The clothing aspect is so frustrating - it's impossible to know whether the moving of any the clothes by the scenes of crime officers took place before they were photographed, there's no way of telling whether AW, in going right up to the body, may have accidentally have kicked things into a new position etc.
"There's no way of knowing" - That predictive very telling response given when faced with those clear facts. That the scene was photographed prior to any movement. Which of course it was. And that there is every reason to know that the scene of crime officers moved nothing prior to this point. And of AW - And of course this tells us clearly, that the information that is being pushed out, about the handling of the crime scene - is one of assumption and desperation, to disperse any scrapings of doubt, upon the police.. - one either does not have the reports around this, or one is choosing to ignore them? But it is clear that she can give nothing - to show with clarity that the scene was anything other than handled with care. - And we know that CD was firm in the evidence he gave, of the critique on the non erection of a tent. - Of his statement of it being one of the finest crime scenes.
So we are left with one area only - that of the non erection of a tent. We know that it was not feasible to put a tent around everything - which we can then make a fair assumption, that advice was given, to gather the items, to put in a closer proximity to then have the tent erected. - clearly done with the opposite of what we are being led to believe, that it was done for the very reason of preservation - Of any possible contamination upon them. And, as has already been highlighted, that this also applies to the coroner or anyone else - traipsing through any other areas of this crime scene - for the woodland was a crime scene not just were Jodi lay, or her clothing. - It was, in effect the whole area, that strip of woodland in its entirety - for at this point, there was no way of knowing where this assault started and finished. - It was extremely important to preserve all, by cordoning the area off and by having no one enter other areas - until the forensic teams could do their job.
And from the forensic teams and of this bleaching the scene - but only in the East end of this woodland strip, prior to the dogs being brought in. Why does one suppose this happened? The forensics, with their equipment already picking up blood trails - none of which were in the East end of this woodland strip. Enough for them to know, even with the rainfall that evening - that may have washed some trails from more exposed areas - there was nothing found in the East end of this woodland nor heading in the direction of Newbattle Abbey college - this is the information you are not being given - instead you are being led to believe, that they were only interested in the dogs scenting one way. Again to tie in with some ludicrous assumptions of fitting up LM. - they were simply going by the evidence before them. That this assault had began in one area and ended close to where Jodi lay. And from there those trails led one way also.
And it only becomes "botched up" - when we have someone coming along, and adding some very strange lines of obtuse reasoning - to yet again shore over those gaping holes in their own account. - Which shows us, yet again, does it not - That Ms Lean is far from being a credible source on much of anything, does it not? That these incredulous notions are set to muddy the waters, to distract yet again, away from the clear evidence against LM, to disperse doubt upon others. From the police here and onto of course these others, for it is the manipulation of this that then brings about comments, such as "They only bleached the Easthouses side so the dogs would go to Newbattle" - The implication being, that these others, these suspects stayed in these other directions - when it is the clear facts, that there was nothing, no blood trails found by the forensic teams - of anyone escaping in another direction - And of course Ms Lean would not want people to think this way - for these others are important to her - to sway everything away from LM. - The peoples lives that she uses as pawns, does she not? - for she knows without a shadow of a doubt, there is not the slightest bit of evidence - that shows they had anything in the slightest, to do with the death of Jodi Jones.
