If ever there was a prime example of being glib, this is it. Can you expand on this? Extra points if you don't mention gps evidence (or lack of it). Lol! Let's face it, even with the late appointment of Damien Thorn's legal team, they still had the time & resources to get the gps evidence sorted out -- or any other evidence they needed at the time. However, if I remember correctly, GPS evidence back in 2003 was futile, as it could not track a person's whereabouts down specifically or within acceptable legal parameters; certainly not accurate enough to be used by either the defence or prosecution? Surely it would have been used if it could further a legal argument in court?
Correct Mr Apples - This repetition of implanting fallacy continues as someone else works their way through the book. The cell cite analysis at the time was indeed futile and very much a reason why the defence could do no more with it. Within a mile radius of accuracy from the nearest mast/provider. As the crow flies between two points, west and east, they could only determine it was used between those areas. Not its exact spot. Using of course phone logs (that are still hidden), to show LM using the speaking clock whilst out and about, times he was unlikely to have been home, on his way to school, lunch time and so forth. DF could do not better with cell cite analysis that was unable to pin point and exact location within a mile radius. Within the area of LM's movements that day.
They really are all over the shop with constant contradictions - What codswallop, pulling out the evidence may not have been strong, just that defence did not do all these things we think they should have done, who are these people to place themselves above the expertise of DF on the basis of fallacy fed to them?
CCTV, do they even stop to think what they are actually saying here, spinning different words on that same yarn, making it sound like their own idea when it is clearly not. 2003 and the shop in Newtongrange was "Morning, Noon and Night" not part of the coop group until later. Checking that CCTV for timings and people in the area such as the boys on the cycles, they caught/captured CM in a place she claimed not to be, giving alibi to her son at this point falsely. So certainly with CCTV it aided that investigation, around dishonesty for a start. To then have the honesty of AO's, who had told police of his route, when they checked he was exactly where he stated, using this as a starting point to time the schoolgirl leaving her home. Sl's inbuilt trial attendee in the shape of LM is the last person to be relying upon where honesty is concerned, he was proven beyond all doubt to be just that, a compulsive liar.
The store AB used had NO internal CCTV, not even sure it has any to date, it did however, as does both the ones in Newtongrange and Mayfield, have cameras at the cashpoint externally. Trouble with the one AB used, it was out front and not in the car park area, where it would not capture anything of leaving and exiting towards the east. Mayfield pretty much the same, Newtongrange to the side and facing on to most of the car park. Not sure when this changed to a coop, before or after 2003.
Therefore the bank statement was used for that transaction, the till mechanism tested, shown without argument to have been faulty. But we have Chris keep on spinning that same narrative, excess time to view a house that was not actively viewed inside or out really. But a minute approx from the entrance of that path and the sighting heading south. But, and those contradictions of course, DF was simply the bees knees as they zone in on those tiny areas he attempted with witnesses, making out of this great succession with them! Face them with the failure and it is, oh he should have done all these things, that he quite clearly could not do! Like the dog expert, faced with those statements, faced with LM's lies around position and so forth. a futile exercise to introduce some dog expert when none of them were where LM tried to claim.
And they just keep on lying, not mistakes, not errors, full on lies - What is one to do however when trying to promote a compulsive liars account? But lie along with him and add more on top. Harping on and on about "hidden" anything without PROOF, whilst we can see 100% with proof, that the only person doing any 'hiding' is of course LM, controlling to the max what his enablers put out.
