"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

I also wonder if he'd told CM something was wrong between 1745 and just before 1800? Or likely waited until he returned home again at approx. 1830? Probably the latter, imo.

Corinne Mitchell appears to have known her son had murdered Jodi Jones when she asked the police if he was a suspect

She most definitely knew he was lying when she was sat next to him, whilst he was giving that 22 page written witness statement in Dalkeith police station

[Mr Apples]

Sadistic killer Luke Mitchell made no mention of changing his clothes once he got home from school, ergo he met Jodi Jones in the clothes he was wearing to school on Monday - along with his parka jacket over the top

He then went home to burn and change his clothes before heading to the abbey

Completely agree. When he went back home at 1830, I think he changed everything - jeans, t-shirt and boots. I think he told CM at this point something bad had happened (he probably even told her Jodi was dead at this point, but not 100% certain) and he desperately needed her help. He may have had a quick was at the bathhroom sink upstairs, confident that he had very little to no blood traces at all on his person; either that or he used the freshwater streams in that woodland behind that gate, not risking any blood traces or incriminating forensic evidence being left in his upstairs bathroom. A whole new change of clothing and a hasty wash somewhere out of sight were the reasons one of the boys he met up with in the abbey at 1930 testified in court he was looking more cleaner and less unkempt than normal. He then had ample time -- between 1930 and that first contact from JudJ -- to re-dirty his person.

[Nicholas]

What did sadistic killer Luke Mitchell tell police had happened to his shins?

He didn’t play any sport, going by all the accounts, and he had been at school on the Monday, with no reported incidents involving his shins

So the shin abrasions appear to be linked to his murder

[Mr Apples]

I do think he went home to change his clothes and footwear, for sure

Do you think he changed his jeans, t-shirt and footwear between 1740-1800 or between 1830-1930. I think the latter is more likely. Obviously he changed jackets between 1740-1800. What did the 6 eyewitnesses say about LM's footwear between 1800-1830? They all described his green bomber jacket and black baggy jeans, but what did they say about his footwear at this point?

[Nicholas]

Do you think he changed his jeans, t-shirt and footwear between 1740-1800 or between 1830-1930.

Did he wear jeans to school that day?

Thought he was still wearing his school trousers?

[Nicholas]

What did the 6 eyewitnesses say about LM's footwear between 1800-1830?

There were 9 witnesses

Who all appear to have said he was wearing dark coloured footwear

[Nicholas]

…and black baggy jeans

We’re the “trousers” found hidden in the holdall alao black baggy jeans?

[Mr Apples]

Did he wear jeans to school that day?

Thought he was still wearing his school trousers?

Don't know. Wasn't he in the habit of not conforming to conventional school attire? If he did have black school trousers on, I think he changed into black baggy jeans when he got in from school. I also think he changed into another pair of black baggy jeans between 1830-1930.

[Mr Apples]

There were 9 witnesses

Who all appear to have said he was wearing dark coloured footwear

I'm talking about the second time he was on the nb rd, between 1800-1830, wearing the green bomber jacket. 3 pushbike boys, mo/dh and ch.

[Nicholas]

Completely agree. When he went back home at 1830, I think he changed everything - jeans, t-shirt and boots. I think he told CM at this point something bad had happened (he probably even told her Jodi was dead at this point, but not 100% certain)

It’s very possible he had told his mother he had committed murder

Would explain why she sent him out pretending to look for Jodi Jones after 10pm

[Nicholas]

I'm talking about the second time he was on the nb rd, between 1800-1830, wearing the green bomber jacket. 3 pushbike boys, mo/dh and ch.

What footwear did he usually wear for school, do you know?

[Mr Apples]

What footwear did he usually wear for school, do you know?

Not sure.

[Nicholas]

Scammer Sandra Lean stated on 16th September 2022 “..the only doctor brought in that night was one whose task it was to find any evidence to suggest that Luke might have been involved in Jodi’s murder”

So did dr Kranti Hiremath attend killer Luke Mitchell’s crime scene “to pronounce death”?

Scammer Sandra Lean from IB, page 207 referring to dr Kranti Hiremath

“According to the police surgeon, Luke’s nails were dirty..”

“Dr Kranti stated that her job is to visit crime scenes, to examine the victim or the accused, and to give an impartial forensic report.
https://theinterviewportal.com/2017/08/24/forensic-medical-examiner-interview/

So did dr Kranti Hiremath visit killer Luke Mitchell’s crime scene “to pronounce death” or did another doctor do this?

[Nicholas]

Dr Kranti stated that her job is to visit crime scenes, to examine the victim or the accused, and to give an impartial forensic report.
[/color] https://theinterviewportal.com/2017/08/24/forensic-medical-examiner-interview/

So did dr Kranti Hiremath visit killer Luke Mitchell’s crime scene “to pronounce death” or did another doctor do this?

“At the conclusion of the interview with the accused, which was not under caution and in respect of which evidence had been led without objection, he agreed to the taking of his clothes by the police and the examination of his person and the taking of a blood sample by a police surgeon

Court Of Appeal Judgement Suggests Inconsistency In Murderers Mother Corinne Mitchell’s Story Via Channel 5’s 2021 “Murder In A Small Town” Innocence Fraud TV Show, Narrated By Lucy Briers
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/07/22/killer-luke-mitchell-court-of-appeal-judgement-suggests-inconsistency-in-murderers-mother-corinne-mitchells-story-via-channel-5s-2021-murder-in-a-small-town-innoce/

[faithlilly]

“At the conclusion of the interview with the accused, which was not under caution and in respect of which evidence had been led without objection, he agreed to the taking of his clothes by the police and the examination of his person and the taking of a blood sample by a police surgeon

Court Of Appeal Judgement Suggests Inconsistency In Murderers Mother Corinne Mitchell’s Story Via Channel 5’s 2021 “Murder In A Small Town” Innocence Fraud TV Show, Narrated By Lucy Briers
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/07/22/killer-luke-mitchell-court-of-appeal-judgement-suggests-inconsistency-in-murderers-mother-corinne-mitchells-story-via-channel-5s-2021-murder-in-a-small-town-innoce/

The 2008 Court of Appeal judgement also said that Judith Jones contacted Luke for the first time at 10.41pm so, by your reasoning, that must be right,right?