[/b]
Which is at complete odds of SY who pushed the time onto 10pm after being almost certain Tanner man was not the abductor.
That was under the leadership of one man DCI Andy Red
WOOD. I wonder if he got it right with at least three things that point against the man being Dr Totman. There was a lot of questioning on forums after I pointed out that Dr. Totman was going in the wrong direction from the Creche. DCI Redwood retired pretty sharply after the PdL on site investigaton.
My sargeant at OG , DS Gary Red
MOND took over at a hands on level. He showed a good deal of interest in my theory. We talked for about 40 mins IIRC. There was another ?Sargeant sitting in the corner observing. I was introduced and afterwards I wondered if she was assessing whether or not I was barmy, cos the theory was so different and unusual, yet based upon proven fact I must have passed the observation test because they showed at least two of my folders on Crimewatch UK.
They also made a comment about "one person had done an indepth analysis that had changed the direction of the investigation." A policeman was carrying one of my folders as it was said
Additionally, I wonder if Dr Totman could have managed to carry his daughter all the way from the creche with her lying across his arms as illustrated. The leverage on his arms would be immense. It would have been much more natural and easier to carry her on his shoulder as Gerry did with Sean when he descended the aircrafts steps on arrival back in the UK. He was an experienced father and knew the easiest way to carry his daughter, so why was he carrying her across his arms? Was that detail one added by OG to make the possible sighting more 'real' to the world? Dunno
With Tannerman carrying 'Madeleine' across his arms as he did, I am inclined to think that he was not a father. This fits with Brueckner, BUT please,please , this observation does not mean Tannerman was Brueckner. Let's not jump to conclusions.
Carrying her across his arms in this way also indicates that he was expecting a quick pick up .
I understand the likely protests that "he wanted a little child to mess with for days", so he wouldn't be given the task by Mr Big.
We now know that he was part of a drug cartel, so he would know that if he did anything to Madeleine that displeased Mr Big, he was likely to have his fingers and "crown jewels" sliced off, his leg bones smashed and ear cut off. ..... And he was only supposed to hold her for the time, merely seconds, for the pick up vehicle to come from the little car park across the road from the Tapas reception.. But it didn't come because Gerry was in the way chatting with Jez. The watcher/ getaway driver didn't know because the two men were hidden from his sight by the protuding wall of Unit 6 building.
Hope you have taken the time to examine the situation of the protuding wall and placements of G and J on GE.
And, of course, Breuckner could have been the "get in and lift Madeleine operator" within 5a. He might have passed Madeleine to Tannerman, then fast footed it out of there. Dunno .
This is all IMHO, but it fits. Can you add to it Gunit, you helped me before.
Now, if you will excuse me, I am tired, but please do examine GE, both street scene and birds eye view.
.... zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....
