ECHR urge McCanns to reach friendly settlement with Gonçalo Amaral.

[Brietta]

Can you point out where in my post I mentioned hatred B.

Can you point out where in my post I mentioned you did K.

[kizzy]

Can you point out where in my post I mentioned you did K.

Well, the clue is it was in reply to my post you mentioned hatred.

quote

attitude which reduces her to less than a footnote in their diatribe of hatred for her parents.

[G-Unit]

What difference will it make?

The difference between the Fund hanging on to it's £750,000 or losing it all to Amaral.

[Eleanor]

The difference between the Fund hanging on to it's £750,000 or losing it all to Amaral.

This will make absolutely no difference to me.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The difference between the Fund hanging on to it's £750,000 or losing it all to Amaral.

The ECHR ruling will either find in favour of the McCanns and they will receive compensation or it won’t and they won’t.  If there is an unsettled issue of what’s due to Amaral then presumably that would be a separate matter.  IMO.

[jassi]

This will make absolutely no difference to me.

Nor me, but I'm sure that even the thought of it will upset some.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Nor me, but I'm sure that even the thought of it will upset some.

Yeah, it will definitely ruin my life if Amaral gets his hands on the Fund dosh.

[Eleanor]

Yeah, it will definitely ruin my life if Amaral gets his hands on the Fund dosh.

I wish you hadn't put it quite like that.  I might have to take to making wax models.

Now there's a thought.

[Wonderfulspam]

What do the McCanns need a fund for anyway?

Aren't the Portuguese, British & German tax payers already funding the 'search'.

[jassi]

What do the McCanns need a fund for anyway?

Aren't the Portuguese, British & German tax payers already funding the 'search'.

I believe one of the uncles said it was for a fighting fund - which I always thought was a strange turn of phrase.

I wonder who was perceived as the enemy so early in the game?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/may/16/ukcrime3

[Vertigo Swirl]

I believe one of the uncles said it was for a fighting fund - which I always thought was a strange turn of phrase.

I wonder who was perceived as the enemy so early in the game?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/may/16/ukcrime3

Have you never heard the expression “Fighting Fund” before?  The “enemy” was the absence of Madeleine, at the hands of a stranger abductor, certainly as far as the person who referred to it as such was concerned I’m sure.

[barrier]

What do the McCanns need a fund for anyway?

Aren't the Portuguese, British & German tax payers already funding the 'search'.

Its for when the cops end it and pack their bags with no resolution.

[Wonderfulspam]

Its for when the cops end it and pack their bags with no resolution.

As if there'd be anything left to investigate. The case is solved, so we're told.

Why would the McCanns doubt Brueckners guilt, given the overwhelming & irrefutable evidence he killed Maddie?

[Angelo222]

What do the McCanns need a fund for anyway?

Aren't the Portuguese, British & German tax payers already funding the 'search'.

According to the parents the Fund is there to provide financial help in any future search for Maddie for when the various police forces eventually give up.  It was also stated that the money (if any left) would go to help in the search for other missing chdren once Maddie's fate was determined.

[Wonderfulspam]

According to the parents the Fund is there to provide financial help in any future search for Maddie for when the various police forces eventually give up.  It was also stated that the money (if any left) would go to help in the search for other missing children once Maddie's fate was determined.

I really hope they fund the search for Joana.