Again, at least 3 other witnesses supported Leonard Kelly’s evidence - which brings the witness list up to 56
What are the names of the other missing half from the scheduled witness list
1. Leonard Kelly
2. Judith Jones
3. Janine Jones
4. Alice Walker
5. Steven Kelly
6. Alan Ovens
7. Ronald Miller
8. Craig Dobbie
9. John [Name removed]
10. Gordon [Name removed]
11. Susan Ure
12. Anthony Busuttil
13. Rosemary Walsh
14. Lorraine Flaming
15. Carol Heatlie
16. Marion O’Sullivan
17. Derek Hamilton
18. Andrew Holburn
19. Dean Houston
20. Grant Elliot
21. Ashleigh Coutts
22. Kimberley Thomson
23. Andrina Bryson
24. Shane Mitchell
25. Corinne Mitchell
26. Dc Alan Towers
27. Dc Stephen Quinn
28. Dc George Thomson
29. Robert Gilhooly,
30. Matthew Muraska
31. Rachel Quinn
32. Alexander Hamilton
33. Keith Campbell
34. Michelle Tierney
35. Alistair Leitch
36. David High
37. David Tullock
38. Michelle Lindsay
39. Derek Scrimger
40. Alan Murray
41. Mark Heron
42. Natalie Wright
43. Raymond McCloy
44. James Aitken
45. Patricia Frankland
46. Nicholas Frankland
47. George Ramage
48. Geraldine Mackie
50. Male teacher who commented on killer Luke Mitchell looking like a “hooded monk” in his now missing khaki green parka style coat
51. DI William Cravens
52. Laura Wightman - paragraphs from Laura’s July 2003 & September 2004 witness statements read to jury
53. Dc Brian Melrose
54-56. 3 witnesses who supported Leonard Kelly’s evidence
How many witnesses from FLIP in Edinburgh were called to give evidence about the replacement parka style jacket?
Killer Luke Mitchell: Around 100 Witnesses Gave Evidence During The Murderers Trial Yet The Mainstream Media Only Ever Reported on Around Half (Part 272)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/09/03/killer-luke-mitchell-over-100-witnesses-gave-evidence-during-the-murderers-trial-yet-the-mainstream-media-only-ever-reported-on-around-half-part-272/
I think the FLO Michelle Lindsay had the receipt for it as she asked for it along with other receipts from shopping items on 08.07.03, so I don't think witnesses from Flip were necessary. However, I presume the police visited Flip to ask them if they had a record or recollection of a parka being purchased by any of the Mitchell family before 30.06.03? I also presume the police had checked the bank statements of LM's immediate family members to see if there were records of any jackets or clothing bought between 2002-2003? While we are talking about those jackets, I wonder if Luke & Corinne initially tried to hide the new parka from the FLO? I suspect they did, but knew it was too risky as she was watching them with great vigilance (and therefore why CM & DF referred to her as "a fox in the henhouse"). I believe the parka was bought on the 08.07.03 with the intention of it not being seen by the FLO and if they succeeded in doing that, then they weren't going to deny that LM had a parka before the murder, pretending this new parka was the one he had before the murder. Failing that, if the new parka was spotted by the FLO, which it thankfully was, they were obviously going to deny LM ever had one before the 30.06.03, which they did, and rely on no forensic evidence being found to incriminate LM (they knew there was a very good chance no forensic evidence would have been found as they'd destroyed all the clothes LM was wearing between 1640 & 1740) and rely on no eyewitnesses seeing him in the parka (thankfully, 3 people did). He'd surreptitiously changed into that bomber between 1740 and 1800 as he couldn't risk more eyewitnesses seeing him in the parka and no pedestrian witnesses noticing traces of blood on it when they walked by him from a close distance; he also changed into the bomber to try and nullify and confuse potential eyewitnesses who may have seen him in the parka between 1640 -1740. He was covering every angle that could be used against him. He showed great cunning, calmness and foresight for such a young lad, but he underestimated the police's perception and foresight
