"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[faithlilly]

John - 6th May 2010
Before I go, can you tell me if the suggestion was ever raised that Jodi may have disturbed someone on the track that fateful evening?

Corinne Mitchell
John
sorry, missed a question!
It would be unlikely Jodi would have disturbed someone walking down the path as it was quite well used by dog walkers and joggers!
However, if she was going behind the wall to say meet F e r r i s to get some cannabis before meeting Luke she may well have disturbed someone.
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/shirleymckie/luke-mitchell-new-thread-t600-s30.html

John F e r r i s’s evidence was that he met killer Luke Mitchell to supply him cannabis NOT Jodi Jones

 

Jodi smoked cannabis shortly before her death. How do you think that the cannabis got there?

[Nicholas]

Jodi smoked cannabis shortly before her death. How do you think that the cannabis got there?

Where’s the evidence for this?

“JODI Jones smoked cannabis with the youth accused of murdering her just hours before she died, a court was told yesterday.

‘Shortly before’ = lunchtime

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell
John
sorry, missed a question!
It would be unlikely Jodi would have disturbed someone walking down the path as it was quite well used by dog walkers and joggers!
However, if she was going behind the wall to say meet F e r r i s to get some cannabis before meeting Luke she may well have disturbed someone.
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/shirleymckie/luke-mitchell-new-thread-t600-s30.html

Corinne Mitchell’s statement makes no sense

Jodi Jones was NOT meeting with F e r r i s - she was meeting with her killer son Luke

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell
John
sorry, missed a question!
It would be unlikely Jodi would have disturbed someone walking down the path as it was quite well used by dog walkers and joggers!
However, if she was going behind the wall to say meet F e r r i s to get some cannabis before meeting Luke she may well have disturbed someone.
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/shirleymckie/luke-mitchell-new-thread-t600-s30.html

Another of Corinne Mitchell’s freudian slips maybe

John F e r r i s’s evidence was that killer Luke Mitchell still owed him for the cannabis he sold him

On what date exactly did he supply him with the weed?

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell - 27th June 2010
Holly will have to wait until tomorrow. I'm off home now so won't have access to this until then.
I feel I really should warn you though........what you hear from me.....you may not like.

Who was ‘Holly’ and why did Corinne Mitchell state -’I feel I really should warn you though…….
 what you hear from me.....you may not like’ ?

[Nicholas]

Did John F e r r I s supply killer Luke Mitchell with cannibals on 30th June 2003 ?

Corinne Mitchell - 7th May 2010
One of the youths on the moped ,who lied about the time they were on the path lived in Reed Drive (directly below school)
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/shirleymckie/luke-mitchell-jodi-jones-the-map-t609.html

Did killer Luke Mitchell tell his mother Corinne Mitchell he had seen John F e r r i s on the path?

[Nicholas]

‘Under lengthy cross-examination by the defence QC, Donald Findlay, he agreed that after the death he changed his appearance by hacking off his hair, delayed in going to the police, mis-stated the time he had been at the path, and had been ostracised by some of Jodi’s family. Each time Mr Findlay asked if he had murdered Jodi, he replied: "No."

‘He admitted having supplied cannabis to friends and relatives, and said that Mitchell regularly bought the drug from him, and still owed him for his last purchase, on the day before Jodi’s death.

Was John F e r r i s ‘ostracised by some of Jodi’s family’ because they thought he may have met killer Luke Mitchell on the path before he (Luke Mitchell) committed his murder of [Name removed] as opposed to the ‘day before’?

[faithlilly]

‘Under lengthy cross-examination by the defence QC, Donald Findlay, he agreed that after the death he changed his appearance by hacking off his hair, delayed in going to the police, mis-stated the time he had been at the path, and had been ostracised by some of Jodi’s family. Each time Mr Findlay asked if he had murdered Jodi, he replied: "No."

‘He admitted having supplied cannabis to friends and relatives, and said that Mitchell regularly bought the drug from him, and still owed him for his last purchase, on the day before Jodi’s death.

Was John F e r r i s ‘ostracised by some of Jodi’s family’ because they thought he may have met killer Luke Mitchell on the path before he (Luke Mitchell) committed his murder of [Name removed] as opposed to the ‘day before’?

Looking forward to the day any of your diatribes I are actually backed up by evidence.

[Nicholas]

Looking forward to the day any of your diatribes I are actually backed up by evidence.

Any idea who Holly was ?

Corinne Mitchell - 27th June 2010
Holly will have to wait until tomorrow. I'm off home now so won't have access to this until then.
I feel I really should warn you though........what you hear from me.....you may not like.

[Nicholas]

Read the book.

[53] It was important to recognise that there had been an acceptance on the part of the appellant that a fair trial was possible. That had been the position taken up before the trial judge at the preliminary hearing on 6 October 2004, as appeared from paragraph [90] of his report, and it was reiterated in the appellant's submissions before this court.
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=e2988aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7

Did fraudster Sandra Lean include a reproduced copy of paragraph [90] from the pre trial hearing on 6th October 2004 in her book?

along with a copy of the submissions made to the appeal court ?

