ECHR urge McCanns to reach friendly settlement with Gonçalo Amaral.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Only in the opinion of those who think that repeating what was in the released files was unlawful.

Look.  Were the allegations made against the McCanns  in a book and on TV  proven or not? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Only in the opinion of those who think that repeating what was in the released files was unlawful.

Furthermore, if the McCanns had face trial in Portugal following the publication of Amaral’s book and media campaign do you think they would have received a fair trial?

[G-Unit]

Forum s can dismiss who they want but banning posters because they think the mccanns are innocent really does make the forum pathetic.

A different reason was quoted; "75 posts on various threads of your nonsense and drivel is more than enough."

[Vertigo Swirl]

A different reason was quoted; "75 posts on various threads of your nonsense and drivel is more than enough."

lol  Is this what constitutes nonsense and drivel on that forum?

“I’ve researched the facts behind the case and from what I can see the Mccanns have a very strong case. It Is basically a balance between item 10 and 8. That’s the right to free speech against the right to reputation. Posters might not like it but looking at previous cases the Mccanns will be successful. We then have the right to the presumption of innocence which the SC stated does not apply in a civil court. From past rulings by the ECHR it does. L”

[Vertigo Swirl]

Is it Bennett’s forum?  I presume so.  It’s the most sinister, gestapo-like forum I’ve ever been a (short-lived) member of. 

[Brietta]

A different reason was quoted; "75 posts on various threads of your nonsense and drivel is more than enough."

Away with you ~ it is as plain as the nose on a face that the seven posts quoted - not one of which contained a single offensive word or a single inaccuracy - were the tipping point for this poster to be banished for posting "nonsense" and "drivel".

The poster had an opinion on the McCann case at the ECHR which just was not going to be allowed.  A perfect example of the hypocrisy displayed by a forum which claims itself to be the champion of free speech 😁

[G-Unit]

Look.  Were the allegations made against the McCanns  in a book and on TV  proven or not?

Does an opinion need to be proven?

[G-Unit]

Away with you ~ it is as plain as the nose on a face that the seven posts quoted - not one of which contained a single offensive word or a single inaccuracy - were the tipping point for this poster to be banished for posting "nonsense" and "drivel".

The poster had an opinion on the McCann case at the ECHR which just was not going to be allowed.  A perfect example of the hypocrisy displayed by a forum which claims itself to be the champion of free speech 😁

On some forums opinions are expected to be justified by an explanation.

[Eleanor]

Is it Bennett’s forum?  I presume so.  It’s the most sinister, gestapo-like forum I’ve ever been a (short-lived) member of.

Me to also.  Although I never actually said anything.  I was just known to be a McCann Supporter.  And so I had to go.

Personally, I wouldn't label them Gestapo.  They really aren't clever enough although they might be vicious enough if only they knew how.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Does an opinion need to be proven?

Sorry, did you write this?

“If you can't prove it in court you can't publicly announce that someone is guilty without risking being sued”.
and this?

“You must surely realise that you can't publicly name this person and state that they are a thief?”

[Vertigo Swirl]

On some forums opinions are expected to be justified by an explanation.

You are defending the indefensible and you know it.  Just be honest for once, can you please?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Me to also.  Although I never actually said anything.  I was just known to be a McCann Supporter.  And so I had to go.

Personally, I wouldn't label them Gestapo.  They really aren't clever enough although they might be vicious enough if only they knew how.

By Gestapo-like I meant fascist, metaphorical jackboots stamping down on anyone out of line, endless hate-filled propaganda, issuing threats and toying with members before giving them the drop, a cult-like rulership  Yuck.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Furthermore, if the McCanns had face trial in Portugal following the publication of Amaral’s book and media campaign do you think they would have received a fair trial?

G-Unit, you missed this question.

[Mr Gray]

A different reason was quoted; "75 posts on various threads of your nonsense and drivel is more than enough."

it seems if you think the McCanns are innocent...thats considered drivel

if you think covid is not  a plandemic by world leaders...thats drivel

Of course you can put your head in the sand and beleive CMOMM accepts all opinions b ut everyone knows that is not true.

There is plenty of drivel on the site....the dogs that have never been wrong in 200 outings just one current example...but its all being posted by raving loonies

[Mr Gray]

On some forums opinions are expected to be justified by an explanation.

on the site that you support it says..

Two top UK Dogs who alerted to blood and cadaver odour in McCanns’ apartment and hire car had never been wrong in 200 previous outings.

i presume you understand that isnt true...and its stated as a fact..lol