"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Her house of cards is slowly falling

What appears clear is that sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell’s behaviour is being monitored, especially in relation to the “vulnerable” women he is choosing to target - with the help of his enabler Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Slowly the slightly more curious among the pro-LM campaign will realise they've been lied to for Lean's benefit only.

This scam has benefitted killer Luke Mitchell and his mother Corrinne Mitchell as well as Sandra Lean & others

Some of them may eventually realise that “the samples” nonsense is just that - nonsense

Maybe members of the public will go on to obtain the trial transcripts relating to forensics, so they can see for themselves what they haven’t been told

[Nicholas]

“When did Luke's mum hand in the missing knife?”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/when-was-knife-from-pouch-handed-in-to.html

Here’s what liar and con artist Scott C Forbes said about the knife https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=957&v=k56t9NSL10M&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2F&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY&feature=emb_logo

[Nicholas]

The Parka Jacket and Witnesses
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/the-parka-jacket-and-witnesses.html?m=1

Scammer Sandra Lean from her first discredited book “No Smoke”

“A great deal was made of the "fact" that a parka jacket that Luke had been wearing that night had disappeared, "burned," the prosecution claimed, in a log burner in the back garden by Luke‟s mother Corrine

“The ludicrous (and completely unsubstantiated) claim by the prosecution was that Corinne Mitchell had burned the parka jacket her son had been wearing that night, then gone out and bought him an identical one to cover up for the "missing" one. ”

 


When during killer Luke Mitchell’s trial did the prosecution claim this Sandra?

[Nicholas]

The Parka Jacket and Witnesses
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/the-parka-jacket-and-witnesses.html?m=1

Scammer Sandra Lean from her first discredited book “No Smoke”

“The necessary proof that Luke owned a parka jacket prior to Jodi‟s death was never produced”[/i]

As well as the witnesses who gave evidence during killer Luke Mitchell’s trial,about the missing parka jackets, how many other witnesses made statements Sandra?

[Nicholas]

Scammer Sandra Lean from her first discredited book “No Smoke”

“The "fact" that Shane said Luke was not at home between 5pm and 5.45pm” http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/02/08/copy-of-chapter-from-sandra-leans-1st-discredited-smoke-mirrors-book-promoting-the-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-of-actually-factually-guilty-killer-luke-mitchell/

Where did Sandra Lean get 5:45pm from?

Scammer Sandra Lean from her first discredited book “No Smoke”

“For Corinne Mitchell to have received the clothes to be burned in the back garden, it has to be accepted that Luke must have returned home prior to his appearance on the wall at the end of the road at 5.45pm”

Shane Mitchell would have had time for fires in the back garden Sandra Lean

Shane didn’t leave the house until “just after” 6:20pm - which was the time he phoned Gary Coyle

“There is not, and has never been, any suggestion that Corinne Mitchell collected clothing from anywhere else that evening

What about Shane Mitchell?

[Nicholas]

Scammer Sandra Lean from her first discredited book “No Smoke”

“A great deal was made of the "fact" that a parka jacket that Luke had been wearing that night had disappeared, "burned," the prosecution claimed, in a log burner in the back garden by Luke‟s mother Corrine

“The ludicrous (and completely unsubstantiated) claim by the prosecution was that Corinne Mitchell had burned the parka jacket her son had been wearing that night, then gone out and bought him an identical one to cover up for the "missing" one. ”

 


When during killer Luke Mitchell’s trial did the prosecution claim this Sandra?

Sandra Lean - Was the “nutty” theory John Smythe referred to started by you, killer Luke Mitchell and his mother Corinne Mitchell?

John Smythe
If the unnamed relative wants to talk about crazy conspiracy theories then there can none more nutty than the one that involves Luke Mitchell and his mum.
https://johnsmytheinvestigations.wordpress.com/2023/11/09/luke-mitchell-case-bust-jodi-case-lies-daily-record-article-08-november-2023/

[Nicholas]

John Smythe
If the unnamed relative wants to talk about crazy conspiracy theories then there can none more nutty than the one that involves Luke Mitchell and his mum.
https://johnsmytheinvestigations.wordpress.com/2023/11/09/luke-mitchell-case-bust-jodi-case-lies-daily-record-article-08-november-2023/

Does John Smythe even know the origin of this myth?

