"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

(they knew there was a very good chance no forensic evidence would have been found as they'd destroyed all the clothes LM was wearing between 1640 & 1740) and rely on no eyewitnesses seeing him in the parka (thankfully, 3 people did). He'd surreptitiously changed into that bomber between 1740 and 1800 as he couldn't risk more eyewitnesses seeing him in the parka and no pedestrian witnesses noticing traces of blood on it when they walked by him from a close distance; he also changed into the bomber to try and nullify and confuse potential eyewitnesses who may have seen him in the parka between 1640 -1740. He was covering every angle that could be used against him. He showed great cunning, calmness and foresight for such a young lad, but he underestimated the police's perception and foresight

He most definitely was cunning, as can also be seen how he duped, conned and abused Laura Wightman

Then orchestrating that Sky TV interview after being told not to attend Jodi Jones funeral

Only to the make a complaint to the police the following day, after his victims funeral - in another early attempt to make himself appear to be a victim

[Mr Apples]

Are you sure?

I think I read it somewhere that CM herself said that she showed the FLO the receipt for the jacket purchased from Flip on 08.07.03. I'll need to go back and check.

[Mr Apples]

Wasn’t it staff at FLIP who tipped off the police about killer Luke Mitchell buying a replacement parka?

I'm not sure. I haven't read about that. Wasn't it the tattoo parlour that tipped the police off?

[Nicholas]

If it was staff at FLIP who tipped the police off - which it most definitely appears to have been - how could Michelle Lindsay have been referred to as a fox or “vixen in the henhouse” ?

Do you not recall scammer Sandra Lean making reference to this in her keeping the record straight nonsense video?

Scammer Sandra Lean stated during her keeping the record straight nonsense video at around 53:55

“Why were staff from FLIP alerting the police to a mother buying clothes for their teenage son, why would they do that, they must have hundreds of people going through the shop buying clothes, why would they alert the police”

The public were asked to look out for people acting suspiciously

[Nicholas]

I'm not sure. I haven't read about that. Wasn't it the tattoo parlour that tipped the police off?

FLIP staff definitely tipped off the police

What They Found also referred to this fact at around 27:58 in their Luke Mitchell, teen killer! video here https://youtu.be/OcedqPxuR9k?si=NViMpZrvoJzEswKB

[Nicholas]

Scammer Sandra Lean stated during her keeping the record straight nonsense video at around 53:55

“Why were staff from FLIP alerting the police to a mother buying clothes for their teenage son, why would they do that, they must have hundreds of people going through the shop buying clothes, why would they alert the police”

The public were asked to look out for people acting suspiciously

Was it killer Luke Mitchell who paid for the replacement parka or Corinne Mitchell?

What was the actual evidence from the staff at FLIP?

[Nicholas]

Was it killer Luke Mitchell who paid for the replacement parka or Corinne Mitchell?

What was the actual evidence from the staff at FLIP?

The Herald stated;

“The jury also heard that Mrs Mitchell bought her son a German Parka jacket from Flip, in Edinburgh, soon after the murder”
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12408758.warning-over-perjury-for-mother-in-jodi-murder-trial-jury-hears-questions-over-knife-bought-for-camping-trip/

When exactly did the jury hear about the German Parka from Flip and what exactly was said about it’s purchase?

How was the jacket paid for and who went up to the till to pay for it? 

[Nicholas]

I think I read it somewhere that CM herself said that she showed the FLO the receipt for the jacket purchased from Flip on 08.07.03. I'll need to go back and check.

Corinne Mitchell was lying!

FLIP staff tipped off the police about sadistic killer Luke Mitchell buying the replacement parka

What was Michelle Lindsay’s evidence regarding the replacement parka?

And again what was the evidence of FLIP staff?

[Nicholas]

What was the name of this defence witness?

Were they a colleague of Nigel Beaumont?

