Author Topic: The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect  (Read 106633 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Yes, Kate had ample opportunity to offer cuddle cat as evidence, & she didn't.

I believe she let her other kid play with it.  I wonder why considering it was so precious to her.

https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/CUDDLE_CAT.htm
« Last Edit: February 09, 2022, 01:42:14 PM by jassi »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Wonderfulspam

If you KNOW you didn't hide your child's body and you KNOW that there is no way she could have left the apartment on her own then of COURSE you're going to say an abduction took place, what else are you supposed to say?  "Well, maybe she had an accident and died and we hid her body, we just can't recall"?   That's not arrogance, it's just knowing.  Of course if you're so closed minded that you can't entertain the possibility that the McCanns did not hide their kid's body then you won't understand this post.

He asked for evidence.

What she knows, not, that she knows.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline barrier

Like The McCanns do you thinK?

Don't know are they likely to go on trial in Germany for something ?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

I believe she let her other kid play with it.  I wonder why considering it was so precious to her.

https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/CUDDLE_CAT.htm

Just how pathetic can anyone get?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

I believe she let her other kid play with it.  I wonder why considering it was so precious to her.

https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/CUDDLE_CAT.htm
It's not hard to work out why, if you have ever been a parent, or have anything resembling a heart or a kind bone in your body (unlikely I know!)
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Just how pathetic can anyone get?

I know. You'g have thought she would have looked after it better.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Just how pathetic can anyone get?
The hatred and contempt will never die, well not until they have all kicked the bucket.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

The hatred and contempt will never die, well not until they have all kicked the bucket.

What, the McCanns you mean?

No, I'd still hate them long after they're dead
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Brietta

Ignoring (once again) the insults and criticism directed at me, Brueckner's responses to the media are purely reactive, while the McCanns were proactive. Whether he is innocent or guilty he is under no obligation to help the police with their enquiries. If they ever get round to questioning him, he is as entitled as anyone else to remain silent in reply.

The known fact is that Brueckner is in contact with the media.  His reasoning for doing so is unknown.

The known fact is that Brueckner continues be under investigation for the suspected murder of Madeleine McCann and it is a known fact that Brueckner has been known to police investigating Madeleine's disappearance since 2007 if Goncalo Amaral is to be believed - and on various occasions since then.

Nor is there the slightest possibility that Brueckner is being treated while in custody for his other crimes with anything other than his statutory rights both German and European.
It is risible to suggest or imply anything other than that.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline jassi

What, the McCanns you mean?

No, I'd still hate them long after they're dead


I wouldn't go quite as far as that, but utter contempt certainly.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Lace

I believe she let her other kid play with it.  I wonder why considering it was so precious to her.

https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/CUDDLE_CAT.htm

Do you think that maybe Amelie was missing Madeleine and holding CC give her some comfort?

Offline Lace

Arrogance: showing an offensive attitude of superiority : proceeding from or characterized by arrogance an arrogant reply

Reporter: "What evidence do you have that there was an abduction, can I ask this question because Amaral say's that you don't have..."

Kate: "I know, I was here, I found my daughter gone, I know more than you do, I know what I saw..."

https://youtu.be/3k5Q7QZNfFA?t=407

Sense of entitlement.

Expecting other people to look for their daughter & offering nothing but wrist bands for a price in return.

Well with the reporter coming at her with the evidence Amaral had,  I quite agree with what Kate said in return.

The McCann's did search for their daughter,   afterwards they were answering questions from the police.   How many parents go out and search when the Police have taken over?

Offline Lace


I wouldn't go quite as far as that, but utter contempt certainly.

Why?

Offline G-Unit

If you KNOW you didn't hide your child's body and you KNOW that there is no way she could have left the apartment on her own then of COURSE you're going to say an abduction took place, what else are you supposed to say?  "Well, maybe she had an accident and died and we hid her body, we just can't recall"?   That's not arrogance, it's just knowing.  Of course if you're so closed minded that you can't entertain the possibility that the McCanns did not hide their kid's body then you won't understand this post.

Why should anyone believe them?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

The answer is that an abduction took place because they said so. Just as Wolters expects us to believe a murder took place because he says so.

It is alleged that Brueckner had been employed in various capacities around the grounds of the holiday complex from which Madeleine vanished.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....