"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Or Jodi Jones had found out about any one of sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s other girlfriends

Kimberley Thomson 14
Kara Van Null
Kimberley Tait
Laura Wightman
Gemma Chapman

Isn’t this Gemma with Nicola Brennan Aka Nicky Brendan https://www.facebook.com/barbietilly

[Nicholas]

“Corinne and Shane Mitchell were charged with attempting to pervert the course of justice on the basis that they “lied” to investigators (the charges were later dropped).” ~ scammer Sandra Lean page 99

They did lie to the investigators!

And if you had attended the trial Sandra Lean you would have known this and that the charges of attempting to pervert the course of justice were dropped - in front of the jury

More bare faced lies!

 

[Nicholas]

Who the feck cares, what does that have to do with the murder of [Name removed]??

Projection

https://www.psychopathfree.com/articles/psychopaths-and-projection.166/

[Nicholas]

Psychopath Shaun Attwood to scammer Sandra Lean

“There are people in this world who like to insert themselves into cases

Why did you “insert” yourself into this case Sandra Lean?

[Nicholas]

scammer Sandra Lean 29th October 2023 (YouTube)

“The second thing I have a real issue with”

“I have a huge issue with individuals who will use vulnerable people, exploit them to do their own dirty work, whilst hiding behind either anonymous or fake profiles..  ” ~ narcissist Sandra Lean 29th Oct 2023 (YouTube)

How many “anonymous or fake profiles” are you knowingly aware of and regularly communicate with Sandra 🙄

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean 3 hours ago
Absolutely - enormous thanks to Richard Bell - a question that no-one else ever asked in 20 years and suddenly - BAM! A whole new area that's never been examined - and a lot of questions about why not!!!


It was “examined” and investigated by the police back in 2003 Sandra Lean! BAM!

Sandra Lean
Stuart Henderson Richard Bell - that's way more than anyone else thought of!!! Don't you see? One person, thinking outside the box, can make such a massive difference - you came up with a question that NOBODY ever thought to ask, in over 20 years. Yet, it's revealed, potentially, another massive hole in the case. I can't thank you enough - to have a new avenue open after all this time is quite unbelievable!!!

 

[Nicholas]

Isn’t this Gemma with Nicola Brennan Aka Nicky Brendan https://www.facebook.com/barbietilly

Girlfriend of Jodi's killer speaks of her love for him - The Scotsman - May 2005

LUKE MITCHELL'S secret girlfriend has spoken of her love for the teenage murderer.

‘Gemma Chapman, 17, described the convicted killer as "kind, caring and loving" and said he was wrongly found guilty of 14-year-old Jodi Jones' horrific murder on Roan's Dyke Path in Dalkeith.

In comments echoing those of Mitchell's defence at his trial, Ms Chapman, who lives with her parents near Edinburgh, said in a letter to a friend: "I could go on all day telling of four or five different people who could have murdered Jodi and the funny thing is, all of them would have more evidence to prove it was them than Luke did."

She said it was very painful being separated from the convicted killer, who was found guilty of slashing Jodi's throat about 20 times before mutilating her body.

The judge called the killing "one of the worst cases of murder of a single victim to have come before the court in many years".

Ms Chapman said: "It's so painful being away from the man I love and I feel angry because I don't know the truth and I'm still standing by him."

But she admitted she was frightened her loyalty could be misplaced.

She said: "I'm confused and very scared of making the wrong choices.

"I don't want him to be guilty and wasting my time with him."

https://www.scotsman.com/news/girlfriend-jodis-killer-speaks-her-love-him-2512833

Sadly her loyalty remains misplaced

She was ”hoovered” back in by the murdering psychopath and his toxic enablers innocence fraud

‘Hoovering, hoovered, hoover manoeuvre ⬇️
‘The hoover maneuver is an attempt to see if a prior target of abuse can be conned into another cycle of abuse, resulting in the abusive person reclaiming a sense of power and control by causing pain (emotional and sometimes physical) to a target.
https://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/hoover-maneuver-the-dirty-secret-of-emotional-abuse-0219154

hoovers ‘by proxy’ too

’5 Ways Malignant Narcissists 'Hoover' Their Victims’ https://psychcentral.com/blog/recovering-narcissist/2019/12/5-ways-malignant-narcissists-hoover-their-victims#1
‘This type of Hoover normally occurs when the narcissist has already drained his or her current sources of narcissistic supply or wants to tap into the resources of a prior victim. In order to regain control over the previous victim, the narcissist will claim that they “miss” and “love” you, that they simply cannot live without you, or that they need your help with something (usually a manufactured emergency or fabricated illness).

