Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 683730 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3870 on: August 30, 2023, 10:55:16 PM »
Killer Luke Mitchell & His Abusive Innocence Fraud Enablers Have Hidden The Murderers Evidence From Their Cult Followers, Including His 22 Page Written Police Statement Dated 1st July 2003 & The Content Of His 4th July & 14th August 2003 & 14th April 2004 Recorded Police Interviews (Part 65)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/17/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-65/

Detective constable George Thomson asked sadistic killer Luke Mitchell

During the time you were going out with Jodi did you see other girls? Did you two-time Jodi?”

Mr Mitchell told him: “No”

He said he had not seen Kimberley since New Year and the last time he had phoned her was “about January-ish”.


He lied!

In reality killer Luke Mitchell had met up with Kimberley Thomson on 14th February 2003 and remained in contact with Kimberley Thomson, even after he had committed his murder

He had also started seeing a young girl called Kara Van Null around the time he started dating Jodi Jones in March 2003

Then there was apparently a young girl called Kimberley Tait and an 11 year old girl, also called Kimberley Thomson

Jodi Jones also suspected Luke Mitchell had cheated on her with Laura Wightman

http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/02/26/innocence-fraud-killer-luke-mitchell-confidence-trickster-sandra-leans-psychological-manipulation-boiling-you-like-a-frog-part-168/
« Last Edit: September 01, 2023, 03:18:19 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3871 on: August 30, 2023, 10:59:12 PM »
Quote from: Chris_Halkides on Today at 02:34:44 AM


Exactly, not a theory at all. Well proven that the sisters stayed together frequently, week in and out. What "a mile apart" has to do with anything I have no idea.  We also know that SK stayed over at the grans house with his girlfriend. LM also frequenting there and making it clear in the investigation that his girlfriend wore her sisters clothing, on the day of the murder to be precise!

But and again, that abundance of lies put out, how do people even begin to sift through fact from fiction with proven liars. The elder sister as pointed out before, did not move away from home at 14yrs old, she moved from the grans house at this age to the new family home. Returning to her former home when she was all but 16 if not 16. Zero loss of contact, where it has been shown that the mother saw the gran, daughter, almost daily. All clarified and backed up in that thorough investigation into others, into SK and so forth.

And again, the lie that the t-shirt was never identified as belonging to the elder sister, shown to the witness at court to do just that - Limited case papers, not every statement, no access to the investigation, no court attendance, no full court transcripts - Very much why those lies are needed one would assume, that front and pretence at all times until exposed, on repeat.

Also as stated before, the strength of the evidence and not its weakness, that had a top QC failed to produce that doubt. The presence of another connected male, his DNA, where the enablers would have you believe by way of lying that the police handed the story on a plate to him - That continuous yarn that is spun, forever snaring themselves in that web of deceit.

Two other connected males in the vicinity - All fully investigated and eliminated. The enablers stating they were eliminated immediately, when they have absolutely no way of knowing this, more fallacy on a whim.

Still stating that LM cannot release his statement from the morning of July 1st, absolutely false. He chooses not to do so - Fact.

Whilst putting together that submission to the SCCRC, the knowledge held around that claimed identity of the mystery male, knowing for a fact it is a load of nonsense, you are correct Nicholas, they were still trying to place SK as possibly being that male whilst holding that information. Still spinning out that he was only alibied by his girlfriend, yet another blatant lie. Pulled up for the lie then claiming the statement of alibi had been "buried" - Crock of BS yet again.

Let’s hear a similar request from you for the statements of the search party three to be disclosed. Then we would truly see how was telling the truth about the changes in statements over the first weeks of the case. Not that you want that, do you?  Then it would be plain to see the paucity and dishonesty of your narrative. The nakedness of the emperor would truly be exposed.

After watching a programme on the murder of Nicola Payne something struck me. Nicola on the night she disappeared walked around the same distance from her house to the house of her parents. On the way she was abducted. Within the hour when she had not arrived her frantic parents had begun to search the local area.

Contrast that with this case. Jodi had allegedly left home around 4.50 to meet Luke. Her mother believed that she was staying in Easthouses and accordingly that Luke was meeting her at the top of the path. It would have taken minutes for her to walk that distance. Yet when Luke phoned the house at 5.40 there was no reaction to her not having met him when she should have, around 50 minutes earlier. We know Ovens passed on the details of the phone call to Jodi’s mother yet none of the two reacted to the fact that Jodi was not yet with Luke . 50 minutes after leaving on a walk that should have taken less than 5 minutes there was no sign of panic that Jodi hadn’t arrived. Why not? The usual excuse is they lost track of time. How? Ovens came in from work at around the time Jodi allegedly left. He would have known how long she’d been gone. Likewise her mother who seems to have had her eye on the clock while the lasagne was in the oven. Why no panic? Why no immediate search of the area?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3872 on: August 30, 2023, 11:16:34 PM »
As did the girl he was cheating on Jodi with, Kimberley Thomson:


