Author Topic: Anectdotal witness evidence  (Read 40869 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #165 on: December 27, 2021, 05:48:15 PM »
As regards the alert in a neighbours house..
If the handler was taken to ten empty houses and given no information.... And an alert was only made in the house where a child disappeared from

That would be significant

Isn't that just about what happened in Luz?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #166 on: December 27, 2021, 05:56:11 PM »
Isn't that just about what happened in Luz?

Absolutely  not.. Read it again

What you show  is you don't read and understand carefully
« Last Edit: December 27, 2021, 06:04:00 PM by Davel »

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #167 on: December 27, 2021, 06:05:33 PM »
Absolutely  not.. Read it again

Lets see:
If the handler was taken to ten empty houses and given no information.... And an alert was only made in the house where a child disappeared from


ten empty houses:  5 empty apartments and two villas,
Given no information: was he informed which apartments he was in?
And an alert was only made in the house where a child disappeared from: Check


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #168 on: December 27, 2021, 06:08:49 PM »
Lets see:
If the handler was taken to ten empty houses and given no information.... And an alert was only made in the house where a child disappeared from


ten empty houses:  5 empty apartments and two villas,
Given no information: was he informed which apartments he was in?
And an alert was only made in the house where a child disappeared from: Check

Are you suggesting Grime did not know 5a, was the crime scene

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #169 on: December 27, 2021, 06:10:48 PM »
Are you suggesting Grime did not know 5a, was the crime scene

Has it ever been reported that he did. If it has please provide a cite. Otherwise its just pure conjecture.
Read what you posted again, its virtually a mirror of what happened in Luz.

If the handler was taken to ten empty houses and given no information.... And an alert was only made in the house where a child disappeared from

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #170 on: December 27, 2021, 06:17:36 PM »
Has it ever been reported that he did. If it has please provide a cite. Otherwise its just pure conjecture.
Read what you posted again, its virtually a mirror of what happened in Luz.

If the handler was taken to ten empty houses and given no information.... And an alert was only made in the house where a child disappeared from

What a silly post.. I made a statement which I stand by. 
If Grime did not know 5a was the crime scene then the alerts are highly significant and point to the McCanns guilt.
The question is the surely everyone knew which apt Maddie was abducted from.

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #171 on: December 27, 2021, 06:21:17 PM »
What a silly post.. I made a statement which I stand by. 
If Grime did not know 5a was the crime scene then the alerts are highly significant and point to the McCanns guilt.
The question is the surely everyone knew which apt Maddie was abducted from.

Why do you default to the position that Grime knew which apartment was which, where is any evidence that he was told before hand? He has expressed that he wasn't told which car was which so why would it be different for the apartments. Just let this sink in. You posted

If the handler was taken to ten empty houses and given no information.... And an alert was only made in the house where a child disappeared from

That would be significant


And you stand by this statement.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #172 on: December 27, 2021, 06:28:29 PM »
Why do you default to the position that Grime knew which apartment was which, where is any evidence that he was told before hand? He has expressed that he wasn't told which car was which so why would it be different for the apartments. Just let this sink in. You posted

If the handler was taken to ten empty houses and given no information.... And an alert was only made in the house where a child disappeared from

That would be significant


And you stand by this statement.

Of course I stand by it.  Every statement I make is, reasoned.
It's a very good and important point

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #173 on: December 27, 2021, 06:30:27 PM »
Of course I stand by it.  Every statement I make is, reasoned.
It's a very good and important point

So where is the difference between your statement and the searches in Luz?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #174 on: December 27, 2021, 06:31:47 PM »
What a silly post.. I made a statement which I stand by. 
If Grime did not know 5a was the crime scene then the alerts are highly significant and point to the McCanns guilt.
The question is the surely everyone knew which apt Maddie was abducted from.

You appear to think that the dogs alerted to 5A only because Grime knew the McCanns stayed there. That's quite an accusation based on no evidence.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #175 on: December 27, 2021, 06:33:34 PM »
So where is the difference between your statement and the searches in Luz?
I've explained... And you have, answered.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #176 on: December 27, 2021, 06:36:24 PM »
You appear to think that the dogs alerted to 5A only because Grime knew the McCanns stayed there. That's quite an accusation based on no evidence.

I don't really care, what you think.. It's, of no importance.  I've explained a, scientific method that would give the, alerts, massive scientific credibility

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #177 on: December 27, 2021, 06:37:51 PM »
I've explained... And you have, answered.
So the difference is although you have no evidence to support it, you believe Grime was told before hand who had occupied the apartments.
He wasn't told who the cars belonged to ,but to you, they must have told him the which apartments were which.
Can you confirm it is only your opinion that Grime was told which apartment was which rather than a fact you can prove?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #178 on: December 27, 2021, 06:43:52 PM »
So the difference is although you have no evidence to support it, you believe Grime was told before hand who had occupied the apartments.
He wasn't told who the cars belonged to ,but to you, they must have told him the which apartments were which.
Can you confirm it is only your opinion that Grime was told which apartment was which rather than a fact you can prove?

I can't really bother to reply to such a silly post.  On such an important point we need to deal in facts not speculation

Let me make it really simple for you.. If it was a blind search then the alerrs are highly significant... Strange no ones mentioned it was if that was, the case

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #179 on: December 27, 2021, 06:47:18 PM »
So the difference is although you have no evidence to support it, you believe Grime was told before hand who had occupied the apartments.
He wasn't told who the cars belonged to ,but to you, they must have told him the which apartments were which.
Can you confirm it is only your opinion that Grime was told which apartment was which rather than a fact you can prove?

My belief that grime knew the, apt was the crime scene is based on evidence.. It's my opinion.. It's of no importance. The important point is did he know