So you THINK there are words I don't fully grasp the meaning of and you decide for yourself it's a fact.
I dont see how you can come to that conclusion based on my posts.. To me that shows very poor logic.
I've answered your question.. With the clairvoyant ananalogy.
Grimes understanding of evidence... Is very poor imo.. Like the people who think clairvoyants are geniune.
If Eddie makes enough alerts.. 12 in Jersey.. About the same in Luz... He's bound to get one right.
No my question wasn’t
a> What is Grimes understanding of evidence?
b>Is, what a clairvoyant says an example of anecdotal evidence?
So your analogy answers nothing.
My question was:
Statement says missing girl is seen entering into neighbours house (where a dog alerts) and isn’t seen leaving
Statement says missing girl was seen arriving home (where a dog alerts).
Are one or both of the anecdotal witness statements that support said dog alerts?
This question pertains to this thread you started and you seem reluctant to give a clear and precise answer, not an analogy.
I can give you a cite that explains what is anecdotal evidence if it helps.
“Witness statements in a court of law are anecdotal evidence.”https://keystagewiki.com/index.php/Anecdotal_EvidenceIt really doesn't mention a clairvoyants obvious deceptions and leading questions as anecdotal evidence.