I’ve recently been told there were two Kimberley Thomson’s and that the above Kimberley Thomson is not the Kimberley Thomson who gave evidence during killer Luke Mitchell’s trial

« Last Edit: August 30, 2023, 11:19:00 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3873 on: August 30, 2023, 11:17:41 PM »
It's common knowledge that a full complete genetic profile can be obtained from washed semen stains -- sometimes from materials that have been washed up to 4 or 5 times -- even from minute semen deposits. There is no doubt this was raised in court and clearly explained and clarified. It's obvious the semen stain in this case hadn't degraded to the extent that a full profile could not be obtained. The said profile had migrated to other areas of Jodi's clothing and body by rainwater diffusion -- this is common sense and was clarified in court. Jodi's naked body and clothing were left lying uncovered for a full 8 hours in a woodland strip where it had rained quite heavily during the early hours. Her clothes were all bundled together in one big heap by police, rather than bagged separately. Janine even said -- as LM himself had told police --  that Jodi borrowed her clothes sometimes. And Jodi and Janine were in regular contact with each other, where Janine visted Jodi at their mother's house and Jodi visited Janine at their gran's house, even staying there sometimes. The t-shirt from where the full profile, from semen, was obtained had been freshly washed/laundered (it smelled strongly of washing detergent). SK was alibied by his father and Janine, and the latter still alibies him in the present day even though they split up many years ago. Hope that makes sense.

Is it common knowledge? Could you please provide a sample of the peer reviewed research on the subject please?

Was the evidence surrounding Kelly’s semen stain clarified in court? Unfortunately I can’t find any mention that it was. Perhaps my google is faulty? Could you please post links to the information you have found?

If Janine at any time after giving Kelly a false alibi had retracted that alibi she could have faced a criminal charge herself. Much like the woman below.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/woman-jailed-after-providing-false-statement-to-court

His father would have faced similar treatment. Why is it so hard for you to believe that Corrine would have lied for her son but Kelly’s dad wouldn’t do similar to save him?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3874 on: August 30, 2023, 11:24:01 PM »
I’ve recently been told there were two Kimberley Thomson’s and that the above Kimberley Thomson is not the Kimberley Thomson who gave evidence during killer Luke Mitchell’s trial

Two Kimberley Thomsons? You don’t say. So not only was Luke collecting girlfriends who looked alike but also had the same name. Genius.

And I presume those other ‘victims’ weren’t called to give evidence either? Turnbull certainly missed a trick there.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3875 on: August 30, 2023, 11:26:58 PM »
Two Kimberley Thomsons? You don’t say. So not only was Luke collecting girlfriends who looked alike but also had the same name. Genius.

And I presume those other ‘victims’ weren’t called to give evidence either? Turnbull certainly missed a trick there.

I’ve been told sadistic killer Luke Mitchell had “dated” an 11 year old Kimberley Thomson - who appears to have made the following post

As did the girl he was cheating on Jodi with, Kimberley Thomson:



I don’t know how old LM was at the time of his “relationship” with 11 year old Kimberley Thomson

Then there was 14 year old Kimberley Thomson who gave evidence during the trial
« Last Edit: August 30, 2023, 11:30:43 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3876 on: August 30, 2023, 11:30:43 PM »
I’ve been told sadistic killer Luke Mitchell had “dated” an 11 year old Kimberley Thomson - who appears to have made the following post

And I’ve been told that you’ve been had.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3877 on: August 30, 2023, 11:34:39 PM »
And I presume those other ‘victims’ weren’t called to give evidence either? Turnbull certainly missed a trick there.

Her post mentioned CID, suggesting the police spoke to this other Kim also

As did the girl he was cheating on Jodi with, Kimberley Thomson:


Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3878 on: August 30, 2023, 11:36:52 PM »
Her post mentioned CID, suggesting the police spoke to this other Kim also

And?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3879 on: August 30, 2023, 11:39:46 PM »
Two Kimberley Thomsons?

Three Kimberley’s

14 year old and 11 year old K Thomson’s and a Kimberley Tait
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3880 on: August 30, 2023, 11:41:30 PM »
Three Kimberley’s

14 year old and 11 year old K Thomson’s and a Kimberley Tait

And the Thomson twins.

And?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3881 on: August 30, 2023, 11:43:19 PM »
And?

You’ve suggested Alan Turnbull “missed a trick”

How so?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3882 on: August 30, 2023, 11:44:46 PM »
And the Thomson twins.

And?

I recall the 11 year old KT being referred to on a previous Internet forum
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3883 on: August 30, 2023, 11:46:09 PM »
You’ve suggested Alan Turnbull “missed a trick”

How so?

Well he had all this alleged corroborating evidence of Luke’s violence towards girls and yet used none of it.

That’s what I call missing a trick.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3884 on: August 30, 2023, 11:47:26 PM »
I recall the 11 year old KT being referred to on a previous Internet forum

I’ve heard the Loch Ness monster being referred to on an internet forum. Does that make her real?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?