Author Topic: The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect  (Read 106706 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Is there the slightest possibility of you setting aside your personal vendetta and bias for a few minutes and setting an example of how to deploy the protocol of posting to the topic of the thread.

One of the known facts we have about Brueckner is that he uses personal contacts with the media in which he certainly has not shown the slightest interest in helping the police with their enquiries or assisting them in finding Madeleine.

Also I seem to have a recollection of something about Holy water in Hell as relayed by his legal advisor to the media.  I think Brueckner is making use of his time in the spotlight.

Ignoring (once again) the insults and criticism directed at me, Brueckner's responses to the media are purely reactive, while the McCanns were proactive. Whether he is innocent or guilty he is under no obligation to help the police with their enquiries. If they ever get round to questioning him, he is as entitled as anyone else to remain silent in reply.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Lace

Without McCann's arrogance and sense of entitlement things would have gone much more smoothly.

IMO

Please give an example of the McCanns arrogance and sense of entitlement.  Thank you

Offline Wonderfulspam

Please give an example of the McCanns arrogance and sense of entitlement.  Thank you

Arrogance: showing an offensive attitude of superiority : proceeding from or characterized by arrogance an arrogant reply

Reporter: "What evidence do you have that there was an abduction, can I ask this question because Amaral say's that you don't have..."

Kate: "I know, I was here, I found my daughter gone, I know more than you do, I know what I saw..."

https://youtu.be/3k5Q7QZNfFA?t=407

Sense of entitlement.

Expecting other people to look for their daughter & offering nothing but wrist bands for a price in return.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline barrier

I do't see labeling him as a psychopathy or anything else is of any importance -he is what he is.

Wouldn't wish to see him wrongly convicted though, or more precisely, without due process of law.

One can never be certain about wrongful conviction - IMO

In Germany one conviction with out a body ended up a miscarriage, very careful are they of convictions with out bodies.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline G-Unit

Arrogance: showing an offensive attitude of superiority : proceeding from or characterized by arrogance an arrogant reply

Reporter: "What evidence do you have that there was an abduction, can I ask this question because Amaral say's that you don't have..."

Kate: "I know, I was here, I found my daughter gone, I know more than you do, I know what I saw..."

https://youtu.be/3k5Q7QZNfFA?t=407

Sense of entitlement.

Expecting other people to look for their daughter & offering nothing but wrist bands for a price in return.

The answer is that an abduction took place because they said so. Just as Wolters expects us to believe a murder took place because he says so.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline barrier

I have seen no arrogance or sense of entitlement.  Just a desire to find their daughter.  Turn that into a crime if you can.

Well Wolters seemingly wants to turn using a phone into some conspiracy,
« Last Edit: February 09, 2022, 02:24:42 PM by Brietta »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Wonderfulspam

The answer is that an abduction took place because they said so. Just as Wolters expects us to believe a murder took place because he says so.

She could have told the reporter what she knows, & what she saw.

That the wind blew the curtains, revealing an open window & shutters, & that there's no way Maddie could have opened the window, shutters & left by herself, & that's how she knows it was an abduction.

Instead, she gives the reporter that rather arrogant response.

I'm sure she's a lovely woman really though, & totally innocent.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline The General

Well Wolters seemingly wants to turn using a phone into some conspiracy,
The opportunity has gone to prove any of that. Gone.
It will never be established that he was inside that apartment, not with a solitary, meaningless phone record.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2022, 02:26:28 PM by Brietta »
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline barrier

The opportunity has gone to prove any of that. Gone.
It will never be established that he was inside that apartment, not with a solitary, meaningless phone record.

I can say then with out fear of contraception ( Nellie Pledge ) he wasn't in 5a on the night of 3/05/2007.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Ahh but Eddie alerted to CC apparently after Kate washed it.
not only that but Kate didn't wash Cuddle Cat the minute Madeleine disappeared, it was some weeks after her disappearance, so the PJ had ample time to take it away for forensic testing beforehand.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

The answer is that an abduction took place because they said so. Just as Wolters expects us to believe a murder took place because he says so.
Not because he said so... Because he says he ha concrete evidence that supports it

Offline Wonderfulspam

not only that but Kate didn't wash Cuddle Cat the minute Madeleine disappeared, it was some weeks after her disappearance, so the PJ had ample time to take it away for forensic testing beforehand.

Yes, Kate had ample opportunity to offer cuddle cat as evidence, & she didn't.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Eleanor

In Germany one conviction with out a body ended up a miscarriage, very careful are they of convictions with out bodies.

Like The McCanns do you thinK?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

The answer is that an abduction took place because they said so. Just as Wolters expects us to believe a murder took place because he says so.
If you KNOW you didn't hide your child's body and you KNOW that there is no way she could have left the apartment on her own then of COURSE you're going to say an abduction took place, what else are you supposed to say?  "Well, maybe she had an accident and died and we hid her body, we just can't recall"?   That's not arrogance, it's just knowing.  Of course if you're so closed minded that you can't entertain the possibility that the McCanns did not hide their kid's body then you won't understand this post.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Not because he said so... Because he says he ha concrete evidence that supports it

Great, extra because he said so.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club