"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

And

 


Motive, Speculation, And Character Assassination
”Simon cannot account for his whereabouts between 5.30 and 6.30am that morning. The murder most probably occurred sometime prior to 3am ~ Sandra Lean from her first book No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice

 

Transcripts for all records of police interviews from 25th to 26th July 2002 start here
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/04/28/record-of-interview-1-25th-july-2002-1340hrs-to-1423hrs/

Proof of evidence statement here
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/05/r-v-simon-john-hall-proof-of-evidence-witness-statement-referring-to-events-of-the-15th-and-16th-december-2001/

[Nicholas]

Fraudster and hoaxer Sandra Lean January 2017

”If it helps, I can give a synopsis of what the revision to the Simon Hall chapter in No Smoke would have comprised, and why:
👇
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg382961.html#msg382961

 

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from fraudster and hoaxer Sandra Lean from No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice

“..he had just been accepted for a loan to buy a car”

Killer Simon Hall paid for the car he picked up on Saturday the 15th December 2001 (the day before he committed his murder) using cash - no loan (accepted or otherwise) was involved

See Simon Hall’s 2002 proof of evidence statement below
👇

author=Nicholas link=topic=11976.msg695071#msg695071 date=1668286149]
Proof of evidence statement here
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/05/r-v-simon-john-hall-proof-of-evidence-witness-statement-referring-to-events-of-the-15th-and-16th-december-2001/

Re: Saturday the 15th December 2001
“Having acquired the Audi, I then completed the sale of my Golf GTI to Glenn on that same day outside a pub in Stutton. I can’t remember the name of the pub but it is Glenn’s local pub. He gave me a cash payment for the Golf GTI which I in turn had used to purchase the Audi
~ Simon Hall (2002)

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from fraudster and hoaxer Sandra Lean from No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice

“..he had just been accepted for a loan to buy a car”

Killer Simon Hall paid for the car he picked up on Saturday the 15th December 2001 using cash - no loan (accepted or otherwise)  was involved

See proof of evidence statement below
👇
Re: Saturday the 15th December 2001
“Having acquired the Audi, I then completed the sale of my Golf GTI to Glenn on that same day outside a pub in Stutton. I can’t remember the name of the pub but it is Glenn’s local pub. He gave me a cash payment for the Golf GTI which I in turn had used to purchase the Audi
~ Simon Hall (2002)

Sandra Lean (January 2017)
“I spoke with many people (including others whose cases were mentioned or discussed) about the question of withdrawing the book. Not one of them wanted the book withdrawn. There were discussions about possible revisions which would, of necessity, have taken a great deal of time and effort - time and effort that I was not capable of devoting to the matter at that time.

Why did compulsive liars Corinne Mitchell and her sadistic killer son Luke Mitchell not want compulsive liar Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice revised or withdrawn knowing it was full of lies, misinformation and disinformation ?

Or will fraudster Sandra Lean claim she didn’t speak with the Mitchell’s about revising and/or withdrawing her first book

And what about the other people Sandra Lean allegedly spoke to about revising and/or withdrawing her first book

Did these people also not care about the lies, misinformation and disinformation contained within Sandra Lean first book?

And I’ve only pointed out the lies, misinformation and disinformation from a handful of sentences from chapter 5

 

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from Sandra Leans first book No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice

”Even assuming the time of death could be pinpointed to “around 6am,” as the prosecution claimed, it now has to be accepted that Simon dropped his friend at 5.30am, drove (drunkenly) 7 miles to Mrs Albert’s home

Killer Simon Hall did drop Jamie Barker off at 5.30am.

Jamie Barker was a work colleague of killer Simon Hall’s, they weren’t friends per se (they barely knew each other) and he wasn’t drunk. Simon Hall didn’t drink much.

And he drove to his parents house in Snowcroft NOT Mrs Albert’s home, parking his car in Scowcroft NOT Boydlands.

Why would a compulsive liar and fraudster like Sandra Lean choose to write and publish a second book in the knowledge her first book was full of lies, misinformation and disinformation

And why the double binds - how much ‘time and effort’ did the second book take to write?

And why did compulsive liar Sandra Lean pretend in October 2019 she had only made ‘one typo’ in her first book No Smoke? It was (and is) riddled with lies and fabricated stories

Sandra Lean (January 2017)
“I spoke with many people (including others whose cases were mentioned or discussed) about the question of withdrawing the book. Not one of them wanted the book withdrawn. There were discussions about possible revisions which would, of necessity, have taken a great deal of time and effort - time and effort that I was not capable of devoting to the matter at that time.

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from Sandra Leans first book No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice

”If Mrs Albert died at 6am, if follows that Simon was still inflicting the after death injuries at 6.30am, if he was the killer. Therefore he could not have been at home.

