Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[G-Unit]

Did you watch the channel 9 doc. She raised the possibility after interviewing wolters.  Her thought process exactly the same as mine

She said that Madeleine was abducted between 9 and 10pm and that during that same time a mobile phone linked CB was used in the immediate area of her hotel room. (23:10)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXsXXxRek2Q

That isn't correct.

She wondered if there was video evidence showing Madeleine among the items found at the factory site. (23:15). Wolters' reply was that he wasn't allowed to say. It was only later that he admitted to Jon Clarke that he hadn't seen the evidence that was found. On page 278 of his book he says that Wolters has firmly denied that he has them.

I'm not either convinced or impressed by the presenter of the Channel 9 doc.

[Wonderfulspam]

To bring things slightly back on topic, do you consider Mark Williams Thomas to be a morally devoid, Flat Earther with a burning desire to stick the boot into Amaral?

“Former Surrey detective Mark Williams-Thomas said: "This controversial case (Joana Cipriano) must be re-opened - there are huge doubts over the convictions.

"The fact that there's another missing-child case so close to where Maddie disappeared just three years ago, that should be ringing alarm bells. There's not a single case in the UK where two children who are unknown to each other have been abducted or disappeared within a period of four years in a seven-mile radius.

"There must be a link. It certainly has to be a serious line of inquiry."

The guy has proven he'll claim to believe anything, say anything, if there's something for him to gain from it.

His track record shows this. He's flip flopped on the Maddie case when it suits him, & believes Oscar Pistorious is innocent. I wonder how much Oscar paid him to voice that opinion?

[barrier]

I think you'd agree that's rather a lot of fairly damning circumstantial evidence. notwithstanding confessions to at least 2 other people. Still, why would CB buckle? He has a top-notch lawyer batting for his side with seemingly unlimited financial backing & all those other "minor" crimes like accidental homicide being divulged by his associates may require further representation.

From your point of view or the BKA ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

You were cracking up laughing at my repartee earlier. Now this.

And sensible answer came there none, as expected.

[Mr Gray]

She said that Madeleine was abducted between 9 and 10pm and that during that same time a mobile phone linked CB was used in the immediate area of her hotel room. (23:10)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXsXXxRek2Q

That isn't correct.

She wondered if there was video evidence showing Madeleine among the items found at the factory site. (23:15). Wolters' reply was that he wasn't allowed to say. It was only later that he admitted to Jon Clarke that he hadn't seen the evidence that was found. On page 278 of his book he says that Wolters has firmly denied that he has them.

I'm not either convinced or impressed by the presenter of the Channel 9 doc.

Wolters answered all questions honestly.. Any DNA in the cars.. No.. Anyb forensic evidence... No.. Any images... I'm not allowed to say.

The presenter made a point about that they may just have been given a clue.
I haven't seen Clarke's book.. Would need to see it before commenting

[barrier]

The guy has proven he'll claim to believe anything, say anything, if there's something for him to gain from it.

His track record shows this. He's flip flopped on the Maddie case when it suits him, & believes Oscar Pistorious is innocent. I wonder how much Oscar paid him to voice that opinion?

Still he's got 27 pages and counting on here ,rolling along.

[barrier]

I see Wolters is denying the alibi claim, like you would through the medium of the press.

[barrier]

She said that Madeleine was abducted between 9 and 10pm and that during that same time a mobile phone linked CB was used in the immediate area of her hotel room. (23:10)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXsXXxRek2Q

That isn't correct.

She wondered if there was video evidence showing Madeleine among the items found at the factory site. (23:15). Wolters' reply was that he wasn't allowed to say. It was only later that he admitted to Jon Clarke that he hadn't seen the evidence that was found. On page 278 of his book he says that Wolters has firmly denied that he has them.

I'm not either convinced or impressed by the presenter of the Channel 9 doc.

So when he says he can't say its because he doesn't know.

[Wonderfulspam]

Your post makes little sense.  Why is MWT let off the hook but people on this forum are not allowed to share his opinion without being accused of all sorts of ridiculous nonsense? Your faith in the Portuguese justice system is quite touching but I just wonder why you simply refuse to even countenance even the possibility that in the absence of any hard evidence at all that Joana was not actually murdered, cut up and fed to the pigs by her Uncle?  I am not committed one way or the other wrt to the Ciprianos' guilt or innocence by the way I just think it's worth another look.  If that makes me guilty of being all the nasty things you've levelled at me (indirectly) today then so be it.  I can just take the abuse (despite my fragile mental health as diagnosed by your good self Dr. General).   

Because it's obvious she wasn't abducted, for the reasons I've mentioned again & again & again.

It simply isn't reasonable, by any stretch of the imagination, to believe an innocent mother wouldn't be concerned enough to report her 8 year old daughter missing when she hasn't come home from a 10 min trip to the shops.

Therefore it's obvious something else happened, & it wasn't innocent.

But you already know that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I see Wolters is denying the alibi claim, like you would through the medium of the press.

What medium would suit you better?  Carrier pigeon?

[The General]

So when he says he can't say its because he doesn't know.

It could be he's just the mouthpiece and may have limited access to what the grown ups are doing.

[barrier]

What medium would suit you better?  Carrier pigeon?

You believe the nonsense ?

[jassi]

I see Wolters is denying the alibi claim, like you would through the medium of the press.

 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/prosecutors-reject-claims-madeleine-mccann-25905370

 Prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters said: “If I had an alibi and was accused of this, I would say it. But I have heard no such claims from Brueckner or his lawyer.”

Has he forgotten that ,as yet, he hasn't charged Brueckner with anything  or even  questioned him ?

Why do people expect Brueckner to say anything ahead of being charged ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

You believe the nonsense ?

What's that got to do with what I wrote or commented on?

[Vertigo Swirl]

 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/prosecutors-reject-claims-madeleine-mccann-25905370

 Prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters said: “If I had an alibi and was accused of this, I would say it. But I have heard no such claims from Brueckner or his lawyer.”

Has he forgotten that ,as yet, he hasn't charged Brueckner with anything  or even  questioned him ?

Why do people expect Brueckner to say anything ahead of being charged ?

Maybe because CB has been quite whingeingly vocal about all the injustice heaped upon his shoulders?