"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Have you had any luck re NGU books and Viva Angelina publishing Scotland?

Neither are registered. Sound like fly-by-night con men.

Dummy publishing companies

[Nicholas]

Janine Jones Trial Testimony - 9th Dec 2004.(day 1 of 2)
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/12/blog-post.html

[Nicholas]

Janine Jones Trial Testimony - 9th Dec 2004.(day 1 of 2)
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/12/blog-post.html

This is chilling

[Nicholas]

Janine Jones Trial Testimony - 9th Dec 2004.(day 1 of 2)
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/12/blog-post.html

And that sick, sadistic psycho watched the families reactions from the other side of that wall 

 

[Nicholas]

Did Sandra Lean publish Luke Mitchell’s witness statements in full?

And if not why not?

And who fact checked her book?

FREE copy of scammer Sandra’s Lean’s fraudulent book
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/12/12/killer-luke-mitchell-betraying-the-innocent-by-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-grifter-sandra-lean-part-295/

‘Truth seeking is a precarious task and often maligned pursuit - to be labelled a crazy conspiracy theorist, interfering do-gooder, fame seeker, evil bitch, murderer lover, sicko - these are the reactions of many who are afraid of the truth’

~ Sandra Lean


“do-gooder” Sandra Lean - who claimed you were a “do-gooder”?

Or did you make that up as well

 
 

[Nicholas]

Janine Jones Trial Testimony - 9th Dec 2004.(day 1 of 2)
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/12/blog-post.html

Janine Jones Trial Testimony - 9th Dec 2004.(day 2 of 2)
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/12/janine-jones-transcript-101204-day-two.html

[Nicholas]

What did people make of Corinne Mitchell’s comments about her picturing seeing her sadistic, psychopathic murdering son being released from prison?

Corinne said she could picture him, his hair was long and he was wearing sunglasses

Why was her first thought about her killer sons image/appearance?

[Nicholas]

Janine Jones Trial Testimony - 9th Dec 2004.(day 2 of 2)
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/12/janine-jones-transcript-101204-day-two.html

There’s another page missing

Page 902

[Nicholas]

Why did scammer Sandra Lean omit the 10:51pm telephone call from Judith Jones landline to her mother Alice Walker’s landline, from her fraudulent book?

(FREE book http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/12/12/killer-luke-mitchell-betraying-the-innocent-by-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-grifter-sandra-lean-part-295/)

Page 139 “There is no phone data suggesting Judith had information that others made these calls in those seven minutes..” ~ scammer Sandra Lean

 

Alan Turnbull referred to the 10:51pm phone call during Janine Jones testimony

There’s nothing in her book on the 10:57pm or the 11:01pm telephone calls either - also referred to by Alan Turnbull during Janine Jones testimony

 

[Nicholas]

(FREE book http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/12/12/killer-luke-mitchell-betraying-the-innocent-by-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-grifter-sandra-lean-part-295/)

There’s nothing in her book on the 10:57pm or the 11:01pm telephone calls either - also referred to by Alan Turnbull during Janine Jones testimony

 

Scammer Sandra Lean - page 140

“…Luke does not remember talking to Judith once he was on the path…”

Of course he didn’t

 

22:43 (Approx): Judith Jones Telephoned Killer Luke Mitchell’s Mobile. It Was During This Call That The Killer Said He Would Go To Roans Dyke Path & Pretend To Look For Jodi Jones & If He Didn’t Find Jodi He Would Head To Judith Jones House
22:49: Judith Jones Telephoned Killer Luke Mitchell’s Mobile, Who Had Also Told Judith Jones He Had Been On The Path On His Bike
23:01: Judith Jones Telephoned Killer Luke Mitchell’s Mobile, While He Was On The Path - Source Janine Jones’ Trial Testimony
23:17: Judith Jones Telephoned Killer Luke Mitchell’s Mobile, While He Was On The Path - Source Janine Jones’ Trial Testimony

Killer Luke Mitchell ignored his mother Corinne Mitchell’s calls for 90 minutes

00:31 Killer Luke Mitchell Telephoned His Mother Corinne Mitchell To Tell Her “Stop f..king Phoning” (According To Fake “Lawyer” Scott Forbes
00:32-00:38 Killer Luke Mitchell Deleted His Telephone Call History

Corinne Mitchell stated;

 “He would not answer and then he finally phoned and said, 'I can't talk, I have to go.' He phoned back again and when I asked what happened he said, ‘I can't tell you’, I heard a man's voice in the background and Luke said it was a policeman and I asked to speak to him”
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/I+DIDN%27T+HELP+TO+COVER+UP+JODI+MURDER%3B+Denial+by+mother.-a0127122253