Ground 12
[21] The final ground of appeal which the single judge held not to be arguable concerns certain information about a possible connection between a defence witness and one of the jurors. The witness, who was an employee of the firm of solicitors acting for the applicant, gave in the course of the trial uncontroversial evidence about times taken to walk along a route from the applicant's home to certain points of significance and to run back part of the way. According to the grounds of appeal the witness subsequently informed her employers that
"she would be known to [the juror] and that there was reason to believe that [the juror] would be hostile to both her and her sister. It is believed that [the juror] may believe that [the witness's] sister caused her to lose her employment in recent times. It is submitted that [the juror] ought to have brought this matter to the attention of the court as she was well aware she was obliged to".
[22] Mr Findlay hardly submitted that this was an arguable ground of appeal. In effect he simply drew the circumstances to the court's attention against the possibility that it might regard them as suitable, in the course of the appeal, for the carrying out of further inquiry.
[23] In our view there is no basis for any such inquiry nor consequentially for allowing this ground to go forward. The witness gave uncontroversial evidence: she was not cross examined by the Advocate Depute. The substance of what she spoke to had already been the subject of testimony by other witnesses. The jury, prior to this witness giving evidence, had made an accompanied site visit to the locus and can have found nothing surprising in her evidence. There is no reason to suppose that the juror recognised the witness nor, even if she did, that that recognition impinged to any extent upon her approach to the evidence at the trial. This ground of appeal is in itself unarguable and is not rendered arguable by being taken in conjunction with any other ground of appeal. No cause has been shown for granting leave to argue it.
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=8a928aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7

[Nicholas]

What was the name of this defence witness?

Were they a colleague of Nigel Beaumont?

[21]…The witness, who was an employee of the firm of solicitors acting for the applicant, gave in the course of the trial uncontroversial evidence about times taken to walk along a route from the applicant's home to certain points of significance and to run back part of the way….
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=8a928aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7

Did the mainstream media also not report on this witness and their evidence?

[Nicholas]

I think I read it somewhere that CM herself said that she showed the FLO the receipt for the jacket purchased from Flip on 08.07.03. I'll need to go back and check.

Corinne Mitchell lied and made out Michelle Lindsay was waiting for her and her killer son Luke Mitchell when they got back from shopping

However scammer Sandra Lean confirmed in her 2nd innocence fraud IB, page 223 that Corinne was lying again

“FLO Michelle Lindsay was asking for and being provided with the receipt for the Parka and other clothing bought on 9th July.

The replacement parka was bought from FLIP on the 8th July 2003 NOT the 9th

[Nicholas]

 

Scammer Sandra Lean from IB, page 262

“It was not just Michelle Lindsay, later referred to at appeal by Donald Findlay as a “vixen in the henhouse,” who was planted in the Mitchell home in attempts to obtain information.

Two of Luke’s friends – fourteen-year-old kids - were in his house on a number of occasions when Michelle Lindsay was present. Information from both was included in Michelle Lindsay’s notes and used against Luke at trial.

Who were the two 14 year olds?

Laura Wightman and who else?

[Nicholas]

Scammer Sandra Lean from IB, page 262

“It was not just Michelle Lindsay, later referred to at appeal by Donald Findlay as a “vixen in the henhouse,” who was planted in the Mitchell home in attempts to obtain information.

Two of Luke’s friends – fourteen-year-old kids - were in his house on a number of occasions when Michelle Lindsay was present. Information from both was included in Michelle Lindsay’s notes and used against Luke at trial.

Who were the two 14 year olds?

Laura Wightman and who else?

Why didn’t mainstream media report on these two “planted” 14 year olds and what they said at the time of the trial?

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell was lying!

Corinne Mitchell also lied about how long her killer son Luke Mitchell was in a relationship with Jodi Jones

She told James English it was “about 5 months”

In reality it was less than 3 months

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell lied and made out Michelle Lindsay was waiting for her and her killer son Luke Mitchell when they got back from shopping

However scammer Sandra Lean confirmed in her 2nd innocence fraud IB, page 223 that Corinne was lying again

“FLO Michelle Lindsay was asking for and being provided with the receipt for the Parka and other clothing bought on 9th July.

The replacement parka was bought from FLIP on the 8th July 2003 NOT the 9th

Corinne Mitchell can be heard telling another one of her fantastical stories about FLO Michelle Lindsay and the parka receipt at around 25:00 during the James English video

Corinne pretended Michelle Lindsay arrived at her house just before she left for Flip in Edinburgh with her killer son Luke Mitchell and then pretended that Michelle Lindsay was waiting for them both when they got back

This is yet more lies and nonsense

Again, FLIP staff tipped the police off that killer Luke had bought a replacement parka jacket on the 8th July 2003