[Nicholas]

 

Gary Peden
In all reality the tip may well have broken during the sustained frenzied attack on JM and by all accounts of the pathology situation seems scant, there's every possiblity the tip may well be lodged in JM bone🤷 terrible thing to think but perhaps exhumation will be the only way to establish this and recover lost/intentionally destroyed finger nail scrapings, and if this has to occur the blame for such an unthinkable thing is the crown and the police for bending their own rules and any guarantee given be LM's legal team not to pursue a case against the crown cannot be honored given the damage it has caused to LM appeal, all fair in love and war. IMO 🤷

Your ‘reality’ is sick and twisted fantasy Gary Peden

[Nicholas]

Nick Maiden
The reason I feel the blade would of been blunted at tip.
Is if someone was carrying in rucksack regularly.
Running or bouncing around , active movement.
It allows you too move fast without tip potentially pericing the carrier

 

Nick Maiden
I believe the Tip too be removed on purpose.
Hence me bringing it up.

 

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from Sandra Lean’s discredited book No Smoke

‘What becomes critical here is the prosecution‟s claim as to the sequence and timing of events. They would claim that Jodi left home at approximately 4.50pm, and was murdered around 5.15pm, her body being stripped and mutilated thereafter. In an attempt to pin down these timings, police video footage timed the walk from the point where Luke was identified at the end of his street to the Newbattle entrance to the path where Jodi was killed, at just over 5 minutes at a brisk walking pace. Walking the full length of the path, from end to end, at a similar pace would take an absolute minimum of 10 minutes. If, as the prosecution claimed, Luke left to meet Jodi in response to texts they‟d exchanged earlier (the last one being at 4.38pm), we have to accept that Luke was at the end of his street when these texts were exchanged, he left immediately, took a very brisk walk up the path, covering the distance in the minimum possible time, and arrived to meet Jodi with just one minute to spare within the "identification" window produced by Andrina

What if killer Luke Mitchell used his other push bike?

What would the timings look like if killer Luke Mitchell was on his other missing push bike?

Fantasy ‘Lawyer’ Scott ‘Beam Me Up Scottie!’ Forbes & The Killers Missing Bike (Part 127)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/11/19/killer-luke-mitchell-fantasy-lawyer-scott-beam-me-up-scottie-forbes-the-killers-missing-bike-part-127/

Crystal Smith is another mother who aided her son Aiden Fucci following his murder of Tristyn Bailey (13)

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=12090.msg651685#msg651685

[Nicholas]

So again Nicholas you are bang on with "What the hell is wrong with these people?" By not given context, by lying constantly by omission, leaves this obtuse narrative of utter bollocks. It does what it says on the tin, focus at all times upon these others.

Why has Sandra Lean chosen to not tell all those people she is choosing to dupe about all the details about killer Luke Mitchell’s missing push bike?

UPDATED - Malignant Narcissist Sandra Lean’s Bad Habits (Part 109)
‘Sandra Lean puts the gran, sister and Steven Kelly at this path at 10.58pm. A somewhat precise time?

There is no information as to why she has this time, no source - nothing, but uses this to infer the search party had left the house before knowing this girl was missing?

What is clear, is that there is numerous times of contact between Judith, Luke and the grans house phone, who do we imagine Judith was talking to when the house phone was answered in the grans? And presumably more calls to this grans mobile whilst out. Why does Sandra Lean miss out all of those, along with any information given.

http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/10/31/killer-luke-mitchell-malignant-narcissist-sandra-leans-bad-habits-guest-blog/

[Nicholas]

Matt Elliott
Petition handover: Scottish Parliament 16/11/22
Thank-you to everyone who turned up yesterday, signed the petition, wrote to your MP ,shared this injustice and just for caring.
Dr Sandra Lean has worked tirelessly on this case, and is truly grateful to you all and the progress WE are making. Yesterday we made history.
Special mention to Scott Forbes, Neil, Rachel, Sharon and all the Facebook team who work tirelessly, and respectfully ,in the background...you know who you are.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cOk1TSt9268

(At around 2:19) Matt (Matthew) Elliott edited the above and has made Sandra Lean and Russell Findlay’s handshake appear very different to the handshakes that took place in reality  - in the unedited version (available to view on Fb)

In reality - Russell Findlay first shook the hand of gouger Scott Forbes, while charlatan Sandra Lean put her hand out, and waited with her hand out for split seconds before the handshake actually took place

Why did Matt Elliott choose to edit his video down so it didn’t include Sandra Lean standing there with her hand out?

And did Matt Elliott do this of his own accord or was it suggested to him by someone that he edit out fraudster Scott Forbes and the delay in the handshake between Russel Findlay and Sandra Lean?

Deluded ‘Photographer, Filmmaker & Producer’ Matthew Elliott’s ‘Friend’ & Gravy Train Jumper Naomi Channell (Part 133)
‘Toxic abuser and innocence fraud pusher and enabler Sandra Lean also fabricated a misleading innocence fraud narrative for actual, factual guilty and dangerous killer Simon Hall (along with 6 other guilty killers) in her 1st discredited book, which was published in 2007 and again in 2008.
And morally duplicitous Sandra Lean’s 1st discredited book is still being sold!
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/11/25/killer-luke-mitchell-deluded-matthew-elliotts-friend-gravy-train-jumper-naomi-channell-part-133/