The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect

[jassi]

Imagine the comments from supporters if Portugal had lost and chose to ignore the ruling.

Fortunately the Portuguese didn't need to ignore the ruling as they won.

[Eleanor]

Brueckner will be charged with his crimes against Maddie after these other cases have been dealt with, so I'm reliably informed.
Just be patient.

And then we might see what Brueckner has to say if he is convicted.  Brueckner won't go down alone.

I think that Amaral could be involved in this after all he has had to say in an attempt to interfere in the course of justice.

But this is only my Theory for which I am entitled according to ECHR Law.

[G-Unit]

Your opinion isn't worth anything.. I've proved mine is. Every point zi made was absolutely correct... Man city vs tranmere... The McCanns had a poor lawyer

Gunit said ECHR law governs UK... She's wrong.. So who has the best legal knowledge.

The ECHR ruled the UK could not stop prisoners voting... The govt ignored it

"The McCanns had a poor lawyer" says Mr Gray. Why? Because the lawyer lost a case which Mr Gray thought should have been won. Are all lawyers who lose cases 'poor, or is it the cases which are poor? I vote for the latter.

[Mr Gray]

Have always said wolt is more interested in solving other cases than what happened to Maddie.

Another one imo used Maddie to get maximum publicity.


This month, prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters said there is no end in sight to the Madeleine case.

But he is preparing to give a TV update on five other cases linked to Brueckner, who is currently in jail for raping a woman aged 72 in Portugal.


Brueckner, 43, denies any wrongdoing and has not been charged with any offence in relation to Madeleine.

Mr Bleksley said: “My concern is this is going to end up being one of the great unsolved crime mysteries.

“I don’t share Wolters’ optimism. I think he should put up or shut up. If you’ve got the evidence, stick him on the sheet, as we used to say.”


https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/police-budget-madeleine-mccann-probe-28073248

LOL.. Do you believe everything in the daily mirror

[Mr Gray]

"The McCanns had a poor lawyer" says Mr Gray. Why? Because the lawyer lost a case which Mr Gray thought should have been won. Are all lawyers who lose cases 'poor, or is it the cases which are poor? I vote for the latter.

Al my opinions are based on sound evidence. If you are going too the. ECHR it makes sense to employ a specialist lawyer... Is that a fact or not

[Mr Gray]

"The McCanns had a poor lawyer" says Mr Gray. Why? Because the lawyer lost a case which Mr Gray thought should have been won. Are all lawyers who lose cases 'poor, or is it the cases which are poor? I vote for the latter.

Once again a junk post. My argument is that the proven facts... Which were not facts do not seem to have been challenged... They claimed the mcs had been cleared ed by the archiving report... There's no precise defn of being cleared..

And then the Mc's employ the same lawyer.. To go to the ECHR... Daft

[G-Unit]

Al my opinions are based on sound evidence. If you are going too the. ECHR it makes sense to employ a specialist lawyer... Is that a fact or not

If you are seeking to lay the blame for the McCann's failure on their lawyers, then they must share the blame for choosing crap lawyers.

[Mr Gray]

If you are seeking to lay the blame for the McCann's failure on their lawyers, then they must share the blame for choosing crap lawyers.

Absolutely agree

[Mr Gray]

The naive sceptics don't seem to understand the difference a good lawyer with lots of experience in the area of law... Makes to the outcome.

[Wonderfulspam]

If you are seeking to lay the blame for the McCann's failure on their lawyers, then they must share the blame for choosing crap lawyers.

I don't believe for a minute Gerry wouldn't have badgered his lawyer half to death over the cadaver alerts.

[Eleanor]

So many of you don't seem to realise the fall out from this.  Davel can argue Law while I argue Me Too.  The ECHR have just set a precedence  that will allow me to say what ever I like without fear of libel and with no evidence.

Anthony Bennett should have a look at this one.

[faithlilly]

I don't believe for a minute Gerry wouldn't have badgered his lawyer half to death over the cadaver alerts.

I think that the parents were probably advised that the ECRH application was going to fly but Gerry, pugnacious as ever, ignored the advice, fearing public perception if they didn’t.

[Wonderfulspam]

So many of you don't seem to realise the fall out from this.  Davel can argue Law while I argue Me Too.  The ECHR have just set a precedence  that will allow me to say what ever I like without fear of libel and with no evidence.

Anthony Bennett should have a look at this one.

No they haven't.
They've set the precedent that if an ex inspector writes a book based on police files that are public & conclusions reached by his investigation from said files, then they can write thr book about such & it isn't libel.

[Wonderfulspam]

There's two other threads about the ECHR, yet here we are discussing it on a thread about Brueckner.
What has happened to this forum?
It's all over the shop.

[jassi]

As an aside, have Portugal released police files from other cases or was the McCann case a one-off ?

If the latter, I wonder why that should be