathic killer Luke Mitchell had ample time to return to the spot where he had murdered [Name removed] and ample time to wash himself in the nearby river and at home, and to dispose of the clothing he wore earlier

Aiden Fucci was said to have stabbed his victim 114 times https://abcnews.go.com/US/14-year-boy-adult-allegedly-stabbing-teen-girl/story?id=77961546

Did video footage show him covered in blood?

[Nicholas]

Stephanie Bon, who like Sandra Lean lied to the public (And anyone who would listen) published this in February 2013

 ⬇️

”Justice 4 Simon
Unfortunately, Justice4Simon has been taken offline for the time being.
This is due to the abuse and relentless bullying from Simon’s wife: “mrs h” on internet forums and social networking sites over the last 5 yrs.
I have kept records of most of her attacks particularly the ones over forums where “moderators” are it seems more interested in petty arguments and gossip mostly instigated by mrs h, then in the Simon Hall case, so I have decided not to post them on this website as I do not feel that it is in Simon’s best interest for the general public to see the manner in which his wife conveys herself.
All these messages have been monitored as I regularly report mrs h’s attacks to the police, what she fails to realise is that they have a vested interest in Simon’s case and therefore the way she conducts herself picking fights and insulting people will reflect badly on Simon.
Sadly, I can no longer sit by and watch her attempts at destroying my reputation by slandering me all over the internet, a faceless place where it’s so easy to do so…
For the people who are interested, you can follow mrs h’s work live on the links below.

And Sandra Lean went on to state

This ⬆️ was after Sandra Lean learned of the Zenith burglary

Only Sandra Lean knows exactly why she chooses to defend actual, factual, guilty, deceptive and sexually deviant killers like Simon Hall, Luke Mitchell (And all the others she promotes) and re write history and promote their false narratives

But it will be interesting to learn how much money she has made from her & killer Luke Mitchell’s innocence fraud

And this from Shaun Hall - Jan 2013
‘Just remember, it’s YOUR show, YOU made this happen because YOU love the attention so now you have attention from people who actually know what goes on behind closed doors.

Stephanie Bon - Feb 2013
‘I am disappointed that Simon didn’t feel that he could share his latest revelation with me at the time I started J4S or during my work campaigning as I would definitely have advised him to seek the best advice and own up to the appropriate people as opposed to being speculated and gossiped about until it got leaked on a public forum.

Shaun Hall
“He has a history that he shouldn’t be proud of and to be honest, stolen goods from 11 years ago are the least of his worries
I know you lack the ability to see reason sometimes as you have demonstrated on many occasions, possibly because of how involved you are with Simon
Simon publicly shamed himself with his outburst in my opinion
Stephanie, please do everyone a favour and stop blaming everyone else for things that Simon is responsible for. First, Simon had every chance to confess to his actions on the night of Joan’s death, however he decided to keep this quiet. Saying that anyone else should go to the police is ridiculous as they wouldn’t want Simon to get in to further trouble.


What does Shane Mitchell know about the days events when his brother Luke murdered [Name removed] ?

[Nicholas]

And this from Shaun Hall - Jan 2013
‘Just remember, it’s YOUR show, YOU made this happen because YOU love the attention so now you have attention from people who actually know what goes on behind closed doors.

Stephanie Bon - Feb 2013
‘I am disappointed that Simon didn’t feel that he could share his latest revelation with me at the time I started J4S or during my work campaigning as I would definitely have advised him to seek the best advice and own up to the appropriate people as opposed to being speculated and gossiped about until it got leaked on a public forum.

Shaun Hall
“He has a history that he shouldn’t be proud of and to be honest, stolen goods from 11 years ago are the least of his worries
I know you lack the ability to see reason sometimes as you have demonstrated on many occasions, possibly because of how involved you are with Simon
Simon publicly shamed himself with his outburst in my opinion
Stephanie, please do everyone a favour and stop blaming everyone else for things that Simon is responsible for. First, Simon had every chance to confess to his actions on the night of Joan’s death, however he decided to keep this quiet. Saying that anyone else should go to the police is ridiculous as they wouldn’t want Simon to get in to further trouble.


