The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect

[G-Unit]

The first protocol which was broken as far as Brueckner is concerned was - The ex-cop, removed as head of the Madeleine McCann probe in October 2007 for criticising the British police, made his latest comments about the case on a show called 'En El Punta de Mira' about missing adults and children which was aired on Spanish national TV station Cuatro.

Using this vehicleAmaral continued with his slurs against Madeleine’s parents and his conspiracy theories against the British State. Later with the addition of a brand new bogey man; not the suspect – but the German Prosecutor the press having failed to pick up his initial subliminal podcast reveal.

Former Portuguese police chief Goncalo Amaral has claimed for the first time a German paedophile probed over Madeleine McCann's disappearance is not Martin Ney.

The ex-cop sparked speculation Hamburg-born child strangler Ney was the prime suspect after telling an Australian podcast earlier this year investigators were focusing on a German paedophile in prison.

He failed to identify Ney by name at the time, describing the suspect only as someone who had been ruled out of the investigation into the missing British youngster in 2008 but later jailed in his home country.

Now Amaral, the original lead investigator in the case, has fuelled new speculation about his identity by telling a Spanish TV programme: 'A paedophile who is German and serving life for killing children has been spoken about.
'What I know is that the suspect is not him, it's another man. He's also in prison in Germany. He's also a paedophile.
'Years later, many years later, it appears that in an Internet chatroom there is a conversation between that person and another person where they talk about Madeleine.'

He responded: 'It can't be him' when he was shown a photo of Ney before adding in a false and vile jibe at Madeleine McCann's father: ...

Police in the UK and Portugal, who are leading separate investigations into Madeleine McCann's May 3 2007 disappearance from the Algarve holiday resort of Praia da Luz, declined to comment on Portuguese reports around the 12th anniversary that investigators had a 'new lead and a new suspect.'

The Policia Judiciaria said in a statement released in May after leading Portuguese daily Correio da Manha said a new suspect had been flagged up to investigators in Lisbon and Porto by Scotland Yard: 'The investigation into the disappearance of an English child in Praia da Luz in 2007, remains open within the framework of an investigation supervised by Portimao's Public Ministry.
'This investigation has been developed in conjunction with international authorities, following police and judicial rules of cooperation justified by the circumstances of the situation.
'The PJ does not feel it is appropriate to make any further clarifications in the interests of the investigation.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7741505/Ex-Portuguese-police-chief-claims-leading-Madeleine-McCann-suspect-mystery-German-paedophile.html

Without Amaral's blatant leaks to the media at a very sensitive time in the investigation I suspect that even now we might still not have been aware of Brueckner and Hazel Behan would still have been ignorant of the rape perpetrated by him which so mirrored her horrific experience.
Sceptics would have been spared the angst of having to safeguard Brueckner's so next time you criticise the Germans, please give a brief nod to the circumstances in which Brueckner's name arrived in the public domain.

Are you saying Amaral named Brueckner?

[Brietta]

Are you saying Amaral named Brueckner?

You have read the link (I presume 😁)  What do you think Amaral intimated in his Australian podcast and the Spanish TV interview.

[Mr Gray]

Are you saying Amaral named Brueckner?

Amaral began the identification...
The newspapers identified him.. >

[barrier]

Without Amaral's blatant leaks to the media at a very sensitive time in the investigation I suspect that even now we might still not have been aware of Brueckner and Hazel Behan would still have been ignorant of the rape perpetrated by him which so mirrored her horrific experience.
Sceptics would have been spared the angst of having to safeguard Brueckner's so next time you criticise the Germans, please give a brief nod to the circumstances in which Brueckner's name arrived in the public domain.

Wolters said last summer he'd charge CB with the rape in 12 weeks, thats not happened nor has he written to the McCann's telling them their daughter is dead, that bloke sure knows how to piss people about.

[Mr Gray]

Wolters said last summer he'd charge CB with the rape in 12 weeks, thats not happened nor has he written to the McCann's telling them their daughter is dead, that bloke sure knows how to piss people about.

I know different

[jassi]

Wolters said last summer he'd charge CB with the rape in 12 weeks, thats not happened nor has he written to the McCann's telling them their daughter is dead, that bloke sure knows how to piss people about.

Latest update was February, according some media reports, I think, so shouldn't be long now.

[Mr Gray]

the PJ have had 15 yeras to solve the crime

[G-Unit]

the PJ have had 15 yeras to solve the crime

The marvelous (sic) Met have been at it for 11 years, the PJ for 12, the Germans for 5, is it? Next!

[Mr Gray]

The marvelous (sic) Met have been at it for 11 years, the PJ for 12, the Germans for 5, is it? Next!

According to the Germans they know Maddie was abducted by a stranger

[Vertigo Swirl]

The marvelous (sic) Met have been at it for 11 years, the PJ for 12, the Germans for 5, is it? Next!

Criminal masterminds them McCanns innit.

[G-Unit]

According to the Germans they know Maddie was abducted by a stranger

I presume by 'Germans' you mean Wolters? I agree with posters on websleuths that he probably isn't in charge of the case, he's just a spokesman, and one who dealt really badly with the media too.

[Angelo222]

According to the Germans they know Maddie was abducted by a stranger

Easy for them to say without the slightest shred of proof.

[G-Unit]

Easy for them to say without the slightest shred of proof.

At the moment they seem to be saying nothing. Maybe they've said too much?

[jassi]

Easy for them to say without the slightest shred of proof.

Sounds to me as if they probably took Grange's word for that - they think it's stranger abduction without actual proof.

IMO

[Vertigo Swirl]

I presume by 'Germans' you mean Wolters? I agree with posters on websleuths that he probably isn't in charge of the case, he's just a spokesman, and one who dealt really badly with the media too.

It took you 5 days to come up with this reply to break the forum silence? For shame! 

If he's done so very badly, and is merely a mouthpiece why hasn't he been sacked by the Germans?  Any ideas?