An Inept Investigation?

[barrier]

I think your ideas are ridiculous.. It's not just Wolters.. He's the spokesman for the entire investigation team.
I don't see any reason to disbelieve him

It could be argued Mitchell is the spokesman for the entire McCann story, should everything from him be believed.

[barrier]

Ive spelt it out several times...Im not really happy spelling it out. From what Wolters has said he has photographic evidence of MM being abused.This is the conclusion raeched by quite afew people following the case. Wolters has made arounf 5 indications his concrete evidence is photographic. He has inferred it shows abuse of MM that is so severe she would not have survived. ....but he does not have absolute proof she didnt.

This may sound far fetched but is exactly what happened in the Rui pedro case...another child abducted in portugal

I've yet to see this supposed hint of abuse, perhaps it only exists where its wanted to exist, ergo abduction.

[Mr Gray]

It could be argued Mitchell is the spokesman for the entire McCann story, should everything from him be believed.

If you want to believe wolters is a fantast and making it all up to impress the press... If you want to believe SY have spent 12 million to protect the McCanns... Both sound totally barmy to me

[barrier]

If you want to believe wolters is a fantast and making it all up to impress the press... If you want to believe SY have spent 12 million to protect the McCanns... Both sound totally barmy to me

Where have I ever said that OG is to protect the McCann's.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Where have I ever said that OG is to protect the McCann's.

What is it for then?

[barrier]

What is it for then?

You tell me, seems as if you and davel share the same opinion.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You tell me, seems as if you and davel share the same opinion.

It seems to me you don't think it has been set up to investigate the disappearance of Madeleine McCann (which is my opinion) but nor will you admit to thinking that it's been set up to protect the McCanns.  So are you saying you just don't know what Operation Grange is for or won't accept that it has been set up in good faith to investigate the child's disappearance?

[Mr Gray]

Where have I ever said that OG is to protect the McCann's.

It's what most sceptics believe... That the mccanns are being protected by SY

[G-Unit]

It seems to me you don't think it has been set up to investigate the disappearance of Madeleine McCann (which is my opinion) but nor will you admit to thinking that it's been set up to protect the McCanns.  So are you saying you just don't know what Operation Grange is for or won't accept that it has been set up in good faith to investigate the child's disappearance?

Do you deny it was set up to investigate Madeleine's abduction?

[Snowgirl]

I think your ideas are ridiculous.. It's not just Wolters.. He's the spokesman for the entire investigation team.
I don't see any reason to disbelieve him

Wolters  and the rest yes, who probably want to keep him in jail for  as long as possible   and rightly so for   for the hideous  crimes he's  been found guilty of but not for something he maybe  hasn't done.
 A stroke of luck  they pounced on,  i.e  that his phone  was in that area  must have been such a  revelation  for them yet they still cant prove he was using it .  Why not ? 

[Mr Gray]

Do you deny it was set up to investigate Madeleine's abduction?

It eas set up to investigate Madeleines abduction after thr scoping exercise showed this was the most likely scenario..  In investigating the abduction it could have discovered an abduction didn't happen.... That doesn't seem to have happened

[Mr Gray]

Wolters  and the rest yes, who probably want to keep him in jail for  as long as possible   and rightly so for   for the hideous  crimes he's  been found guilty of but not for something he maybe  hasn't done.
 A stroke of luck  they pounced on,  i.e  that his phone  was in that area  must have been such a  revelation  for them yet they still cant prove he was using it .  Why not ?

They will have a lot more evidence than that... But you think he's lying so not much point in discussing it

[barrier]

It seems to me you don't think it has been set up to investigate the disappearance of Madeleine McCann (which is my opinion) but nor will you admit to thinking that it's been set up to protect the McCanns.  So are you saying you just don't know what Operation Grange is for or won't accept that it has been set up in good faith to investigate the child's disappearance?

You're gonna have to show me where I've said Grange is set up to protect the Mccann's.

[Snowgirl]

They will have a lot more evidence than that... But you think he's lying so not much point in discussing it

Have I actually said he was lying? Rather I thought I said he was bluffing but correct me   if not .   

[barrier]

It eas set up to investigate Madeleines abduction after thr scoping exercise showed this was the most likely scenario..  In investigating the abduction it could have discovered an abduction didn't happen.... That doesn't seem to have happened

It could be argued the BKA set up an investigation to focus solely on bringing CB to justice over Madeleines disappearance, thats doesn't seemed to have happened either. The one who shall be believed said it wouldn't last more than a couple of Months in July 2020, (I've posted the link where he said it ,before), should he now be disbelieved.