If The Germans Have It Almost In The Bag...

[Wonderfulspam]

”I really fancy a Big Mac.  I’m going to have it with a side portion of fries.  I will eat it very slowly and I might even take a selfie of myself eating it”.  This clearly indicates I have never eaten a Big Mac before. 
Good logic.

Big Macs are significantly more common than abduction rape & murder, & I haven't seen any evidence Brueckner has been to McDonalds either.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Bruckner’s exact words

“Friend: Hello
Bruckner: How are things going?
Friend: Very well. How about you?
Bruckner: Not so well. I want to f... a little one
Friend: Who doesn't want to...
Bruckner: Do you have any new films?
Friend: Unfortunately not. I barely had time during the week.
Bruckner: OK. Anyway sending films this way is dangerous.
(...)
Bruckner: Catching something small and to be able to use it for days...
Friend: It is also not without danger....
Bruckner: If the evidence is deleted afterwards...
(...)
Brueckner :Then [before they meet] I will record a lot of films. (...) I will document exactly how she will be tortured.”
                     

Which bit demonstrates he has never abducted, raped and murdered a child before?

[Wonderfulspam]

Bruckner’s exact words

“Friend: Hello
Bruckner: How are things going?
Friend: Very well. How about you?
Bruckner: Not so well. I want to f... a little one
Friend: Who doesn't want to...
Bruckner: Do you have any new films?
Friend: Unfortunately not. I barely had time during the week.
Bruckner: OK. Anyway sending films this way is dangerous.
(...)
Bruckner: Catching something small and to be able to use it for days...
Friend: It is also not without danger....
Bruckner: If the evidence is deleted afterwards...
(...)
Brueckner :Then [before they meet] I will record a lot of films. (...) I will document exactly how she will be tortured.”
                     

Which bit demonstrates he has never abducted, raped and murdered a child before?

The bit where he doesn't mention ever having abducted raped or murdered a child before.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Big Macs are significantly more common than abduction rape & murder, & I haven't seen any evidence Brueckner has been to McDonalds either.

What has “significantly more common” got to do with it?  It’s the language you were referring to, the use of future tense which you seem to think proves that discussing something you wish to do proves you have never done it before.  Bizarre logic.

[Wonderfulspam]

What has “significantly more common” got to do with it?  It’s the language you were referring to, the use of future tense which you seem to think proves that discussing something you wish to do proves you have never done it before.  Bizarre logic.

It's the absence of the word 'again' that suggests he hasn't.

If he said 'I want to rape a little one 'again', that would suggest the opposite wouldn't it, but he never said that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's the absence of the word 'again' that suggests he hasn't.

If he said 'I want to rape a little one 'again', that would suggest the opposite wouldn't it, but he never said that.

Oh well that’s it then.  He never said “again” which clearly proves his innocence. Jesus H.  Your logic is 

[Wonderfulspam]

Oh well that’s it then.  He never said “again” which clearly proves his innocence. Jesus H.  Your logic is 

He doesn't need to prove his innocence.

You need to prove he's abducted raped & murdered anyone or stop libelling him.

[Vertigo Swirl]

He doesn't need to prove his innocence.

You need to prove he's abducted raped & murdered anyone or stop libelling him.

Hello.  You are hell bent on trying to prove his innocence by citing his phone conversation as evidence that he has never raped or murdered a child ago.  The logic is flawed. I have not libelled him. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Hello.  You are hell bent on trying to prove his innocence by citing his phone conversation as evidence that he has never raped or murdered a child ago.  The logic is flawed. I have not libelled him.

No, I don't need to prove his innocence because he hasn't been found guilty.

This isn't Big Macs, these are serious allegations.

You're suggesting he may have raped & murdered a child & you have no evidence that he has, but when I suggest Kate & Gerry might have done the same based on an equal amount of evidence I get 50%. There's something about that seems like an injustice to me.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

The circumstantial evidence in the public domain is certainly weak, in my opinion: CB was somewhere near PDL on the night in question, he used his phone that night, and he has depraved texts in internet chat rooms... However when it comes to concrete evidence this is from Uncle's post earlier: "Wolter clarified that they have not recovered McCann’s body, cannot prove that she has died, and have no forensic evidence that connects Brueckner to her suspected murder. But the investigators have very strong circumstantial evidence:"

[Vertigo Swirl]

No, I don't need to prove his innocence because he hasn't been found guilty.

This isn't Big Macs, these are serious allegations.

You're suggesting he may have raped & murdered a child & you have no evidence that he has, but when I suggest Kate & Gerry might have done the same based on an equal amount of evidence I get 50%. There's something about that seems like an injustice to me.

I’m not responsible for giving you 50% so don’t complain to me.  Do you have some transcripts of Gerry talking about what depraved things he wants to do to a child btw?

[Vertigo Swirl]

No, I don't need to prove his innocence because he hasn't been found guilty.

This isn't Big Macs, these are serious allegations.

You're suggesting he may have raped & murdered a child & you have no evidence that he has, but when I suggest Kate & Gerry might have done the same based on an equal amount of evidence I get 50%. There's something about that seems like an injustice to me.

As far as I’m concerned Bruckner demonstrates a callous disregard for the well being of little children and sees them as objects to be consumed to satiate a hunger and discarded when finished with, much like fast food in fact.

[Wonderfulspam]

I’m not responsible for giving you 50% so don’t complain to me.  Do you have some transcripts of Gerry talking about what depraved things he wants to do to a child btw?

No, but the absence of the transcripts could suggest he destroyed them.

Yes, that sounds like logic that might be applied to Brueckner so I'm going with that.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

As far as I’m concerned Bruckner demonstrates a callous disregard for the well being of little children and sees them as objects to be consumed to satiate a hunger and discarded when finished with, much like fast food in fact.

The paedophile who sexually abused my daughter has "a callous disregard for the well being of little children and sees them as objects" but he didn't kill Madeleine McCann.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The paedophile who sexually abused my daughter has "a callous disregard for the well being of little children and sees them as objects" but he didn't kill Madeleine McCann.

What on earth…?!