The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect

[jassi]

We know for a fact that Brueckner does not have an alibi.

You ask ~ "Does he need one ?"

My opinion is that his defence team would find one terribly useful because if he had one as claimed it could well have ruled him out as prime suspect and arguido.

I'm sure they would,but they don't actually need one.
The onus of proof is always on the prosecutor

[Brietta]

I'm sure they would,but they don't actually need one.
The onus of proof is always on the prosecutor

And the prosecutor has proved beyond doubt that despite claims to the contrary ~ Brueckner has no exonerating alibi.

[jassi]

And the prosecutor has proved beyond doubt that despite claims to the contrary ~ Brueckner has no exonerating alibi.

But that doesn't matter. What Wolters has to do is prove that Brueckner is guilty of offences against Madeleine.

[G-Unit]

We know for a fact that Brueckner does not have an alibi.

You ask ~ "Does he need one ?"

My opinion is that his defence team would find one terribly useful because if he had one as claimed it could well have ruled him out as prime suspect and arguido.

We know what Wolters says, but we don't know what has gone on between Brueckner and his lawyer. They could have things up their sleeves which you have no idea about.

[jassi]

As neither Brueckner, nor his lawyer are giving press conferences, we can have no idea what their game plan is.

As regards Madeleine, they may not even need one.

[Wonderfulspam]

I'm sure they would,but they don't actually need one.
The onus of proof is always on the prosecutor

I'm not sure how many more times this will need explaining.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm sure they would,but they don't actually need one.
The onus of proof is always on the prosecutor

They may not need one per se but if the evidence against Bruckner is compelling, then it can all be wiped away with a single cast iron alibi.   

[Wonderfulspam]

They may not need one per se but if the evidence against Bruckner is compelling, then it can all be wiped away with a single cast iron alibi.   

The evidence is concrete. If we knew the evidence Wolters has then we'd be in no doubt.
It's impossible for Brueckner to refute it.
He is the murderer, no doubt about it & Wolters will prove as much in court one day. Really, he will.

[Brietta]

We know what Wolters says, but we don't know what has gone on between Brueckner and his lawyer. They could have things up their sleeves which you have no idea about.

I'm not sure that very much will have been stuffed up either Brueckner's or Herr Fulscher's sleeves at the moment.

I rather imagine Herr Fulcher's full attention will be concentrated on the five indictments for sexual crimes his client faces at present and since he will not be charged with any offences regarding Madeleine till well into 2023 neither Brueckner, Herr Fulcher or yourself have the slightest notion of the evidence the prosecution has.

Who knows, it might even be enough to cause all three of you to fall off your chairs.

[Brietta]

As neither Brueckner, nor his lawyer are giving press conferences, we can have no idea what their game plan is.

As regards Madeleine, they may not even need one.

Far too busy, I would imagine apart from it being nothing to do with them.  The German justice system is in control here.

Five very serious charges have been lodged against Brueckner.

So first things first.

[Brietta]

They may not need one per se but if the evidence against Bruckner is compelling, then it can all be wiped away with a single cast iron alibi.   

Particularly since Brueckner laid public claim to having one. 

[jassi]

Particularly since Brueckner laid public claim to having one.

Did he, or was that just the Tabloids ?

[Brietta]

Did he, or was that just the Tabloids ?

Do you pretend to know anything at all about this case or are you just being deliberately obtuse?

According to the suspect, he drove the woman to a nearby airport the following day, and they were stopped and photographed at a police checkpoint on the night of Madeleine's disappearance.

At airport security, the woman was arrested for having illegal pepper spray in her bag and later appeared in court, according to Brueckner.

Brueckner says Portuguese officials most likely have a record of these events and should be able to confirm his alibi.
https://www.inquisitr.com/10006912/madeleine-mccann-suspect-claims-to-have-alibi


Another fact that we know is that Brueckner has not communicated with the authorities, but did communicate via tabloids when he felt like it.

When checked I believe the date of the airport offence did not correspond with Brueckner's account of events therefore destroying his "alibi".
What I think it may have done was to confirm Brueckner's below the radar presence in Portugal for days after May 3 before he left for his bolthole in Germany.


Wolters recalled that “I was asked if we had found evidence of anything by Madeleine McCann in the suspect’s van and I said I couldn’t talk about the investigation, that’s all. We haven’t found any fibers, and I can say that the new evidence we have is not forensic evidence, but I am not authorized to give you more details. We remain convinced that the suspect in prison is responsible for the crime. There is no alibi. The suspect did not give us an alibi and we did not find an alibi during our investigations.”
Hans Christian Wolters
https://cvvnews.com/brueckner-has-no-alibi-and-there-is-non-forensic-evidence-that-confirms-his-involvement/

[jassi]

All I see in your links are other people saying what Brueckner said.

[Brietta]

All I see in your links are other people saying what Brueckner said.

But just how solid is Brueckner's alibi?

German prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters, who is leading the investigation into Brueckern's alleged involvement in Madeleine's disappearance, cast doubt on the suspect's story.

Wolters said that "nothing" he has heard so far suggests Brueckner is telling the truth.

"What we found out,
it all went in the other direction,
so was rather incriminating,
without me being able to elaborate on that now," the prosecutor explained to the press.
https://www.inquisitr.com/10006912/madeleine-mccann-suspect-claims-to-have-alibi