An Inept Investigation?

[Mr Gray]

Have I actually said he was lying? Rather I thought I said he was bluffing but correct me   if not .

I will correct you.  You accused him of saying something  which he knows is not true... That's lying

[Mr Gray]

It could be argued the BKA set up an investigation to focus solely on bringing CB to justice over Madeleines disappearance, thats doesn't seemed to have happened either. The one who shall be believed said it wouldn't last more than a couple of Months in July 2020, (I've posted the link where he said it ,before), should he now be disbelieved.

Perhaps things have changed... You can disbelieve if you want... I think that's very premature

[barrier]

Perhaps things have changed... You can disbelieve if you want... I think that's very premature

Then he shouldn't say what he can't deliver.

In red, I said should he disbelieved , not that I do, its best to read what's written .

[Vertigo Swirl]

Do you deny it was set up to investigate Madeleine's abduction?

No, why do you ask?

[Vertigo Swirl]

You're gonna have to show me where I've said Grange is set up to protect the Mccann's.

I didn’t say you did, I’m simply asking you what you think it was set up for and why.

[barrier]

It seems to me you don't think it has been set up to investigate the disappearance of Madeleine McCann (which is my opinion) but nor will you admit to thinking that it's been set up to protect the McCanns.

You're gonna have to show me where I've said Grange is set up to protect the Mccann's.

I didn’t say you did, I’m simply asking you what you think it was set up for and why.

Say again

[Vertigo Swirl]

Say again

What’s your problem?

[barrier]

What’s your problem?

You answering my post's.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You answering my post's.

No, your problem is not knowing when to use an apostrophe properly.

[Mr Gray]

Then he shouldn't say what he can't deliver.

In red, I said should he disbelieved , not that I do, its best to read what's written .

If you are reccomending he should not be believed you are totally mixed up if you don't believe your own opinion

[Snowgirl]

I will correct you.  You accused him of saying something  which he knows is not true... That's lying

Thanks . My bad .

[G-Unit]

No, why do you ask?

Because I think that was it's purpose all along. That's what it's remit was.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Because I think that was it's purpose all along. That's what it's remit was.

So what?

[Brietta]

It could be argued Mitchell is the spokesman for the entire McCann story, should everything from him be believed.

I think that is quite absurd.

Amaral's perjury conviction proves he is untrustworthy yet it was the botched investigation he led and the book he wrote detailing it which put the flawed narrative in place.

[Brietta]

Wolters  and the rest yes, who probably want to keep him in jail for  as long as possible   and rightly so for   for the hideous  crimes he's  been found guilty of but not for something he maybe  hasn't done.
 A stroke of luck  they pounced on,  i.e  that his phone  was in that area  must have been such a  revelation  for them yet they still cant prove he was using it .  Why not ?

I think you really should be asking why the Policia Judiciaria did not use the phone evidence which was available to them in 2007.

You really do not know what evidence the German investigation holds for the simple reason that they aren't telling you and rightly so - Madeleine's is a case which is under active investigation.