‘Narcissists may Hoover in a number of ways: by provoking the victim, waxing poetically about how they’ve changed, or even more sadistically, flaunting a new partner to their previous one after a particularly callous silent treatment or discard.

The most sadistic of narcissists will go out of their way to use their Hoover to inflict even more cruelty and damage on their former victims, especially if they see those victims start to move forward with their lives

[Kenmair]

Why did you “insert” yourself into this case Sandra?

Good point. Or you could ask why did CM ask (or allow) someone running a new age health shop for help. Would you not try a private investigator first? (not the Channel 5 jokers)

[Nicholas]

Isn’t this Gemma with Nicola Brennan Aka Nicky Brendan https://www.facebook.com/barbietilly

Nicola Brennan Aka Nicky Brendan sounds like that fraudster & “lawyer” Scott C Forbes

Nicola Brennan - Facebook 19th October 2022
Here is where they went wrong;

1. Shane Mitchell was TOLD he had been ”watching porn”. He never agreed to this. What came up on his computer were proven in the case files to be pop ups. We all remember those don’t we? Unfortunately, Shane Mitchell didn’t recall this on the stand when being TOLD he had viewed porn on his computer when in reality he was viewing car websites and that was his statement. His best response to the accusation of watching it was “might’ve been”.

It’s very telling that they couldn’t quote Shane Mitchell and the Prosecution verbatim on this issue…because the reality of the questioning and the answers doesn’t fit the narrative being sold.

2. You can’t be charged with perjury if you haven’t perjured yourself on the witness stand, much less when you haven’t been on the stand to begin with. Corinne and Shane Mitchell were charged with perverting the course of justice. Those charges were dropped at court before Corinne Mitchell gave her evidence - the only time she ever took the stand - without the jury being informed because legally, that was not a requirement even though the media had reported on this charge already.

Nicola Brennan why don’t you ask Gemma Chapman to ask killer Luke Mitchell to tell you both what was said during the trial regarding what you have written - which is all wrong btw

[Nicholas]

Good point. Or you could ask why did CM ask (or allow) someone running a new age health shop for help. Would you not try a private investigator first? (not the Channel 5 jokers)

There’s bound to be more to fraudster Sandra Lean’s story

Why didn’t Sandra attend the killers trial?

Gemma Chapman did - although it’s not clear on what days Gemma was there, apart from that day she recognised the mother of one of her ex boyfriends on the jury

[8] The final two sentences of that passage refer to an event which occurred during the aborted trial. On the fourth day of that trial investigations revealed that a girl who in effect regarded the applicant as her current boyfriend had had as a previous boyfriend the son of one of the jurors. On being questioned about this by the trial judge, the juror stated that she was aware that the girl had been her son's girlfriend and that the relationship had come to an end but appeared to be genuinely surprised that the girl now regarded the applicant as her boyfriend. After hearing counsel the trial judge discharged that juror. It is, however, quite clear that she was discharged on objective grounds, not because of any failure on her part to disclose a matter within her knowledge. (Source [2006] HCJHC 84 Appeal No. XC90/05)

What day(s) were you at the Edinburgh high ciourt Gemma?

What day was this footage taken
👇

Who is the female filmed with Corinne Mitchell at around 19:17 (seemingly holding hands) here
👇
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-m-zHEUOFR0

This was you wasn’t it Gemma?

[Nicholas]

There’s bound to be more to fraudster Sandra Lean’s story

Why didn’t Sandra attend the killers trial?

