"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

What was the exact time doctor Kranti Hiremath arrived at the police station?

What was the name of the doctor who attended sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s crime scene?

Scammer Sandra Lean stated in her second innocence fraud book IB, page 250

“..the doctor attended to pronounce death, all before 3am

Did doctor Kranti Hiremath go to Dalkeith police station to meet a police officer who then took her to sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s crime scene?

[Mr Apples]

Regarding the knife and knife pouch that were found in the Mitchell household on 14.04.04 ... was it established that the knife did not belong to that pouch? Was it ascertained that the knife --  bought in December '03 -- was without an accompanying pouch, and the knife pouch belonged to the  knife that was the murder weapon that LM owned before 30.06.03? Did the police on 14.04.04 test to see if the knife & knife pouch found that day fitted each other?

[Nicholas]

What was the name of the doctor who attended sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s crime scene?

Scammer Sandra Lean stated in her second innocence fraud book IB, page 250

“..the doctor attended to pronounce death, all before 3am

Did doctor Kranti Hiremath go to Dalkeith police station to meet a police officer who then took her to sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s crime scene?

doctor Kranti Hiremath here
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/17/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-64/

Scammer Sandra Lean stated on 16th September 2022 “..the only doctor brought in that night was one whose task it was to find any evidence to suggest that Luke might have been involved in Jodi’s murder”

So did dr Kranti Hiremath attend killer Luke Mitchell’s crime scene “to pronounce death”?

[Nicholas]

Regarding the knife and knife pouch that were found in the Mitchell household on 14.04.04 ... was it established that the knife did not belong to that pouch?

Yes

It was a Jack Pyke knife pouch found in sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s bedroom on 14th April 2004

The replacement knife doesn’t appear to have been a Jack Pyke knife

Was it ascertained that the knife --  bought in December '03 -- was without an accompanying pouch,

Did the replacement knife even come with a leather pouch?

It could have arrived packaged with cardboard surrounding the blade

Did the police on 14.04.04 test to see if the knife & knife pouch found that day fitted each other?

This would have been investigated also

Why would a generic skunting knife be in a Jack Pyke leather pouch?

This would have also been established during the killers trial, and another relevant detail not reported on

[Nicholas]

More on doctor Kranti Hiremath here
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/17/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-64/

Did Alan Cauldwell question dr Kranti Hiremath?

[Mr Apples]

Yes

It was a Jack Pyke knife pouch found in sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s bedroom on 14th April 2004

The replacement knife doesn’t appear to have been a Jack Pyke knife

Did that knife even come with a leather pouch?

This would have been investigated also

I know the invoice from the company in Leeds showed that the goods purchased was signed for by C Mitchell and purchased using her visa debit card on December '03. The invoice also showed that a knife was purchased but did not show a knife pouch was purchased (and I doubt that a knife pouch came with the knife for free). I presume the police tested the knife and pouch they found on 14.04.04 to see if they fitted? I presume they did not fit?

[Nicholas]

Regarding the knife and knife pouch that were found in the Mitchell household on 14.04.04 ... was it established that the knife did not belong to that pouch?

Again this was established during the trial

And again - not reported on

 

[Nicholas]

I presume they did not fit?

Can you expand on what you mean by “they did not fit”

[Mr Apples]

Can you expand on what you mean by “they did not fit”

Putting the knife inside the pouch to see if it was a tight or loose fit; basically to obtain further evidence that they weren't a pairing and that the knife that matched with the pouch was still missing.

[Nicholas]

Did Alan Cauldwell question dr Kranti Hiremath?

Did Alan Caudwell ask dr Kranti Hiremath if Jodi Jones could have caused the injuries to sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s shins after kicking him?

[Nicholas]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.4560.html

(Luke’s clothing, am I correct in saying this was meant to be the same clothes he wore to school that day that he was still in that night? If so who corroborated this?) Quote Bullseye.

Sadistic killer Luke Mitchell made no mention of changing his clothes once he got home from school, ergo he met Jodi Jones in the clothes he was wearing to school on Monday - along with his parka jacket over the top

He then went home to burn and change his clothes before heading to the abbey

[Nicholas]

Putting the knife inside the pouch to see if it was a tight or loose fit; basically to obtain further evidence that they weren't a pairing and that the knife that matched with the pouch was still missing.

That’s what I thought you meant

Why would a generic skunting knife come in a leather Jack Pyke knife pouch?

The same knife pouch Laura Wightman had seen killer Luke Mitchell with in pizza hut on 27th June 2003

[Mr Apples]

Sadistic killer Luke Mitchell made no mention of changing his clothes once he got home from school, ergo he met Jodi Jones in the clothes he was wearing to school on Monday - along with his parka jacket over the top

He then went home to burn and change his clothes before heading to the abbey

Do you think LM went home immediately after the RW/LF sighting at 1740 and quickly changed his jacket (from the parka into the bomber jacket) and was back on the Newbattle Road for 1800 or just after it? Or, do you think he'd  pre-planned the murder and had the bomber planked/hidden in the woodlands behind that gate? I think the former scenario is much more plausible. He was very fortunate that no one from his scheme or street saw him going home at 1745 in that parka or going back out in the bomber jacket at just before 1800 (obviously many people saw him on nb rd between 1800-1825, but it doesn't appear anyone saw him leaving his house in the bomber jacket just before 1800). I also wonder if he'd told CM something was wrong between 1745 and just before 1800? Or likely waited until he returned home again at approx. 1830? Probably the latter, imo.

[Nicholas]

Do you think LM went home immediately after the RW/LF sighting at 1740 and quickly changed his jacket (from the parka into the bomber jacket) and was back on the Newbattle Road for 1800 or just after it? Or, do you think he'd  pre-planned the murder and had the bomber planked/hidden in the woodlands behind that gate?

He appears to have fantasised about committing murder

So it’s very possible it was pre-planned

Do you think he had taken gloves and his balaclava with him when he left Newbattle Abbey crescent?

Could that be what was bulging in his jacket pocket?

[Nicholas]

Do you think LM went home immediately after the RW/LF sighting at 1740 and quickly changed his jacket (from the parka into the bomber jacket) and was back on the Newbattle Road for 1800 or just after it?

I do think he went home to change his clothes and footwear, for sure