[Nicholas]

John Smythe:
“It is the unnamed relative again. Strange that the family, according to this person, are only demanding that the trial transcripts should be released now. They believe, according to this person, that certain facts are being withheld or misinterpreted. Which would be what exactly? I do agree with this unnamed relative in that the transcripts should be made available. Get everything out in the open. That should be welcomed by all irrespective of what their views may be on the case.

Maybe in the next article the relative can be referred to as John Smythe 🙄

John Smytheclearly has no real understanding of all the details of this case or of the difficulty faced reporting on the trial - which the killer, his mother and scammer Sandra Lean have taken advantage of for over two decades!

There are numerous facts being withheld John Smythe!

Including Shane Mitchell and Mr Beveridge - you clearly have no idea what you are writing about!

Btw John Smythe - Why didn’t you call out charlatan Sandra Lean’s bare faced lies about obtaining the trial transcripts and what’s “strange” about a relative asking that the trial transcripts be published in full?

It’s high time ALL of the facts of this case are made public - not the false narrative and snippets scammer Sandra Lean has drip fed the unsuspecting public!

[Nicholas]

Does John Smythe even know the origin of this myth?

Is this John Smythe also that PaulPeter? https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100084122046673 or is he linked to that fraudster Scott C Forbes?

[Nicholas]

John Smythe:
“That is because the generic statements put out by the Police and Crown do not answer any questions. Instead they just tell people that everything is fine. We've investigated this thoroughly and are satisfied we have our man. How dare you question us on this etc etc. That might satisfy a Daily Retard reader (is there actually any of them left these days?) but it does nothing to satisfy those with working brain cells who with even the most perfunctory of research should be able to see that this case absolutely stinks. It is also a bit insensitive to talk about frenzy when Jodi was the victim of a frenzied and brutal attack.

So John Smythe with your “working brain cells” what’s the story about Shane Mitchell and Mr Beveridge?

[Nicholas]

John Smythe:
“Untruths/lies are very easy to take apart. Once again, much like the previous article though the unnamed relative never bothers to list a single one of these untruths or lies.

Like scammer Sandra Lean’s numerous bare faced lies, including one of her recent ones, where she claimed to that fraudster Bob Ruff that the public cannot obtain the trial transcripts 🙄

The relative will no doubt know the facts of the case - that you and everyone else who has been duped by this scam aren’t yet aware of!

The daily record article was clear - releasing the trial transcripts will silence killer Luke Mitchell - and (my addition) it will also silence his toxic enablers!

[Nicholas]

John Smythe:
“Just bear in mind it will come low down in police priorities as they are too busy these days investigating women who put up stickers & ribbons or make possible hurty comments online.

Vandalism is a criminal offence and posting photos of yourself committing the offence isn’t wise !

[faithlilly]

Did killer Luke Mitchell’s step-mother and/or father Philip Mitchell produce a receipt for the Marilyn Manson calendar they bought him for his birthday (found torn up in a bin)

Scammer Sandra Lean;

“Aside from a torn up calendar, that was the only item Luke owned related to Manson” page 230

Sandra Lean had previously claimed the Marilyn Manson calendar had been bought for the killer by his step-mother

How was this established?

By a receipt?

“Detectives searched his home on July 4, four days after Jodi's body was found, and took a number of items away for examination. It later emerged that more than 20 bottles of a liquid thought to be urine, a Marilyn Manson CD and DVD and a calendar featuring the goth rocker were among the items seized.[/color]
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-334968/How-Jodis-killer-outwitted-police.html

Shane Mitchell told police his killer brother was obsessed with Marilyn Manson

They didn’t have to provide a receipt as they had the calendar. There was proof that it existed. There is not one scintilla of proof that a black handled skunting knife bought in December 2002 ever did.

[faithlilly]

John Smythe:
“Untruths/lies are very easy to take apart. Once again, much like the previous article though the unnamed relative never bothers to list a single one of these untruths or lies.

Like scammer Sandra Lean’s numerous bare faced lies, including one of her recent ones, where she claimed to that fraudster Bob Ruff that the public cannot obtain the trial transcripts 🙄

The relative will no doubt know the facts of the case - that you and everyone else who has been duped by this scam aren’t yet aware of!

The daily record article was clear - releasing the trial transcripts will silence killer Luke Mitchell - and (my addition) it will also silence his toxic enablers!

Why don’t you crowdfund to buy the transcripts?