The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect

[G-Unit]

So - Jimmy Savile, Clement Freud, Nigel Nessling, etc - not paedophiles.  OK then.  We must stop labelling these people paedos until they have a medical certificate.

You'll have to try to work it out for yourself. All I said was that no-one can be a convicted paedophile, which is true.

[Eleanor]

Well, she says she did, & if she really did, her reason for doing so could be self inflicted.

Not possible, SweetCheeks.  And you are more sick that I thought you were.

[Wonderfulspam]

Not possible, SweetCheeks.  And you are more sick that I thought you were.

Would that the be because of the logistical impossibility you often mention? The one that's easily debunked by the presence of bin collections?

[barrier]

Would that the be because of the logistical impossibility you often mention? The one that's easily debunked by the presence of bin collections?

Now if it turns out CB used a bin............

[barrier]

The Sexual Act with a very small child could so easily kill that child, albeit unintentionally.  Which is why I try not to think about it.  But I expect that some do.  .

Snipped.

Police who look at such stuff in criminal cases, are they told to look or volunteer ? must leave a scar for life.

[Wonderfulspam]

Now if it turns out CB used a bin............

Well, that would destroy the evidence.

[Eleanor]

Snipped.

Police who look at such stuff in criminal cases, are they told to look or volunteer ? must leave a scar for life.

I once knew a policeman who did this.  He was told to do so.  He wasn't a good state by the time I met him.  Shortly after he left The Police.  But I don't think he got much help with his mental health.

[Wonderfulspam]

Patience , because he whipped the rape victims he killed Madeleine, because he made a girl grab his todger he killed Madeleine, because he exposed himself to a girl in a playground he killed Madeleine, it all makes sense, just wait and see.

You forget he also told his mates he murdered Maddie & destroyed the evidence.

Diane M, Hazel B, Maddie. In all 3 cases the patio doors were left unlocked.

That about sums up Wolters evidence.

But wait for the Behan trial. The 12" machete she describes will be an exact match to the machete in the photo of Maddie, or something or other.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You'll have to try to work it out for yourself. All I said was that no-one can be a convicted paedophile, which is true.

I have already worked it out thanks, as you can see from my previous posts.  It IS splitting hairs just to be argumentative to say that CB is not a convicted paedophile IMO.  Google "convicted paedophile" and you get a million hits from every media outlet in the world, practically - best you advise them they are ALL wrong.

[Wonderfulspam]

I have already worked it out thanks, as you can see from my previous posts.  It IS splitting hairs just to be argumentative IMO.

Well there doesn't seem to be any connection between Brueckner & Madeleine's disappearance we can discuss, & we do have to argue about something I suppose.

[G-Unit]

I have already worked it out thanks, as you can see from my previous posts.  It IS splitting hairs just to be argumentative to say that CB is not a convicted paedophile IMO.  Google "convicted paedophile" and you get a million hits from every media outlet in the world, practically - best you advise them they are ALL wrong.

It wouldn't be the first time the media went for the sensationalist headlines, would it? Getting things right isn't their main aim; selling a story is what it's about.

[Eleanor]

It wouldn't be the first time the media went for the sensationalist headlines, would it? Getting things right isn't their main aim; selling a story is what it's about.

This is a getting ridiculous now.  Before much longer Brueckner will be the greatest Miscarriage of Justice of all time.  And banged up for a host of crimes he never committed.  Poor Soul.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It wouldn't be the first time the media went for the sensationalist headlines, would it? Getting things right isn't their main aim; selling a story is what it's about.

It's a bit more than just sensationalist headlines, it's ubiquitous, widespread, even the BBC do it.  It's not a question of sensationalism, or do you think referring to a convicted child sex abuser instead is less sensationalist?

[barrier]

It wouldn't be the first time the media went for the sensationalist headlines, would it? Getting things right isn't their main aim; selling a story is what it's about.

This is a getting ridiculous now.  Before much longer Brueckner will be the greatest Miscarriage of Justice of all time.  And banged up for a host of crimes he never committed.  Poor Soul.

What heading do you consider Saville falls under.

[Eleanor]

It's a bit more than just sensationalist headlines, it's ubiquitous, widespread, even the BBC do it.  It's not a question of sensationalism, or do you think referring to a convicted child sex abuser instead is less sensationalist?

There is no sense anymore amongst Sceptics.  The McCanns done it so it can't be Brueckner.  It really is as simple as that, without an iota of proof against The McCanns.

I don't really understand their motivation and would far rather not get into their deep seated problems.

For the moment I would like to see Brueckner locked up for a very long time.