The pathologist said ‘possibly up to’ 30 minutes - NOT that it would have taken 30 minutes

Killer Simon Hall, like killer Luke Mitchell, inflicted injuries following his murder/‘after death’

Piquerism is said to be an ‘under-researched sexual paraphilic disorder’

Both killers Simon Hall and Luke Mitchell appeared to have had enmeshed relationships with their adoptive and adoptee mothers

Article of possible interest https://ebrary.net/157567/psychology/displaced_matricide

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from chapter 5 of Sandra Leans first book No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice

”Also, the prosecution accused Mrs Hall of being dishonest about the fact she had once run a clothing business, because “she did not tell police about it earlier” completely missing the point that she had not, in fact, been asked about it earlier!

It was hoaxer Sandra Lean who missed the point and was wrong once again

As can be seen from the prosecutions closing speech (Page 31)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/03/26/regina-v-simon-hall-transcript-of-prosecutions-closing-speech/

Lynne Hall wasn’t accused by the prosecution “of being dishonest about the fact she had once run a clothing business”

Lynne Hall was accused of being dishonest about the dates she stored the items from her ‘clothing business’ in the wardrobe of bedroom 3

[Nicholas]

What impact did Corinne Mitchell’s adoption have on her sons

What has Shane Mitchell said about his relationship with his adoptee mother?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg383172.html#msg383172

"When toxic types can’t control the way you see yourself, they start to control how others see you; they play the martyr while you’re labeled the toxic one. A smear campaign is a preemptive strike to sabotage your reputation and slander your name so that you won’t have a support network to fall back on lest you decide to detach and cut ties with this toxic person. They may even stalk and harass you or the people you know as a way to supposedly “expose” the truth about you; this exposure acts as a way to hide their own abusive behavior while projecting it onto you.
.

And what was killer Luke Mitchell’s relationship with his mother

And how did killer Luke Mitchell really view his mother

Who was the person (‘credible suspect’) compulsive liar Corinne Mitchell initially attempted to blame her sons murder of [Name removed] on?

How old was killer Luke Mitchell when he wrote his essay headed ‘pain and suffering’

What has killer Luke Mitchell said about his mother Corinne’s adoption and how her ‘issues’ impacted on him?

How did killer and sexually aggressive Luke Mitchell feel, whilst sat being recorded for his Sky news TV interview with his mother Corinne stroking his ear like she did

[Nicholas]

Compulsive liar Corinne Mitchell knew why [Name removed]’s family did not want her or her killer son Luke Mitchell as [Name removed]’s funeral

Corinne Mitchell knew by this time that [Name removed]’s family believed her killer son Luke was responsible for his murder of [Name removed]

But malignant narcissist Corinne Mitchell didn’t care

And Corinne Mitchell went out of her way to attempt to make that day ([Name removed]’s funeral) all about her and her killer son

Note: Shane Mitchell was no where to be seen

“Narcissists punish for numerous reasons

1 to control
2 to get revenge
3 to demonstrate their powers of influence
4 to obtain/regain compliance
5 to vent their rage
6 to assert their entitlement
7 to shut down potential or actual threats
8 to defeat “competition”
9 to display their dominance
10 to get “respect”
11 to create fear
12 to derive sadistic pleasure
https://narcissistfamilyfiles.com/2017/12/11/narcissists-torture-others-believe-theyre-right/

These two narcissists had only known [Name removed] for a few months

Malignant narcissist Corinne Mitchell did not think “what harm could it do” in relation to the Sky TV news interview

Corinne Mitchell knew exactly what harm her actions could and would do on that day

The Sky news TV interview was staged by malignant narcissist Corinne Mitchell

Corinne Mitchell stated in 2020/21 ~ “Erm in fact I thought it could do better because there there was whisper of say Luke not caring a jot..”

[Nicholas]

“Narcissists punish for numerous reasons

1 to control
2 to get revenge
3 to demonstrate their powers of influence
4 to obtain/regain compliance
5 to vent their rage
6 to assert their entitlement
7 to shut down potential or actual threats
8 to defeat “competition”
9 to display their dominance
10 to get “respect”
11 to create fear
12 to derive sadistic pleasure
https://narcissistfamilyfiles.com/2017/12/11/narcissists-torture-others-believe-theyre-right/

Malignant narcissist Corinne Mitchell did not think “what harm could it do” in relation to the Sky TV news interview

Corinne Mitchell knew exactly what harm her actions could and would do on that day

The Sky news TV interview was staged by malignant narcissist Corinne Mitchell

Corinne Mitchell stated in 2020/21 ~ “Erm in fact I thought it could do better because there there was whisper of say Luke not caring a jot..”

