Maddie Basta de Mentiras

[Mr Gray]

By the time its heard at the echr, we'll be all long past caring,(except you) you seem to ignore its not even on a list of noteworthy pending, those that are have had their cases communicated back in 2017.

Noteworthy pending cases
Chamber
Freedom of expression cases
(Article 10)
Patrício Monteiro Telo de Abreu v.
Portugal (no. 42713/15)
Case communicated to the Government on
1 December 2017
The case concerns the applicant’s criminal
conviction for defamation subsequent to a
publication in his blog.
Freitas Rangel v. Portugal
(no. 78873/13)
Case communicated to the Government on
29 November 2017
The case concerns the applicant’s criminal
conviction for offending a legal person on
account of statements made by him about
the Trade Union Association of Judges and
the Trade Union of Public Prosecutors
during a session of Parliament’s Ethics,
Society and Culture Committee in which he
gave his views on the topic of freedom of
expression in Portugal in view of his
experience as a journalist.
Nóbrega v. Portugal (no. 24955/15)
Case communicated to the Government on
29 November 2017
The case concerns disciplinary proceedings
against the applicant, who was a trade
unionist, following statements he made to
the media about other disciplinary
proceedings lodged against him.
Other pending applications on Article 10:
SIC - Sociedade Independente de
Comunicação v. Portugal (no. 29856/13),
Marques dos Reis v. Portugal
(no. 61177/14), and Welsh and Silva Canha
v. Portugal (no. 2) (no. 58106/15)

Your post needs to be directed at faith who seems to think the case has already been decided in amarals favour... More sceptic rubbish

[barrier]

Your post needs to be directed at faith who seems to think the case has already been decided in amarals favour... More sceptic rubbish

You redirect it, you seemed to be concerned.

[Mr Gray]

You redirect it, you seemed to be concerned.

If I was bothered  I would...

[barrier]

If I was bothered  I would...

Oh you're bothered alright.

[Mr Gray]

Oh you're bothered alright.

You think I'm bothered.. Just another thing you ve got wrong..

It looks like it's over for sceptics and Wolters has solved the case... The recent article merely confirms my thoughts so I would think it's fairly accurate
It's hard for you to accept how wrong you have been... Lol

[barrier]

You think I'm bothered.. Just another thing you ve got wrong..

It looks like it's over for sceptics and Wolters has solved the case... The recent article merely confirms my thoughts so I would think it's fairly accurate
It's hard for you to accept how wrong you have been... Lol

You need to read the rubbish thats being printed and then join the dots, its all bollox .

[Vertigo Swirl]

You need to read the rubbish thats being printed and then join the dots, its all bollox .

I take it you are referring to Amaral's book, which is what this thread is about?  If so, yes I agree 100% 

[Mr Gray]

You need to read the rubbish thats being printed and then join the dots, its all bollox .

I don't rely on any rubbish being printed.. I've based my conclusions on what HCW has, said live in interviews..

The only one talking complete rubbish is amaral..

I'm way ahead if you

[barrier]

I don't rely on any rubbish being printed.. I've based my conclusions on what HCW has, said live in interviews..

The only one talking complete rubbish is amaral..

I'm way ahead if you

 

[kizzy]

If the McCanns are successful at the ECHR he could find himself back in court.. They could ask the Portuguese to re-open the original case and the SC judgement be re-examined

IF. such a big word





I'm sure that Gonçalo was not going to release any book before a final decision on the McCanns case against Portugal -  in order to avoid any future legal problems.

As such you mentioned in your post.

It's most likely that their appeal was simply not accepted for consideration -  because it did not meet the necessary criteria.

IMO could be the reason for the barrage of media attention focusing on CB being 100% guilty of a so called abduction.

It seems also  the book could be released in English next week.

[Mr Gray]

IF. such a big word





I'm sure that Gonçalo was not going to release any book before a final decision on the McCanns case against Portugal -  in order to avoid any future legal problems.

As such you mentioned in your post.

It's most likely that their appeal was simply not accepted for consideration -  because it did not meet the necessary criteria.

IMO could be the reason for the barrage of media attention focusing on CB being 100% guilty of a so called abduction.

It seems also  the book could be released in English next week.

i use ..If...to comply with forum prorocol...the case has not been decided yet. you have made a lot of assumptions. the book may well be released in the Uk because the book does not state that Maddie died in the apartmnet and was covered up by the parents.

He may well realises hes lost the ECHR case and is publishing a book which is not linbellous and does not accuse the mccanns..in order to raise some money while he can. Have you read any of the book...from what ive seen its total junk...as expected

[jassi]

i use ..If...to comply with forum prorocol...the case has not been decided yet. you have made a lot of assumptions. the book may well be released in the Uk because the book does not state that Maddie died in the apartmnet and was covered up by the parents.

He may well realises hes lost the ECHR case and is publishing a book which is not linbellous and does not accuse the mccanns..in order to raise some money while he can. Have you read any of the book...from what ive seen its total junk...as expected

You really should know better - it's McCann/Healy v Portugal.

[Mr Gray]

You really should know better - it's McCann/Healy v Portugal.

You obviously don't understand the significance of the case and how it could affect amaral... I obviously  do know better.

Did you know the SC judgement is not final and could be revised.. Not a lot of people know that

[kizzy]

i use ..If...to comply with forum prorocol...the case has not been decided yet. you have made a lot of assumptions. the book may well be released in the Uk because the book does not state that Maddie died in the apartmnet and was covered up by the parents.

He may well realises hes lost the ECHR case and is publishing a book which is not linbellous and does not accuse the mccanns..in order to raise some money while he can. Have you read any of the book...from what ive seen its total junk...as expected

Thought they sued because it was ruining the search for maddie...saying Maddie was dead

Just the same as wolt is now.

[kizzy]

You obviously don't understand the significance of the case and how it could affect amaral... I obviously  do know better.

Did you know the SC judgement is not final and could be revised.. Not a lot of people know that

Why would it be revised....do you know that or just opinionated or guessing.