Author Topic: It has taken fifteen years ~ is Madeleine's case close to being solved?  (Read 37883 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

I have a love/hate relationship with Spammy.  So outragious are some of her ideas that she makes me laugh.  She can be kinda droll.

I hate it when she runs down The Mccanns, and think of her as like Junior school age, then .... WHOOPS, up comes a good post well worthy of the forum.

And in certain areas she shows real compassion.  Can't think why she so hates the Mccanns.
@)(++(* she certainly is a very naughty little trollette that's for sure...  8(0(*
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

I like to see evidence, which doesn't seem to be one of your priorities.

But if you want a toss up between The McCanns and Brueckner there is no contest.

As for being close to being solved.  I am sticking with Wolters for now, although I don't much care what Brueckner gets banged up for, while you appear to favour Rapists and Paedophiles.

That’s below you Eleanor. I’d expect that from Brietta but not you. I think G deserves an apology for your last comment. Thinking there is not enough evidence to convict a paedophile of a crime doesn’t mean that you ‘favour’ them.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

If what we have been told is true and I've no reason to doubt it, Brueckner will face other charges for crimes of a sexual nature long before he will ever have charges laid against him for crimes against Madeleine.

All the current crimes for which he is presently suspect were committed in Portugal and the only hope of justice being served is from the German Courts.  The vicious torture and rape for which he is currently serving time in Germany was committed in Portugal but had to be tried in Germany.

Loud and clear it tells me that the Portuguese Justice System pays scant regard to crimes of a sexual nature carried out against women and children and in that regard is not fit for purpose.

It must be rather unique for a Sovereign Nation to be so dependent on another country to police crimes committed within it's borders as the only hope of justice for crime victims.

Perhaps the U.K. should be sending their rape cases to Germany too as only 1.6% of reported rapes result in any sort of action.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/may/23/fewer-than-one-in-60-cases-lead-to-charge-in-england-and-wales
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline G-Unit

That’s below you Eleanor. I’d expect that from Brietta but not you. I think G deserves an apology for your last comment. Thinking there is not enough evidence to convict a paedophile of a crime doesn’t mean that you ‘favour’ them.

It does to an illogical mind.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Perhaps the U.K. should be sending their rape cases to Germany too as only 1.6% of reported rapes result in any sort of action.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/may/23/fewer-than-one-in-60-cases-lead-to-charge-in-england-and-wales
what’s the rate in Germany then?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

That’s below you Eleanor. I’d expect that from Brietta but not you. I think G deserves an apology for your last comment. Thinking there is not enough evidence to convict a paedophile of a crime doesn’t mean that you ‘favour’ them.

Really?  But that is not what I said.  That is below you.

Offline faithlilly

what’s the rate in Germany then?

No idea but isn’t that where failing states send their rape cases?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline G-Unit

Really?  But that is not what I said.  That is below you.

This is what you said to me;

"you appear to favour Rapists and Paedophiles."

Explain yourself then.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Really?  But that is not what I said.  That is below you.

You did Eleanor.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

It does to an illogical mind.

You don't even know what Logical means.  You have been accusing The McCanns without evidence for some considerable time.  This is a disgrace.  What evidence do you have?

Don't take me on, Sweetie.  I have tried not to belittle you too much.  But I can if I so wish.

Offline Eleanor

No idea but isn’t that where failing states send their rape cases?

That is such a laugh.  It's a good job that I like you.

Offline G-Unit

You don't even know what Logical means.  You have been accusing The McCanns without evidence for some considerable time.  This is a disgrace.  What evidence do you have?

Don't take me on, Sweetie. I have tried not to belittle you too much.  But I can if I so wish.

Right back atcha.
« Last Edit: May 09, 2022, 07:26:38 PM by G-Unit »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

This is what you said to me;

"you appear to favour Rapists and Paedophiles."

Explain yourself then.

You afford Rapists and Paedophiles more rights to innocence than you afford to The McCanns.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

No idea but isn’t that where failing states send their rape cases?
Said who?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

You did Eleanor.

No I did not.  I am an equal opportunities sort of person.