Author Topic: An Inept Investigation?  (Read 39952 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #165 on: September 24, 2021, 12:22:50 PM »
Nope it proves he has a image of such .(Not that he has)

Like I've said before, he came across the dead girl left by Smithy, prove he didn't mr Prosecutor. He's got nothing to tie his suspect, thats why he's not been questioned. He'll be questioned as a witness if anything imo.

In the "evidence" wolters has Maddie is still alive...he has said asmuch. Do I have to spell it out again and again. it seems wolters has photo evidence of the abuse of a live Maddie.  abuse she would not have survived so he assumes death..as in the Rui pedro case. That proves abduction

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #166 on: September 24, 2021, 12:27:22 PM »
In the "evidence" wolters has Maddie is still alive...he has said asmuch. Do I have to spell it out again and again. it seems wolters has photo evidence of the abuse of a live Maddie.  abuse she would not have survived so he assumes death..as in the Rui pedro case. That proves abduction

That's quite an assumption.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #167 on: September 24, 2021, 12:31:15 PM »
That's quite an assumption.

not if you listen to what Wolters hass said

Offline jassi

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #168 on: September 24, 2021, 12:31:55 PM »
That's quite an assumption.


Fantasy land, lad, fantasy land.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #169 on: September 24, 2021, 12:34:19 PM »

Fantasy land, lad, fantasy land.

would depend on the evidence he has....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #170 on: September 24, 2021, 12:57:19 PM »
Nope it proves he has a image of such .(Not that he has)

Like I've said before, he came across the dead girl left by Smithy, prove he didn't mr Prosecutor. He's got nothing to tie his suspect, thats why he's not been questioned. He'll be questioned as a witness if anything imo.
That would be an excuse along the lines of "the dog ate my homework" and would be dismissed as laughable.  IMO.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline barrier

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #171 on: September 24, 2021, 01:01:45 PM »
That would be an excuse along the lines of "the dog ate my homework" and would be dismissed as laughable.  IMO.


Wait and see. Smithy has never been identified has he ?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #172 on: September 24, 2021, 01:04:44 PM »

Wait and see. Smithy has never been identified has he ?

I think it was Amaral.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #173 on: September 24, 2021, 01:32:19 PM »

Wait and see. Smithy has never been identified has he ?
What difference does it make to the credibility of the excuse you have put up as a potential defence for Brueckner?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Snowgirl

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #174 on: September 24, 2021, 01:47:23 PM »
In the "evidence" wolters has Maddie is still alive...he has said asmuch. Do I have to spell it out again and again. it seems wolters has photo evidence of the abuse of a live Maddie.  abuse she would not have survived so he assumes death..as in the Rui pedro case. That proves abduction
Are you not contradicting yourself within this post?   
You say first  in the evidence Wolters  has  Madeleine is still. alive ?
So yes please spell it out again for me how "assumes " ( death) becomes concrete evidence ? 

Offline Mr Gray

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #175 on: September 24, 2021, 02:25:13 PM »
Are you not contradicting yourself within this post?   
You say first  in the evidence Wolters  has  Madeleine is still. alive ?
So yes please spell it out again for me how "assumes " ( death) becomes concrete evidence ?

Ive spelt it out several times...Im not really happy spelling it out. From what Wolters has said he has photographic evidence of MM being abused.This is the conclusion raeched by quite afew people following the case. Wolters has made arounf 5 indications his concrete evidence is photographic. He has inferred it shows abuse of MM that is so severe she would not have survived. ....but he does not have absolute proof she didnt.

This may sound far fetched but is exactly what happened in the Rui pedro case...another child abducted in portugal

Offline Snowgirl

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #176 on: September 24, 2021, 02:37:37 PM »
Thankyou .
Why do you think OG , and  let's include the PJ are not seemingly pursuing this with him and more to the point why are the McCanns not insisting on it?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #177 on: September 24, 2021, 02:38:43 PM »
Thankyou .
Why do you think OG , and  let's include the PJ are not seemingly pursuing this with him and more to the point why are the McCanns not insisting on it?

SY have said they are working very closely with the Germans

Offline Snowgirl

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #178 on: September 24, 2021, 02:52:58 PM »
SY have said they are working very closely with the Germans
To justify being granted further funding I expect .
Cressida Dick included the PJ in that announcement .
My own opinion is Wolters might very well say he  has some photos of a female child being abused in such a manner that she cannot possibly have survived  .... truly horrendous for any parent  to  be told that   .... so I'm not 100% believing  him .... bluffing to impress the media more like.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: An Inept Investigation?
« Reply #179 on: September 24, 2021, 03:05:01 PM »
To justify being granted further funding I expect .
Cressida Dick included the PJ in that announcement .
My own opinion is Wolters might very well say he  has some photos of a female child being abused in such a manner that she cannot possibly have survived  .... truly horrendous for any parent  to  be told that   .... so I'm not 100% believing  him .... bluffing to impress the media more like.

I think your ideas are ridiculous.. It's not just Wolters.. He's the spokesman for the entire investigation team.
I don't see any reason to disbelieve him