It has taken fifteen years ~ is Madeleine's case close to being solved?

[Wonderfulspam]

Confirms he has been served legal files... For the Behan case no doubt... Looks like things are moving.

Yeah, he's being charged with rape, he might even get convicted of rape.

In McCann/Brueckner desperation world, this means he'll be charged with murdering Maddie sometime shortly thereafter.

[Mr Gray]

Wolters has indicated a connection between the Maddie case,  the Behan case and the American rape and a successful conviction for the Behan case could help the Maddie case.  We know the two rapes were filmed.. Another pointer to a video in the McCann case

[Wonderfulspam]

I have been wondering when the Hitler angle would raise it's ugly head, although coming from Brueckner is a surprise, considering the depths of his own depravity.

Brueckner already mentioned my favourite political leader when he said he was now the worlds most famous German (Hitler was Austrian).

[Wonderfulspam]

Wolters has indicated a connection between the Maddie case,  the Behan case and the American rape[/b][/size] and a successful conviction for the Behan case could help the Maddie case.  We know the two rapes were filmed.. Another pointer to a video in the McCann case

Oh, so now it's a video, not a photo?

Right, I suppose we can just imagine any old evidence really, when the need takes us.

[Wonderfulspam]

So there's old Brueckner, sitting in jail, knowing full well he made that paedo photo/video/potato print painting of Maddie, & that Wolters has it firmly in his possession, along with all the other concrete evidence, & yet, rather than cowering or trying to explain anything away, he's blatantly ripping the prosecutor drawing cartoons mocking him & telling him to put up or shut up.

Confident abductor/murderer old Brueckner, isn't he.

Or, maybe it's just that he had absolutely nothing at all to do with Madeleine's disappearance, could be that couldn't it.

[Brietta]

Is this another letter to his penpal McFadden?

He wrote: “I’m wondering why people still ask me where I was on 3 May 2007.

“It is not on me to present evidence.  Ask the prosecutor in the same overkill way like it happens with me.

Seems there is absolutely no chance that he has an alibi for 3 May 2007.  Else why not just say who or what that may be? simple enough one might think.

On the other hand - I believe there may have been some thought given to the possibility that the abductor may have had an accomplice which might be concentrating minds a bit.

[Wonderfulspam]

He wrote: “I’m wondering why people still ask me where I was on 3 May 2007.

“It is not on me to present evidence.  Ask the prosecutor in the same overkill way like it happens with me.

Seems there is absolutely no chance that he has an alibi for 3 May 2007.  Else why not just say who or what that may be? simple enough one might think.

On the other hand - I believe there may have been some thought given to the possibility that the abductor may have had an accomplice which might be concentrating minds a bit.

Wolters can't prove Brueckner actually abducted Maddie, or, that Maddie was ever abducted in the first place, so bit of a moot point really.

[Brietta]

I have been wondering when the Hitler angle would raise it's ugly head, although coming from Brueckner is a surprise, considering the depths of his own depravity.

Seems he's never heard of “Godwin’s Law”.  But good to see from his tone that his cage is metaphorically being well and truly rattled.

[Eleanor]

He wrote: “I’m wondering why people still ask me where I was on 3 May 2007.

“It is not on me to present evidence.  Ask the prosecutor in the same overkill way like it happens with me.

Seems there is absolutely no chance that he has an alibi for 3 May 2007.  Else why not just say who or what that may be? simple enough one might think.

On the other hand - I believe there may have been some thought given to the possibility that the abductor may have had an accomplice which might be concentrating minds a bit.

Almost certainly No Alibi, although in itself it isn't that important.  But what worries me is that Brueckner appears to have tried to set up a false Alibi.

[Mr Gray]

Wolters can't prove Brueckner actually abducted Maddie, or, that Maddie was ever abducted in the first place, so bit of a moot point really.

Yes he can.. Wait and see..

[Brietta]

Wolters can't prove Brueckner actually abducted Maddie, or, that Maddie was ever abducted in the first place, so bit of a moot point really.

Haven't you noticed how quiet it has been of late with only you and an ever dwindling band raising their heads above the parapet.
Anyone who has seen the evidence against Brueckner has been convinced by it, including the Policia Judiciaria.



The new evidence would confirm that Christian Brueckner - the main suspect of committing the abduction and then murdering the three-year-old girl - was responsible for her disappearance.
Last night, the Portuguese authorities confirmed that Brueckner had been declared a “formal suspect”.
https://www.infobae.com/en/2022/04/22/the-new-evidence-that-complicates-christian-brueckner-in-the-madeleine-mccann-case/

[Wonderfulspam]

Almost certainly No Alibi, although in itself it isn't that important.  But what worries me is that Brueckner appears to have tried to set up a false Alibi.

You think the girl who confirms Brueckner was with her in his van the same week Maddie disappeared was just saying that to help the murderer out?

I wonder why she'd want to do that?

[Wonderfulspam]

Haven't you noticed how quiet it has been of late with only you and an ever dwindling band raising their heads above the parapet.
Anyone who has seen the evidence against Brueckner has been convinced by it, including the Policia Judiciaria.



The new evidence would confirm that Christian Brueckner - the main suspect of committing the abduction and then murdering the three-year-old girl - was responsible for her disappearance.
Last night, the Portuguese authorities confirmed that Brueckner had been declared a “formal suspect”.
https://www.infobae.com/en/2022/04/22/the-new-evidence-that-complicates-christian-brueckner-in-the-madeleine-mccann-case/

Well, isn't that just swell, good for them. Now, lets see them either put up or shut up, as my hero & I keep challenging them to, for the past two years.

Shouldn't be much longer now.....

[Eleanor]

You think the girl who confirms Brueckner was with her in his van the same week Maddie disappeared was just saying that to help the murderer out?

I wonder why she'd want to do that?

But she didn't confirm it.

[Wonderfulspam]

But she didn't confirm it.

Not any precise time or date, but that week, at some points, she most certainly did.

Or, she lied to her husband, who then spread the lie to MWT, because she wanted to vouch for a rapist/paedophile/murderer, for some unspecified reason.

Sounds likely doesn't it.