“HOW DARE YOU” - media headline following the Sky news TV interview

Corinne and killer Luke Mitchell ‘dare’ behave like this because they were (and are) malignant narcissists

Corinne Mitchell again referring to their Sky news TV interview

“..well at least if we show them this then at least they know we are thinking about her and we do have emotions and what not   

‘Her’ not Jodi ‘her’

[Nicholas]

“HOW DARE YOU” - media headline following the Sky news TV interview

Corinne and Luke Mitchell ‘dare’ behave like this because they were (and are) malignant narcissists

Corinne Mitchell again referring to their Sky news TV interview

“..well at least if we show them this then at least they know we are thinking about her and we do have emotions and what not   

‘Her’ not Jodi ‘her’

Adoptee Corinne Mitchell (circa 2020/21) referring to their staged Sky TV news interview

“Yeah the public turned against us on that one..”

Killer Simon Hall’s adoptive mother Lynne Hall behaved similar to Corinne Mitchell

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-12195159 (Lynne Hall told bare faced lies in her BBC interview - which appears to have been removed)

Malignant narcissist Lynne Hall also appeared on a TV show (in 2007), alongside her husband Phil Hall and Stephanie Bon in which they all told various types of lies

[Nicholas]

I have read "No Smoke", and i got the impression that SL was not saying the people featured in it were definitely innocent, but that there were aspects of their trials that made one ask questions.

Given the fact hoaxer Sandra Leans book No Smoke The Shocking Truth About British Justice is riddled with lies, misinformation and disinformation - why would she choose to not correct her lies, misinformation and disinformation before writing and publishing a second book?

Sandra Leans chapter 5 on killer Simon Hall demonstrated a lot of what she wrote and published was fabricated

Why would a pretend criminologist like Sandra Lean choose to keep her fabricated work (1st book) in circulation and not want to revise all the fabrications and lies before writing and publishing a second book?

And why did Sandra Lean choose to bare face lie about ‘one typo’?

Further excerpts from Sandra Leans first book No Smoke

”The most worrying issues raised by the Simon Hall case:

Police failed to follow up other leads

What with Shaun Hall’s fingerprints?

Forensic And Other Physical Evidence

“In spite of police claims that they were trying to eliminate every possible suspect, they never took fingerprints from Simon’s brother Shaun (raising the question, where else might they have had opportunity to take fingerprints, but failed to do so?)

Compulsive liar Shaun Hall was alibied for the weekend. He was miles away with his then girlfriend Leigh and her father (who they lived with in Ipswich)

”Police files were suppressed or hidden

NO they weren’t!

Police files were disclosed to killer Simon Hall and his defence team pre trial

Maybe by ‘suppressed’ and ‘hidden’ fraud and hoaxer Sandra Lean was referring to what killer Simon Hall and Lynne, Phil and Shaun Hall and Stephanie Bon had ‘hidden’ and ‘suppressed’ from Sandra

“The jury appears to have ignored “the facts”

Seems it was Sandra Lean who “ignored the facts”

“The judge fails to properly direct the jury, and at times appears to lead them in the direction of the prosecution argument

Judge Rafferty made it clear in her summing up if the jury didn’t agree with her on the ‘facts’ then the jury should ignore her (Page 3)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/08/transcript-of-judges-summing-up-r-v-simon-john-hall/

[Nicholas]

Hoaxer and innocence fraud pusher Sandra Lean 10th January 2017

“Media wars are not my thing. Misinformation is not my thing. Have at it, Stephanie.

When I revise No Smoke, the quote I posted earlier, give or take, will be the revision for Simon's case. Take it or leave it!
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg382996.html#msg382996

 

[Nicholas]

“Narcissists punish for numerous reasons

1 to control
2 to get revenge
3 to demonstrate their powers of influence
4 to obtain/regain compliance
5 to vent their rage
6 to assert their entitlement
7 to shut down potential or actual threats
8 to defeat “competition”
9 to display their dominance
10 to get “respect”
11 to create fear
12 to derive sadistic pleasure
https://narcissistfamilyfiles.com/2017/12/11/narcissists-torture-others-believe-theyre-right/

These two narcissists had only known [Name removed] for a few months

Malignant narcissist Corinne Mitchell did not think “what harm could it do” in relation to the Sky TV news interview

Corinne Mitchell knew exactly what harm her actions could and would do on that day

The Sky news TV interview was staged by malignant narcissist Corinne Mitchell

Corinne Mitchell stated in 2020/21 ~ “Erm in fact I thought it could do better because there there was whisper of say Luke not caring a jot..”

Lucy Brier stated during the channel 5 TV show that killer Luke Mitchell and [Name removed] had dated for “five months”

On the 14th of February 2003 killer Luke Mitchell was with one of the Kim’s

and suggested elsewhere that they had ‘dated’ for around three months not five

[Nicholas]

How did compulsive liar Corinne Mitchell ‘notice’ her killer son Luke Mitchell’s police tape was marked ‘suspect’ and her tape was marked ‘witness’?

Presumably Corinne Mitchell was in the room with her youngest son whilst he was interviewed on the 2nd of July 2003

Was Luke also in the same room when his mother was interviewed?