Author Topic: Maddie Basta de Mentiras  (Read 46440 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #105 on: October 10, 2021, 08:16:20 PM »
It seems to me tha Amaral has taken his last chance to make some money out of Maddies disappearance. He can make alll these claims until evidence is produced to show the McCanns are innocent and maddie was abducted by a paedophile....evidence its clear to me Wolyers has. Once that is shown to be true his reputation will be in tatters


The rich never worry about reputation.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #106 on: October 10, 2021, 08:46:30 PM »

The rich never worry about reputation.

Who told you that?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #107 on: October 10, 2021, 08:51:48 PM »
It’s quite the dumbest thing I ever heard.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #108 on: October 10, 2021, 08:54:52 PM »
Who told you that?

I don’t need to be told.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #109 on: October 10, 2021, 09:47:48 PM »
And this?

“ At the time, Kate McCann, Maddie's mother, downplayed the mark to the authorities, affirming that it was a sunburn. For investigators, the sunburn excuse does not hold water. “
Not libellous.. He is stating a fact which he can probably substantiate.. He isn't saying Kate us lying

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #110 on: October 10, 2021, 10:18:11 PM »
I don’t need to be told.
If the rich don’t care about reputation how do libel lawyers make a living? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #111 on: October 10, 2021, 10:22:39 PM »
Not libellous.. He is stating a fact which he can probably substantiate.. He isn't saying Kate us lying

I never thought I’d see the day that you’d defend Amaral when he was obviously suggesting that the mother was lying. You’ve come far Davel.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #112 on: October 10, 2021, 10:27:39 PM »
I never thought I’d see the day that you’d defend Amaral when he was obviously suggesting that the mother was lying. You’ve come far Davel.
I was equally surprised to see you suggesting Amaral was guilty of libelling Kate McCann.  What a crazy mixed up world!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #113 on: October 10, 2021, 11:05:04 PM »
I never thought I’d see the day that you’d defend Amaral when he was obviously suggesting that the mother was lying. You’ve come far Davel.

I'm not defending Amaral.. I'm defending his right to free speech within the constraints of the ECHR

Offline Eleanor

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #114 on: October 10, 2021, 11:25:53 PM »

Basta de Mentiras.  Enough of The Lies.

What is one supposed to make of that?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #115 on: October 10, 2021, 11:34:04 PM »
Basta de Mentiras.  Enough of The Lies.

What is one supposed to make of that?
One thing it’s clearly not is a note to self.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #116 on: October 10, 2021, 11:46:44 PM »
One thing it’s clearly not is a note to self.

But who does Amaral think is telling the lies and about what?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #117 on: October 11, 2021, 07:30:03 AM »
But who does Amaral think is telling the lies and about what?
Everyone about everything except little George Washington himself, the convicted perjurer, and of course the completely innocent burglar/paedo/rapist.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Lace

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #118 on: October 11, 2021, 08:47:19 AM »
What about this then.

The photo that led Portuguese investigators to interrogate Kate McCann about the bruise on the girl's right wrist was taken days, or hours, before the disappearance. Former inspector Gonçalo Amaral claims that the mark is not compatible with the explanation given by Maddie's parents.

Maddie appears in a photo with a suspicious mark. The PJ investigation maintains that the photograph was taken days, or hours, before the disappearance of the English girl on May 3, 2007, in Praia da Luz, Algarve. Former PJ inspector Gonçalo Amaral, who headed the team in charge of investigating the disappearance, points out that the photo reveals “that the girl has a mark on her right wrist”.

The photograph, which is part of the interim report carried out by the PJ in September 2007, shows, for Gonçalo Amaral, a mark “as if someone had grabbed it and pulled it with excessive force”. At the time, Kate McCann, Maddie's mother, downplayed the mark to the authorities, affirming that it was a sunburn. For investigators, the sunburn excuse does not hold water. The girl then wore short sleeves, meaning that, if it was a sunburn, it would not be so localized and “well drawn”, says Gonçalo Amaral.

The photo also raised doubts, given the possibility of being a photomontage. The former inspector explains that “the body in the photo is that of a child older than Maddie”, then three years old. Gonçalo Amaral argues that Portugal should continue to investigate the case and that this photo should be properly examined, so the mother can be questioned later.

Another photo that raises doubts about its authenticity is one where Gerry McCann is shown sitting at the edge of the pool with his two daughters. “We can see some shadows in there. The direction of shadows and sun is not correct. At the time, we doubted the photo, we thought it was a way to create the image of a good father”, said the former inspector of the PJ. For Gonçalo Amaral, there are doubts about the evidence that the German judicial authorities gathered to accuse, by the end of the year, Christian Brueckner of the abduction and death of Maddie.

Camera and blanket disappeared
There are two objects from the McCanns that were photographed by the scientific police on the night of the disappearance and then went missing: the camera that was on the table and the pink blanket on Maddie's bed. Gonçalo Amaral reveals that the mother said she gave the blanket to the GNR, which didn't happen.

Behind paywall - Correio da Manhã, 10 October 2021
https://www.cmjornal.pt/portugal/detalhe/maddie-tinha-marca-suspeita-num-pulso?ref=HP_PrimeirosDestaques


What about it?  The man is a complete and utter idiot.   'Hey look there's a nasty mark on Madeleine's arm,  where I grabbed her aggressively lets take a photo'!!   

He is listening to the ramblings of the morons.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #119 on: October 11, 2021, 08:49:05 AM »
What about it?  The man is a complete and utter idiot.   'Hey look there's a nasty mark on Madeleine's arm,  where I grabbed her aggressively lets take a photo'!!   

He is listening to the ramblings of the morons.
”Let’s  take a photo of our clearly abused child and circulate it to the entire world”. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".