Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[jassi]

Mark Williams Thomas is such a fibber.  He did not expose Jimmy Savile.  And now he appears to have dropped Brueckner's Alibi without a word of explanation.

Next we have some untouchable person who won't ever be exposed until he is dead.  Dead is always a good one, of course.  Mark Williams Thomas is a charlatan who has never proved anything.

Exactly, though it may be some worthless celebrity. They seem fair game.

[Brietta]

Mark Williams Thomas is such a fibber.  He did not expose Jimmy Savile.  And now he appears to have dropped Brueckner's Alibi without a word of explanation.

Next we have some untouchable person who won't ever be exposed until he is dead.  Dead is always a good one, of course.  Mark Williams Thomas is a charlatan who has never proved anything.

There is nothing to protect your reputation when you are dead and there are no safeguards to ensure that the charitable work you carried out in life will be disbursed with the legacy as willed by you among the charities supported by you in life after your death.
Sir Jimmy Savile leaves £5m to charity in his will
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/sir-jimmy-savile-leaves-5m-97007

There was never a trial - but it made no difference - Savile's reputation has been trashed forever and he was never given the opportunity to contest every opportunist jumping on the bandwagon.

One being Carl Beech Carl Beech trial: 'VIP abuse' accuser guilty of false claims https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49074879
Who only had to fill in a form to get his cut (£40,000 I think?) from the Savile Estate.

[faithlilly]

Brietta wrote

“ There is nothing to protect your reputation when you are dead and there are no safeguards to ensure that the charitable work you carried out in life will be disbursed with the legacy as willed by you among the charities supported by you in life after your death.
Sir Jimmy Savile leaves £5m to charity in his will
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/sir-jimmy-savile-leaves-5m-97007

There was never a trial - but it made no difference - Savile's reputation has been trashed forever and he was never given the opportunity to contest every opportunist jumping on the bandwagon.”

Am I to conclude from your post above that you believe that Saville was slurred, unjustifiably, after his death? And if that is the case don’t you think it’s rather sick to believe that victims of Saville’s abuse were ‘opportunists jumping on the bandwagon’?

[Myster]

Dame Janet Smith's report on James Savile's activities makes sobering reading...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8FHb08pc44

[faithlilly]

Dame Janet Smith's report on James Savile's activities makes sobering reading...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8FHb08pc44

Yet still some still believe that HE was the victim.

Shocking.

[G-Unit]

Dame Janet Smith's report on James Savile's activities makes sobering reading...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8FHb08pc44

Well she was utterly convinced and convincing.

[Brietta]

Well she was utterly convinced and convincing.

According to your posts you appear to find Amaral convinced and convincing.

As far as the "me too" version of justice is concerned my preference is for conclusions to be based on

• evidence and the rule of law
• evidence introduced by the prosecution in an open court
• evidence challenged by the defence in an open court
• evidence perused by a judge and a jury in an open court
• and all of that process to be conducted while the defendant is still alive

[G-Unit]

According to your posts you appear to find Amaral convinced and convincing.

As far as the "me too" version of justice is concerned my preference is for conclusions to be based on

• evidence and the rule of law
• evidence introduced by the prosecution in an open court
• evidence challenged by the defence in an open court
• evidence perused by a judge and a jury in an open court
• and all of that process to be conducted while the defendant is still alive

Did you read Dame Janet Smith's evidence?

[faithlilly]

Did you read Dame Janet Smith's evidence?

It absolutely sickens me that some are still in denial over Saville’s crimes.

[Eleanor]

It absolutely sickens me that some are still in denial over Saville’s crimes.

Put on trial and been convicted, was he?

[faithlilly]

Put on trial and been convicted, was he?

Do you think that he didn’t do any of the horrendous things that he is accused of?

[Eleanor]

Do you think that he didn’t do any of the horrendous things that he is accused of?

I don't know and nor do you.

[faithlilly]

I don't know and nor do you.

Sometimes the weight of evidence tells it’s own story.

I met Saville once…he offered me his hand but I declined to shake it.

Odd individual.

[Eleanor]

Sometimes the weight of evidence tells it’s own story.

I met Saville once…he offered me his hand but I declined to shake it.

Odd individual.

Carl Beech seems to have done alright out of it.  How many more like him were there?

[faithlilly]

Carl Beech seems to have done alright out of it.  How many more like him were there?

He was handed an 18 year jail sentence…is that your idea of ‘alright’?