Gemma Chapman did - although it’s not clear on what days Gemma was there, apart from that day she recognised the mother of one of her ex boyfriends on the jury

[8] The final two sentences of that passage refer to an event which occurred during the aborted trial. On the fourth day of that trial investigations revealed that a girl who in effect regarded the applicant as her current boyfriend had had as a previous boyfriend the son of one of the jurors. On being questioned about this by the trial judge, the juror stated that she was aware that the girl had been her son's girlfriend and that the relationship had come to an end but appeared to be genuinely surprised that the girl now regarded the applicant as her boyfriend. After hearing counsel the trial judge discharged that juror. It is, however, quite clear that she was discharged on objective grounds, not because of any failure on her part to disclose a matter within her knowledge. (Source [2006] HCJHC 84 Appeal No. XC90/05)

What day(s) were you at the Edinburgh high ciourt Gemma?

What day was this footage taken
👇
This was you wasn’t it Gemma?

How many fake social media accounts do you have Gemma and was scammer Sandra Lean referring to you as a “mischief maker”?

Are you a “mischief maker” Gemma similar to Nicola Brennan?

[Nicholas]

Why did fraudster Sandra Lean mention money and trial transcripts and state that obtaining them was a “pointless exercise”?

The transcription of trial transcripts can be paid for from the public purse by order of a judge

On obtaining trial transcripts:

“It’s a pointless exercise” - “the transcripts themselves would not take us anywhere”

“Every day spent faffing around wasting time, is another day he’s stuck in there” ~ scammer Sandra Lean 29th October 2023 (YouTube)

 

“The second thing I have a real issue with”

“I have a huge issue with individuals who will use vulnerable people, exploit them to do their own dirty work, whilst hiding behind either anonymous or fake profiles and doing so to try to prove a point rather than take the case forward - that to me is despicable, absolutely despicable  ” ~ narcissist Sandra Lean 29th Oct 2023 (YouTube)

Killer Luke Mitchell: Transcript Of Toxic Abuser & Scammer Sandra Lean’s 29th October 2023 Nonsense Courtesy Of Nicola Brennan Aka Nicky Brendan
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/11/01/killer-luke-mitchell-transcript-of-toxic-abuser-scammer-sandra-leans-29th-october-2023-catch-up-courtesy-of-nicola-brennan-aka-nicky-brendan/

[Nicholas]

This 👇 leads back to you Sandra Lean

Nicola Brennan - Facebook 19th October 2022
Here is where they went wrong;

1. Shane Mitchell was TOLD he had been ”watching porn”. He never agreed to this. What came up on his computer were proven in the case files to be pop ups. We all remember those don’t we? Unfortunately, Shane Mitchell didn’t recall this on the stand when being TOLD he had viewed porn on his computer when in reality he was viewing car websites and that was his statement. His best response to the accusation of watching it was “might’ve been”.

It’s very telling that they couldn’t quote Shane Mitchell and the Prosecution verbatim on this issue…because the reality of the questioning and the answers doesn’t fit the narrative being sold.

2. You can’t be charged with perjury if you haven’t perjured yourself on the witness stand, much less when you haven’t been on the stand to begin with. Corinne and Shane Mitchell were charged with perverting the course of justice. Those charges were dropped at court before Corinne Mitchell gave her evidence - the only time she ever took the stand - without the jury being informed because legally, that was not a requirement even though the media had reported on this charge already.

“Corinne and Shane Mitchell were charged with attempting to pervert the course of justice on the basis that they “lied” to investigators (the charges were later dropped).” ~ scammer Sandra Lean page 99

They did lie to the investigators!

And if you had attended the trial Sandra you would have known this and that the charges of attempting to pervert the course of justice were dropped - in front of the jury

More bare faced lies!

 

[Nicholas]

Nicky Brendan
Hang fire 🔥 everyone. Sandra is going to advise when we roll. Apologies. Just need to get protest out the way first so we can manage everything properly

Is Nicola Brennan referring to managing the money “properly”?

Why doesn’t killer Luke Mitchell make an application to the SCCRC - no money needed

What a bunch of fraudsters!

[Nicholas]

Nicky Brendan
Hang fire 🔥 everyone. Sandra is going to advise when we roll. Apologies. Just need to get protest out the way first so we can manage everything properly

Why do you need scammer Sandra Lean to “advise” you Nicola Brennan - didn’t she say someone else would be taking care of the money this time round?

She’s was lying again wasn’t she

She’s still orchestrating it all

Oh dear