"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean
Teenie Fin Don't be sorry - i'd rather people asked zillions of questions so that they know the facts!!!!


 


What did Sandra Lean’s 2nd book say on cruel and callous adoptee Corinne Mitchell and the enmeshed relationship she had with her sexually aggressive teenage son ?

[Nicholas]

Toxic Abuser & Pretend Criminologist Sandra Lean’s 19 Year Hoax & The Innocence Fraud Gravy Train Scam of Psychopathic Killer Luke Mitchell
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/the-innocencefraud-con-of-jodi-jones🌻-sadistic-psychopathic-schoolboy-killer-his-enablers/

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean omitted from her latests video - when she was comparing the killers family to the victims family - the fact that the killers mother Corinne Mitchell stopped off on her way home that night to buy alcohol

[Nicholas]

James Lochrie
What shocks me most is people at this trial knowing all along who the guilty people/s are . They are standing there giving evidence against an innocent boy . Can't get my head round what kind of people would do that .

 

[Nicholas]

Derek Edmond
Sandra Lean I’ll always stand by my beliefs that this is the most blatant miscarriage of justice in the Scottish Justice System (If we can call it that). When we weigh up all these anomalies, the overall weight they carry in proving the likelihood of Luke even being at the path until after his call with the search party becomes even less likely. I’m not convinced that the drive by sighting was of Luke or indeed Jodi. I think it’s most likely been the couple. I find it preposterous that when Jodi was found and there wasn’t a great big pool of blood or stains everywhere that the Police didn’t demand the whole wooded area to be combed with forensics to locate where the murder took place. It’s literally basic investigation that any detective should be undertaking. There’s no way Jodi was murdered outside those woods and brought in as at the proposed murder time, it was like daytime outside and light. If it’s not been at the V-point, where was she attacked? That’s always been something on my mind. I think that the moped being at the break in the wall suggests that these boy’s know more than they’ve let on. Cutting hair was an admission of anxiety over being identified. He was there and until he gives a solid alibi proving otherwise, he is a serious person of interest. It’s made me always wonder if Jodi was ambushed having been followed down towards the woods. Something definitely seems suspicious. If it is as I believe that members of Jodi’s family have been perverting the course of justice, it’s utterly disgusting to do that to Jodi. Anyone losing a loved one like that would naturally want to be moving mountains to find the culprit(s). Why when forensically proven impossible that it could’ve been Luke, did Judith not want every person of interest equally investigated? It’s all a bit suspect. The more I’ve researched on the case, the more it makes me feel physically sick. Knowing both Jodi and Luke personally from school, it makes it harder to accept this injustice.

 

Derek saw the pair of them chatting in the school playground once apparently - this equates to him knowing them both

[Nicholas]

More of Scott Forbes projections   

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XGzKwUlZsMo

[Nicholas]

Derek Edmond
Sandra Lean I’ll always stand by my beliefs that this is the most blatant miscarriage of justice in the Scottish Justice System (If we can call it that). When we weigh up all these anomalies, the overall weight they carry in proving the likelihood of Luke even being at the path until after his call with the search party becomes even less likely. I’m not convinced that the drive by sighting was of Luke or indeed Jodi. I think it’s most likely been the couple. I find it preposterous that when Jodi was found and there wasn’t a great big pool of blood or stains everywhere that the Police didn’t demand the whole wooded area to be combed with forensics to locate where the murder took place. It’s literally basic investigation that any detective should be undertaking. There’s no way Jodi was murdered outside those woods and brought in as at the proposed murder time, it was like daytime outside and light. If it’s not been at the V-point, where was she attacked? That’s always been something on my mind. I think that the moped being at the break in the wall suggests that these boy’s know more than they’ve let on. Cutting hair was an admission of anxiety over being identified. He was there and until he gives a solid alibi proving otherwise, he is a serious person of interest. It’s made me always wonder if Jodi was ambushed having been followed down towards the woods. Something definitely seems suspicious. If it is as I believe that members of Jodi’s family have been perverting the course of justice, it’s utterly disgusting to do that to Jodi. Anyone losing a loved one like that would naturally want to be moving mountains to find the culprit(s). Why when forensically proven impossible that it could’ve been Luke, did Judith not want every person of interest equally investigated? It’s all a bit suspect. The more I’ve researched on the case, the more it makes me feel physically sick. Knowing both Jodi and Luke personally from school, it makes it harder to accept this injustice.

 

Derek saw the pair of them chatting in the school playground once apparently - this equates to him knowing them both

Sandra Lean
Derek Edmond There's an area further down in the woodland strip that's much more covered and much less likely to be seen by passers by. I've no idea, of course, but if I was asked to make an educated guess, I'd say that's the most likely place for the murder to have occcurred. (Sic)

Derek Edmond
Sandra Lean you’re probably right. Looking at probable location, the density of there would make it a likelier location.

