Author Topic: The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect  (Read 106637 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

How can we possible know?  She could have wiped it, along with others.

That, in my opinion, is a ridiculous statement based on nothing other than your own prejudice
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

That, in my opinion, is a ridiculous statement based on nothing other than your own prejudice
I think it's a possibility that can't be discounted, after all how do you explain the lack of finger prints from DW and GM on the window / shutter?  Were they both lying in their statements and did Kate both open AND close the window in an attempt to stage the most unconvincing abduction in recorded history?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline barrier

How can we possible know?  She could have wiped it, along with others.

Where's your absolutely gone.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

That, in my opinion, is a ridiculous statement based on nothing other than your own prejudice

You think it's okay to collect evidence wearing only one glove?

Offline jassi

You think it's okay to collect evidence wearing only one glove?

Not being the forensic expert that you clearly are, I couldn't possibly say.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Not being the forensic expert that you clearly are, I couldn't possibly say.
You don't need to be a forensic expert, just someone with a modicum of common sense (which might explain your inability to give an opinion). 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

I think it's a possibility that can't be discounted, after all how do you explain the lack of finger prints from DW and GM on the window / shutter?  Were they both lying in their statements and did Kate both open AND close the window in an attempt to stage the most unconvincing abduction in recorded history?

I don't know who closed the window, although Silvia Batista said Gerry told her and the GNR that it was him.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/SILVIA_BATISTA.htm

Gerry McCann said it was him who closed the shutters.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

I don't know who closed the window, although Silvia Batista said Gerry told her and the GNR that it was him.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/SILVIA_BATISTA.htm

Gerry McCann said it was him who closed the shutters.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm
Well how do you explain the lack of his finger prints on the shutters?  Must've been wearing gloves, hmmm?  Otherwise there can be no explanation apart from he lied right?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Well how do you explain the lack of his finger prints on the shutters?  Must've been wearing gloves, hmmm?  Otherwise there can be no explanation apart from he lied right?

He would have used the strap inside to close the shutters. I don't think any fingerprints were recovered from that.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Ms Para glider

He would have used the strap inside to close the shutters. I don't think any fingerprints were recovered from that.

He then says he went and opened them from the outside though.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

He would have used the strap inside to close the shutters. I don't think any fingerprints were recovered from that.
So you reckon he was lying about going outside to test the shutters then?  And what about DW, was she wearing gloves or lying in your view?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Gerry: look we'll stage an abduction
Kate: how will we do that?
Gerry: well, just before you raise the alarm open the window and the shutter then it will look like someone broke in
Kate: good plan

Hours later Kate opens the window and shutter and then before anyone else enters the room closes the window, Gerry follows in immediately and before anyone else sees him he closes the shutters - from the inside. No evidence of an abduction - d'oh!  Plan backfires spectacularly.
Meanwhile Dianne Webster is just a senile woman who didn't know what the hell was going on, and that nanny woman who claimed to see the window open was obviously high on drugs.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

I don't know who closed the window, although Silvia Batista said Gerry told her and the GNR that it was him.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/SILVIA_BATISTA.htm

Gerry McCann said it was him who closed the shutters.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

Where in the fingerprint report does it mention or record the results from the outside of the bedroom window.  Where does it mention the inside of the shutters ever being examined.
Did they dust the doorknobs?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline sadie

Whether or not Brueckner is tried and convicted does it not occur to you that the perfect vehicle exists for someone of his ilk to join organisations which have been specifically set up to campaign against Madeleine McCann.

Madeleine's Fund was set up to pay for the search for Madeleine McCann.

Operation Grange is involved in an active investigation into Madeleine McCann's disappearance.

I find the fact you feel the need to mention both pejoratively really quite extraordinary.

Among the salient facts we know about Brueckner are that
  • he is computer literate
  • he writes using word documents
  • he communicates via the media - social and MSM
  • he is fluent in English
Shall we go with your scenario of his conviction while bearing in mind that would be for child murder.

There was nothing to prevent him joining any one or any number social media platforms holding the views you constantly bring here ~ much as you have done in the post to which I am replying.

There would have been no more avid "researcher" throwing his weight behind all the campaigns mounted over the years to ensure Madeleine McCann was neither looked for nor had any chance of being found.

That would be his excuse

I wonder what yours is.

Good thinking Brie.   He could be here amongst us, spewing out lies,

Offline sadie

I might be crushed if I attached any value to some people's opinions. As I don't I'm not. Despite almost two years of speculation about Brueckner the Germans appear no nearer to being able to charge him.

I have never seen any point in an abductor opening that window to be honest. Why bother if it wasn't to enter or exit?

There are several reasons why he would open the window.   These have been gone ovr time and again as you must know