What does Shane Mitchell know about the days events when his brother Luke murdered [Name removed] ?

‘JOAN Albert's murderer is being shielded by someone in Capel St Mary the officer leading the hunt for her killer said today.

Almost five months the 79-year-old was stabbed to death Detective Superintendent Roy Lambert revealed the key to the killer's identity likely lies within the 8,000 strong community.

Keen to stress the murder enquiry has not stalled, Det Supt Lambert told the Evening Star:

"Someone in Capel is withholding information, maybe deliberately. Capel St Mary is where the final piece of the jigsaw lies."
https://www.ipswichstar.co.uk/news/oap-s-killer-being-shielded-say-police-7408182


Lynne Hall and Stephanie Bon without doubt withheld information from the police

Just as it appears Corinne and Shane Mitchell have done in killer Luke Mitchell’s case

[Nicholas]

‘JOAN Albert's murderer is being shielded by someone in Capel St Mary the officer leading the hunt for her killer said today.

Almost five months the 79-year-old was stabbed to death Detective Superintendent Roy Lambert revealed the key to the killer's identity likely lies within the 8,000 strong community.

Keen to stress the murder enquiry has not stalled, Det Supt Lambert told the Evening Star:

"Someone in Capel is withholding information, maybe deliberately. Capel St Mary is where the final piece of the jigsaw lies."
https://www.ipswichstar.co.uk/news/oap-s-killer-being-shielded-say-police-7408182

Lynne Hall and Stephanie Bon without doubt withheld information from the police

Just as it appears Corinne and Shane Mitchell have done in killer Luke Mitchell’s case

Lynne Hall (killer Simon Hall’s adoptive mother) appeared in the last ever Rough Justice documentary - created by Peter Hill https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rough_Justice_(British_TV_programme)

Peter Hill attended killer Simon Hall’s 2010 appeal at the Royal Courts of Justice.

Charlatan Sandra Lean was unable to attend the December 2010 appeal, although she did attend the preliminary hearing in March 2010 alongside then boyfriend, baby killer Billy Middleton.

Sandra Lean claimed Peter Hill would be taking notes on her bahalf during the 3 day December 2010 appeal hearing

Lynne Hall lied throughout the last ever Rough Justice documentary, as did Stephanie Bon - who was killer Simon Hall’s girlfriend at the time he murdered Joan Albert (https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/12/19/wrongful-convictions-miscarriages-of-justice-innocence-fraud-whats-the-difference/)

Killer Luke Mitchell telephoned Corinne Mitchell at around 7.00pm, almost 2 hours after he had murdered [Name removed]

It’s been alleged the 7.00pm phone-call was made from Luke to Corinne to ask her to tell [Name removed], if she turned up at his house looking for him, he would be in the Abbey

Killer Luke Mitchell supporters have created a timeline of events but have chosen to omit details from their timeline, like for example when Luke was seen by his neighbour walking past his house at 10.00pm

There is also no mention on the timeline of smoke being seen coming from the Mitchell’s back garden

And no mention of any of the Mitchell’s exact movements on that night

Where was Shane Mitchell that night and what exactly was he doing?

Did Shane have a solid alibi throughout the night? What time was his car seen arriving home?

According to Corrine Mitchell, ‘Shane came and went most of the evening, which I found quite irritating!’ Where did Shane come from and where was he going to? (http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10768.msg541439#msg541439)

Where was Shane when Luke was allegedly watching a DVD at 9pm in his bedroom and where was Corinne?

And at what time did Luke leave his bedroom to go downstairs, in order for him to have allegedly gone up the stairs - according to Corinne - to fetch Shane’s torch?

Who’s torch was Luke using when he was seen walking past the neighbours house at 10pm

And where was Luke going to or coming from at 10pm?

[Nicholas]

From last month

Sandra Lean
Huge thanks to Maxine at www.youcallthisjustice.com for interviewing me for series 1 (interview is out today). A fantastic project and lots of really interesting interviews.

