"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[faithlilly]

What time exactly did killer Luke Mitchell arrive at the Abbey?

I was indeed out by half an hour

What did killer Luke Mitchell tell the police about the downpour of rain that night?

You were indeed out by at least half an hour.

By accident or design?

[Nicholas]

The witnesses names from those 👆🏽transcripts appear to be

David Stirling or David Suttie

Who was/is David S?

Alan Turnbull: We heard from a boy for instance called David S, you probably don’t know him?

Corinne Mitchell: David who sorry

Alan Turnbull: David S?

Corinne Mitchell: No

Alan Turnbull: You see, he told us that although he knew Luke just to nod to, he wasn’t a friend of Luke’s. And that he had come across Luke one day - probably about the beginning of June - up at the area of Roan’s Dyke path and that Luke was on his push bike. And Luke certainly had a push bike, didn’t he?

Corinne Mitchell: Yes, but until such time it became unusable


Did David S say what colour the killers bike was?

[Nicholas]

The Parka Jacket and Witnesses
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/the-parka-jacket-and-witnesses.html?m=1

The author of the above has been deceptive

They state;

“There are eight witnesses mentioned in the transcripts on 13/01/05 but a borrowed jacket theory was also discussed”

The “borrowed jacket theory” was conjured up by fraudster Forbes?

[93] The evidence in relation to the parka, the knife and the discovery of the deceased could only be negated by an innocent explanation from the appellant. He had failed to offer such an explanation or it had been negated by other evidence.
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=e2988aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7

If killer Luke Mitchell had borrowed anyones jacket, on numerous occasions (as described in the snippets of those transcripts) he would have said so back in 2003 - he didn’t!

Plus Corinne Mitchell told James English her killer son “didn’t wear jackets” - even though he had a bunch of them hanging on the back of his bedroom door

[Nicholas]

The Parka Jacket and Witnesses
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/the-parka-jacket-and-witnesses.html?m=1

The author also states;

“It is common belief that there was no evidence of Luke having owned a parka jacket before 30/06/2003”

 

and

“This blog is not intended to support guilt or innocence”

Who are they kidding

[Nicholas]

Charges Against Corrine Dropped
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/charges-against-corrine-dropped.html?m=1


“It has been said in various sources, that the jury were not informed of Corrine's charges being dropped. The decision is explained here by the Advocate Depute and the jury were not removed prior to this”


Was this written by a friend of Corinne Mitchell’s?

Why “Corrine’s” as opposed to Corinne Mitchell’s?

[Nicholas]

Did Shane say that he saw Luke?
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/did-shane-say-that-he-saw-luke.html?m=1

[Nicholas]

Did Shane say that he saw Luke?
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/did-shane-say-that-he-saw-luke.html?m=1

The author states at the foot of the above;

“The processing of data may also come under section 1 of Data protection act 2018, no 10 - protecting the public against dishonesty”

Yet there are only 7 pieces of “data” - which appear to be 5-6 full pages - and there would have been many, many more pages of data related to Shane Mitchell and his evidence.

Who is being dishonest and how does publishing incomplete pages of data, with an obvious number of pages omitted,  protect the public from dishonesty?

[Nicholas]

Did Shane say that he saw Luke?
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/did-shane-say-that-he-saw-luke.html?m=1

The author also states;

“These sections relate to Shane explaining whether he had seen his brother in the house or not”

Were there more “sections” which related to “Shane explaining whether he had seen his brother in the house or not” ?

Didn’t Shane Mitchell go on to agree, that his killer brother Luke Mitchell was not in the house as opposed to “I don’t remember” ?

[Nicholas]

Referring to his mother Corinne Mitchell, Shane Mitchell told the police:

“I can’t remember what she said, I normally switch-off, she talks…”

“…I normally switch off if she talks bad about a customer, ie if a customer doesn’t like dogs she doesn’t like them”

[Bullseye]

TJ C
@TJC1419439
Luke Mitchell trial transcripts - the Parka and the witnesses
New info
…https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/the-parka-jacket-and-witnesses.html…
#lukemitchell
#justiceforjodijones
#justiceforlukemitchell
2:41 PM · Nov 5, 2023
https://twitter.com/TJC1419439/status/1721175836118659390

Looks like it been deleted from twitter?