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell - 5th May 2010

“The parka was a theory conjured up by the police. According to them, Luke was "seen"......in three different jackets....One.....a parka.....two a german army shirt.....and three....a green bomber jacket......the latter is what Luke was wearing and the police took it when they stripped him  that night.
Mark Kane owned a Parka jacket and admitted to being in the area that night. He was the same height and build as Luke and also had the same hair colour and style.
The Police claimed I had burnt the Parka jacket in my log burner. then replaced it with another. The Parka Luke was photographed in, in the Press was bought after the murder.....and the police have that as well.
To think I had burnt the parka in my log burner is a complete joke. Its diameter is approx 14 inches and about 10inches high. Fine for burning small logs but thats it. Anything other than that would be impossible. Even cutting the parka into smaller sections its rediculous. Zips, buttons, studs etc would have been left and the police took the ash that was in it away......and surprise, surprise.......nothing was found.
When ,later, the police asked people if they had seen Luke in a Parka before the murder, a few said they had but by then he was in the press on a daily basis...wearing the parka.......all in a bid to set out to confuse people. I know for a fact that some of his school mates were manipulated by the police. When they said that Luke only started wearing the Parka after the murder the police were determined to get them to change their minds.

 

[Nicholas]

Killer Luke Mitchell: Remorseless Murderer Sean Patrick Toal Aka Social Sessions & Scammer Sandra Lean’s Silence On The Trial Transcripts (Part 301)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/12/13/killer-luke-mitchell-remorseless-murderer-sean-patrick-toal-aka-social-sessions-scammer-sandra-leans-silence-on-the-trial-transcripts-exposing-her-bare-faced-lies-part-301/

[Nicholas]

Killer Luke Mitchell: Remorseless Murderer Sean Patrick Toal Aka Social Sessions & Scammer Sandra Lean’s Silence On The Trial Transcripts (Part 301)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/12/13/killer-luke-mitchell-remorseless-murderer-sean-patrick-toal-aka-social-sessions-scammer-sandra-leans-silence-on-the-trial-transcripts-exposing-her-bare-faced-lies-part-301/

👆🏽UPDATED

[Nicholas]

Excerpts from P.270-271 of scammer Sandra Lean’s bogus thesis “Hidden in Plain View”

Internet campaigns
‘The steady increase in internet campaigns, although creating an outlet for information which is largely ignored or dismissed by the mainstream print and broadcast media, is orchestrated by individuals who have little or no experience of creating and guiding a large media presence, or how to maintain and increase interest once a case has begun to draw attention. An apparently successful campaign for one high profile case in 2009/2010, which drew several hundred supporters, collapsed amidst a very public, bitter and acrimonious dispute between various contributors.89 There were several consequences, including some contributors and supporters withdrawing from internet advocacy, others withdrawing from some campaigns whilst supporting others, and the creation of a general rift in what had, prior to that, been an encouraging and cohesive group. Anonymous and malicious posting, and posters using multiple online identities, have been an ongoing difficulty for online campaigns (and campaigners), with smear tactics and dishonesty being used to discredit individuals and cases, sometimes spilling over into physical threats and arrests90.
Restrictions in Scotland introduce an added difficulty for individuals wishing to run internet campaigns, as it is an offence to make public many documents used in trials or court proceedings,91 something which is a central part of internet campaigns both in England and in the USA. The ability to make available publicly actual copies of documents used in investigative and trial proceedings is considered to be a strong factor in convincing members of the public that a conviction is wrongful, but in Scotland, the inability to do so leaves open accusations that supporters of wrongly accused/convicted persons cannot “prove‟ that their claims have any basis in truth or fact, and those supporters and campaigners have no way of effectively responding to such accusations.

89 This campaign was beset with difficulties introduced by control issues, contributors who were ignorant of the actual legal processes involved, defensiveness, a tendency for contributors to interpret criticisms and suggestions as personal attacks, and the recurring difficulties of malicious and disingenuous contributors posting under numerous false identities.

90 In the course of this study, four people were arrested for online harassment and intimidation, direct physical threats were made to at least three individuals, including death threats, photographs of individuals‟ homes and family members were posted online, and personal addresses and phone numbers were released. Police in England acted on complaints of online harassment and intimidation, whereas Scottish police refused repeatedly to do so.

91 In Scotland, where case papers are deemed to belong to the solicitor, the solicitor is prohibited from disclosing information to “third parties‟ – for example, statements and expert reports in cases in England and Wales have been incorporated into campaign websites, but this would be an offence in Scotland.

 

Killer Luke Mitchell: FREE Book- Betraying The Innocent Using Psychological Manipulation, Intentional Bare Faced Lies, Disinformation & Misinformation By Innocence Fraud Phenomenon Grifter Sandra Lean (Part 295)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/12/13/killer-luke-mitchell-free-book-betraying-the-innocent-using-psychological-manipulation-intentional-bare-faced-lies-disinformation-misinformation-by-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-grifter-sandra/

[Nicholas]

Killer Luke Mitchell: Creepy Innocence Fraud Phenomenon  Grifter & Arrogant Convicted Drug Dealer Shaun Attwood On Scammer Sandra Lean & Her Book (Part 302)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/12/14/killer-luke-mitchell-creepy-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-grifter-arrogant-convicted-drug-dealer-shaun-attwood-on-scammer-sandra-lean-her-book-part-302/