Did hoaxer and pretend criminologist Sandra Lean explain in her second book anything about internal and external blood loss?

[Nicholas]

More of Scott Forbes projections   

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XGzKwUlZsMo

Stuart Dempsey has made an appearance also

👇
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=12082.msg651637#msg651637

[Nicholas]

Part 113
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/11/01/killer-luke-mitchell-foolish-stuart-dempsey-follows-toxic-abuser-michelle-moore-balls-of-steel-scott-forbes-part-113/

[Nicholas]

“Balls of steel” Scott Forbes now claimed SCCRC ‘reports’ are no for the public

 

What a total moron he is
👇
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XGzKwUlZsMo

Are only mass murderers ‘reports’ for the public
👇
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-17504387

“Balls of steel”

 

Scott Forbes & His ‘Balls Of Steel’ (Part 95)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/10/28/killer-luke-mitchell-narcissist-scott-forbes-his-balls-of-steel-part-95/

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean knew when she wrote and published her second book in 2018 that the prosecutions theory would have differed to reality

Just like she knew the prosecutions theory re: killer Simon Hall and the burglary gone wrong story was wrong

Her latest hoax nonsense aren’t new revelations as she has pretended to claim

Killer Luke Mitchell and his cruel and callous mother - and hoaxer Sandra lean - would have known where [Name removed] was dropped off on the Saturday night by the taxi years ago who’s house she was dropped off too

This evidence would have been presented at trial re the washing machine transfer theory

But callous Corinne and her killer son Luke didn’t want this snippet used in their innocence fraud PR campaign as it didn’t go in their favour

If Sandra Lean believed the sadistic teen killer were innocent she’d have published the SCCRC statement of reasons, killer Luke, his mother Corinne and Shane and Philip Mitchell’s witness statements

The reaoson she didn’t was because their innocence fraud would have been discovered earlier

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean still hasn’t clarified where her eldest daughter was living at the time violent, sexually aggressive and ‘out of control’ killer Luke Mitchell murdered one of his girlfriends

Nor has Sandra Lean ever clarified why her eldest daughter didn’t live with her

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean
Good evening everyone! Massive thanks for all the comments and shares for the latest video. Can I just remind everyone, though, we still have to be very, very mindful of speculation. Even though the evidence now tells us that some people were definitely privy to information that they did not disclose to investigators, that doesn't equal proof that they were in any way involved (knowingly or otherwise) with what happened to Jodi ... or, ultimately, Luke.
I know how careful you all are, I just wanted to clarify that very thin line between what we now know and what it actually proves or disproves in other aspects of the case.

And you have no idea what was and wasn’t disclosed to investigators

Keep it coming Sandra Lean - Suspect your malignant narcissism blinds you at times

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean
I've slightly edited this article from 2003, to cut out the almost 600 words quoting the various religious leaders and prayers in the community at the time, but there's some very interesting stuff in here - note the date and time - Monday 7th July 01.00am - Remember, GD and JoF only came forward Saturday 5th and Sunday 6th!!! And they had AB's "sighting" from July 1st and 2nd by this stage!!

Jodi murder police rule out ritual killing

DETECTIVES TODAY RULED OUT A LINK WITH SATANISM OR BLACK MAGIC IN THE HUNT FOR THE KILLER OF MURDERED SCHOOLGIRL JODI JONES.
By The Newsroom
7th Jul 2003, 1:00am
They dismissed reports suggesting she had been the victim of a ritual killing and quashed local rumours that she had been disembowelled during a savage knife attack.
Murder squad officers broke their silence today to end speculation.
A spokesman for Lothian and Borders Police said: "We have found no link between Jodi’s death and anything connected with Satanism or black magic. It is not an avenue of inquiry we are following."
.

What date did Richard Hopkins travel to Scotland?

And what did Shane Mitchell say about his cruel and callous mothers background Sandra?

And what did Philip Mitchell say?

[Nicholas]

kirsty Smith
Lynne Bryce, I hope I don't upset you but I always wonder how the family are so determined to accept it was Luke, especially over the years with more and more coming out.  I find that hard to comprehend probably because I'm fortunate not to be in that position.

Michele Scott
Kirsty Smith I agree. Maybe the alternative is too unthinkable for them and it’s easier to accept it was Luke Mitchell.  Just my thoughts

Kirsty Smith
Michele Scott maybe, its hard to get your head round it.  I can't get my head round that family members should have been investigated regardless.  Id like to think in that situation every avenue was covered and covered again.

Sandra Lean
Kirsty Smith Michele Scott You also have to remember how much time the police had to convince the family that their (the police's) theory was correct - and to influence the family's recall, right at the most horrifying time of their lives.

Michelle Scott
Sandra Lean - yes that’s part of it for sure.  The police influence on statements are there for all to see.. thanks to you for highlighting those in your book otherwise everyone would be none the wiser


No Michele Scott it was ‘unthinkable’ for Sandra Lean in 2014