‘Maxine’ is Maxine Twynam the lawyer who chose to lie about sex offender, predator and convicted/exonerated killer Barry George
⬇️
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9318.msg673149#msg673149

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean went to very little effort, if any, to pull her book ‘No Smoke’ from sale

In fact some people were buying this book after she’d published her 2nd book

And at no time did she point out her numerous lies, errors and false and misleading narratives

I don’t even think Stephanie Bon was mentioned in ‘No Smoke’ by Sandra Lean even though she was Simon Hall’s girlfriend when Joan Albert was murdered

And according to Stephanie Bon, Simon Hall had ‘disappeared’ that weekend

⬇️

https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/12/19/wrongful-convictions-miscarriages-of-justice-innocence-fraud-whats-the-difference/

Why would Sandra Lean choose to leave out these crucial points from her book?

And how many crucial points has she left out of her second book - because we know she has! Because con women like Sandra Lean know how to manipulate and deceive their audience

Sandra Lean
‘If you pick and choose points, you can stitch them together to make what looks like a compelling narrative, so long a no-one comes along and ruins the story by pointing out all of the"missed out" bits that make a nonsense of it.‘

Source: https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg330669.html#msg330669

An article titled ‘The narcissists fan club’ has been reproduced here ⬇️

https://therealmrshspoofblog.wordpress.com/2017/10/28/the-narcissists-fan-club-aka-flying-monkeys/

along with one titled, ‘Playing the blame game as a manipulation tactic’

https://therealmrshspoofblog.wordpress.com/2016/04/17/playing-the-blame-game-as-a-manipulation-tactic/

Following the exposure of killer Simon Hall’s guilt in 2012/13 Sandra Lean went on to state she would be withdrawing her first book ‘No Smoke’ but she went back on this and when asked in 2017 whether or not she would be re-vising or withdrawing her book, as she had claimed she would be in doing in early 2014, she chose to play ‘the blame game’
⬇️
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg382408.html#msg382408

Sandra Lean has a small seemingly unsuspecting ‘fan club’ of ‘flying monkey’s’ who appear to not be aware of her ‘behaviour patterns’ or of her ‘problematic attitude’

The innocence fraud and malicious tactics of Sandra Lean will feature in the following blog series, due to be published in the New Year
PART 1 👉 https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/12/19/wrongful-convictions-miscarriages-of-justice-innocence-fraud-whats-the-difference/

[Nicholas]

According to Corrine Mitchell, ‘Shane came and went most of the evening, which I found quite irritating!’ Where did Shane come from and where was he going to? (http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10768.msg541439#msg541439)

Why did Corrine Mitchell allegedly find Shane’s coming and going ‘irritating’ ?

And what about Luke, who also appeared to be going in and out of the house - if all what Corinne has said over the years, to date, is to be believed.

[Nicholas]

But it will be interesting to learn how much money she has made from her & killer Luke Mitchell’s innocence fraud

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/scottish-news/6919979/crime-expert-sandra-lean-fund-effort-free-luke-mitchell/

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13091576/filing-history

Sandra Lean - 2018 (Source: https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg448049.html#msg448049)
’Today, my book about the case, Innocents Betrayed, was launched. Profits from the book are being donated to help fund a new organisation, Long Road to Justice, which will be taking a radically new approach to helping the fight against injustice.
Details of the book can be found here:
www.longroadtojustice.com

‘Long Road to Justice’ no longer appears to exists after having recently been removed from the WWW http://www.longroadtojustice.com/

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean stated on 18th November 2018

’The one thing I've learned over the years is that most families, right at the beginning, have no idea how awful the media can be and talk to them trustingly…’
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg448889.html#msg448889

Killers and their families, and friends, talk to the media ‘right at the beginning’ and at other times, in an attempt to divert attention away from themselves and in order to create false and misleading narratives, some of which can be seen in ‘the innocence fraud of Joan Albert’s killer’  ⬇️ https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/12/19/wrongful-convictions-miscarriages-of-justice-innocence-fraud-whats-the-difference/