[Nicholas]

Did Shane say that he saw Luke?
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/did-shane-say-that-he-saw-luke.html?m=1

These “sections” (in the above) appear to be Alan Turnbull going over Shane Mitchell’s statements he made to the police

Where are the “sections” in which Shane Mitchell’s evidence is put to the test, to see if it stands up or not?

[Nicholas]

The author of the above has been deceptive

They state;

“There are eight witnesses mentioned in the transcripts on 13/01/05 but a borrowed jacket theory was also discussed”

The “borrowed jacket theory” was conjured up by fraudster Forbes?

[93] The evidence in relation to the parka, the knife and the discovery of the deceased could only be negated by an innocent explanation from the appellant. He had failed to offer such an explanation or it had been negated by other evidence.
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=e2988aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7

If killer Luke Mitchell had borrowed anyones jacket, on numerous occasions (as described in the snippets of those transcripts) he would have said so back in 2003 - he didn’t!

Plus Corinne Mitchell told James English her killer son “didn’t wear jackets” - even though he had a bunch of them hanging on the back of his bedroom door

catmu 🐱🐈🐈‍⬛🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳
@suzyhal35224037
It's the kind of things kids do - swap jackets 🤷‍♀️ Did it myself and have watched my own kids do it 🤷‍♀️ So yes, if there was a parka prior to trial I believe the same - it was his mates hence the extra warrant and Craig Dobbie lying on Oath 🤷‍♀️
8:54 PM · Nov 5, 2023

Justice for Luke Mitchell and Jodi Jones
@SharonIndy_[Name removed]LM
Yeah exactly and Corinne said she was glad he got the Parka, I think getting him to wear a jacket was hellish like most teens lol
9:15 PM · Nov 5, 2023
https://twitter.com/SharonIndy_[Name removed]LM/status/1721275180075425843

 

[Nicholas]

Who was/is David S?

Alan Turnbull: We heard from a boy for instance called David S, you probably don’t know him?

Corinne Mitchell: David who sorry

Alan Turnbull: David S?

Corinne Mitchell: No

Alan Turnbull: You see, he told us that although he knew Luke just to nod to, he wasn’t a friend of Luke’s. And that he had come across Luke one day - probably about the beginning of June - up at the area of Roan’s Dyke path and that Luke was on his push bike. And Luke certainly had a push bike, didn’t he?

Corinne Mitchell: Yes, but until such time it became unusable


Did David S say what colour the killers bike was?

This 👆🏽sounds like David Stirling

“A witness David Stirling described an occasion in early June 2003 when he was with friends and they met the appellant at the junction of the paths.

They went down the inside of the wall (towards the "V") for some distance, then sat and smoked cannabis.

Another witness, John [Name removed], said that on two occasions when the appellant telephoned asking for quantities of cannabis, they arranged to meet at the opening in the wall at the junction of the paths.

On one of these occasions when they met the appellant said that he was waiting for Jodi.

For all these reasons there is no merit in this ground of appeal. (Bottom of para 162 https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=e2988aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7)

Scammer Sandra Lean hasn’t mentioned David Stirling

Sandra Lean
In their earliest statements, JF and GD "volunteered" stories about Luke and various pushbikes.
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg386893.html#msg386893

If David Stirling was an acquaintance of John F erris, would he also have known of killer Luke Mitchell’s missing bike - not to be confused with the old one which was found in the Mitchell’s garage hanging up on a wall or something

Did Luke Mitchell supply David Stirling with cannabis?

What bike did David Stirling tell police killer Luke Mitchell was using, presumably to go out and sell cannabis, at the beginning of June?

[Nicholas]

Who was/is David S?

Alan Turnbull: We heard from a boy for instance called David S, you probably don’t know him?

Corinne Mitchell: David who sorry

Alan Turnbull: David S?

Corinne Mitchell: No

Alan Turnbull: You see, he told us that although he knew Luke just to nod to, he wasn’t a friend of Luke’s. And that he had come across Luke one day - probably about the beginning of June - up at the area of Roan’s Dyke path and that Luke was on his push bike. And Luke certainly had a push bike, didn’t he?

Corinne Mitchell: Yes, but until such time it became unusable


Did David S say what colour the killers bike was?

Why did Corinne Mitchell need to tell the jury that killer Luke Mitchell’s bike had “become unusable”?

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean
In their earliest statements, JF and GD "volunteered" stories about Luke and various pushbikes.
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg386893.html#msg386893

What did David Stirling say about killer Luke Mitchell’s push bike in his earliest statement Sandra?