Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[Wonderfulspam]

... then close the patio door behind her, then open and close the childproof gate at the top of the stairs, and finally open and close the garden gate.

They clearly exclude the possibility she could have opened the front door.

Must have been locked then.

[faithlilly]

I'm guessing that must be Tia Sharpe?

That's the only attic body I know, off the top of my head.
 (apart from all the bodies in my attic obviously).

Didn't realise MWT interviewed him.

https://youtu.be/8E_dTHeeszA

[Wonderfulspam]

https://youtu.be/8E_dTHeeszA

Thanks.

I just watched a clip of Stuart Hazel's interview, but the camera never showed the interviewer during.

[Vertigo Swirl]

https://youtu.be/8E_dTHeeszA

Was he a cop with a search warrant when he conducted that interview?  Did he give any indication that he believed that s..mbag was telling the truth at any point?

[faithlilly]

Was he a cop with a search warrant when he conducted that interview?  Did he give any indication that he believed that s..mbag was telling the truth at any point?

You’re right….so he can still be the greatest investigator ever, can’t he?

Can’t wait for his debunking of the BKA’s case against Brueckner now. Thanks VS.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You’re right….so he can still be the greatest investigator ever, can’t he?

Can’t wait for his debunking of the BKA’s case against Brueckner now. Thanks VS.

Strange logic.  I’m not sure anyone thinks he is the greatest investigator ever but it does now seem you have some respect for his opinion (an opinion which includes the view that the parents have been completely exonerated by the way).I wouldn’t get too excited about his forthcoming documentary however, I think he already shot his load on the This Morning couch so to speak, so few if any earth shattering revelations to look forward to now.

[faithlilly]

Strange logic.  I’m not sure anyone thinks he is the greatest investigator ever but it does now seem you have some respect for his opinion (an opinion which includes the view that the parents have been completely exonerated by the way).I wouldn’t get too excited about his forthcoming documentary however, I think he already shot his load on the This Morning couch so to speak, so few if any earth shattering revelations to look forward to now.

I’m not guided by opinion but evidence and as I don’t watch This Morning I’ll just have to wait for the real deal to see how much respect he’s due.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I’m not guided by opinion but evidence and as I don’t watch This Morning I’ll just have to wait for the real deal to see how much respect he’s due.

LOL, ok.  I don’t watch This Morning either but someone kindly posted a clip of his interview on here plus it’s been widely reported and discussed on this forum, how his claims of explosive revelations in his documentary turned out to be something of a damp squib: an alibi that isn’t really an alibi and a claim that the phone used by Brückner was actually not his, both claims which HCW seemed quite at ease with when challenged about them  by SF and which he appeared to dismiss as either untrue or irrelevant.  Still I’m sure we will all be glued to the set when MWT’s programme is on, that after all is exactly what this is all about - getting bums on seats and audience figures for Channel 5..

[faithlilly]

LOL, ok.  I don’t watch This Morning either but someone kindly posted a clip of his interview on here plus it’s been widely reported and discussed on this forum, how his claims of explosive revelations in his documentary turned out to be something of a damp squib: an alibi that isn’t really an alibi and a claim that the phone used by Brückner was actually not his, both claims which HCW seemed quite at ease with when challenged about them  by SF and which he appeared to dismiss as either untrue or irrelevant.  Still I’m sure we will all be glued to the set when MWT’s programme is on, that after all is exactly what this is all about - getting bums on seats and audience figures for Channel 5..

I’m more interested in SF’s claims that fibres connected to Madeleine have been found in Brueckner’s campervan…a claim that the news media, expect perhaps the real rags, have ignored. One of the biggest stories connected to this case for 15 years but no credible news service is reporting it. Why is that do you think? Has Miss F been sold a pup?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I’m more interested in SF’s claims that fibres connected to Madeleine have been found in Brueckner’s campervan…a claim that the news media, expect perhaps the real rags, have ignored. One of the biggest stories connected to this case for 15 years but no credible news service is reporting it. Why is that do you think? Has Miss F been sold a pup?

You’re obviously not keeping up.  They are all reporting it now, I even posted a link to the Guardian article about it earlier just for you!  It’s also in the Telegraph and thr Times, so you may have to revise your pist.  Also, I don’t believe SF mentioned fibres specifically - have you a cite?

[faithlilly]

You’re obviously not keeping up.  They are all reporting it now, I even posted a link to the Guardian article about it earlier just for you!  It’s also in the Telegraph and thr Times, so you may have to revise your pist.  Also, I don’t believe SF mentioned fibres specifically - have you a cite?

I don’t tend to read newspapers…the front covers on Sky is usually enough for me. Are the reports saying ‘ the Sun has reported’ ? And of course you are right SF didn’t mention fibres, I appear to have got that from elsewhere, but to ‘something of Madeleine McCann’ so you can have that one for free.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don’t tend to read newspapers…the front covers on Sky is usually enough for me. Are the reports saying ‘ the Sun has reported’ ? And of course you are right SF didn’t mention fibres, I appear to have got that from elsewhere, but to ‘something of Madeleine McCann’ so you can have that one for free.

If you don’t read newspapers then you’re hardly best placed to ask why no credible news service is reporting the latest developments. 

[faithlilly]

If you don’t read newspapers then you’re hardly best placed to ask why no credible news service is reporting the latest developments.

Then let me make it clearer. On none of the front covers of any of the credible print media is there any mention of a breakthrough in one of the biggest missing child cases in the world. If it was true, it would be.

Hope that clarifies things.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Then let me make it clearer. On none of the front covers of any of the credible print media is there any mention of a breakthrough in one of the biggest missing child cases in the world. If it was true, it would be.

Hope that clarifies things.

It was on the Times online front page yesterday with a big picture of Madeleine so I’m not sure what point you are making?  Is it that they only put true thing on their covers and everything after that is probably just lies?

[faithlilly]

It was on the Times online front page yesterday with a big picture of Madeleine so I’m not sure what point you are making?  Is it that they only put true thing on their covers and everything after that is probably just lies?

It certainly wasn’t on the print version front page.

Anyhoo the point I’m dying to make is that if the ‘something from Madeleine McCann’ is true the news would be on every news channel, on the front pages of every newspaper…just like the ‘100% DNA match to Maddie’ was….but it’s not.

What appears to have happened is Miss F has been told by ‘a police source’, about the item, much as she was in 2007 and has run with it. Geez even Martin Brunt doesn’t seem interested and he’ll willingly fly of to Portugal for any old McCann related rubbish.