Perceptions of Madeleine's Abduction

[G-Unit]

Is it your opinion that SY have looked at all these statements and ignored any discrepancies or do you think they just haven't looked at them

I got the impression they were looking for leads to follow rather than evaluating the evidence.

[Mr Gray]

Sonia Poultin has interviewed Perlin. She's sending a cioy of the interview to Boris.  She thinks this is evidence of an SY cover up... What an absolute idiot she is

[Mr Gray]

I got the impression they were looking for leads to follow rather than evaluating the evidence.

Then I'd say you have git the wrong impression and are totally mistaken.  Rowley said Re the mccanns.. Thst was dealt with by the first investigation.. WE'VE LOOKED. AT ALL THAT..

That's just from my memory.. Do ou think he's another liar

[Vertigo Swirl]

Sonia Poultin has interviewed Perlin. She's sending a cioy of the interview to Boris.  She thinks this is evidence of an SY cover up... What an absolute idiot she is

I'm sure the disappearance of Madeleine McCann will speed to the top of the Tories agenda now, over and above Ukraine, the COLC and the rest.  Thank God for Sonia "I Once Interviewed David Bowie" Poulton.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I got the impression they were looking for leads to follow rather than evaluating the evidence.

So when the Met said that they had forensically examined the timeline was that just a lie in your opinion?

[barrier]

What fun it is going to be when Brueckner gets arrested and charged.

This does not mean he will be found guilty.

There you go.  I've said it for you.

Is he going to be ?

[Eleanor]

Is he going to be ?

Probably.  Maybe.  Or not.  I don't much care anymore.  He certainly won't be able to wander around Europe unchecked.

[G-Unit]

Then I'd say you have git the wrong impression and are totally mistaken.  Rowley said Re the mccanns.. Thst was dealt with by the first investigation.. WE'VE LOOKED. AT ALL THAT..

That's just from my memory.. Do ou think he's another liar

...the involvement of the parents, that was dealt with at the time by the original investigation by the Portuguese. We had a look at all the material and we are happy that was all dealt with and there is no reason whatsoever to reopen that or start rumours that was a line of investigation
http://findmadeleine.com/pdf/ac-rowley-transcript.pdf

Rowley seems to be convinced that Madeleine was abducted, but that conviction wasn't shared by the Portuguese Prosecutors who recommended archiving the case. They had insufficient evidence to identify the crime or the perpetrator(s). So what, I wonder did SY find within the evidence which allowed them to do so?

[Eleanor]

...the involvement of the parents, that was dealt with at the time by the original investigation by the Portuguese. We had a look at all the material and we are happy that was all dealt with and there is no reason whatsoever to reopen that or start rumours that was a line of investigation
http://findmadeleine.com/pdf/ac-rowley-transcript.pdf

Rowley seems to be convinced that Madeleine was abducted, but that conviction wasn't shared by the Portuguese Prosecutors who recommended archiving the case. They had insufficient evidence to identify the crime or the perpetrator(s). So what, I wonder did SY find within the evidence which allowed them to do so?

More to the point, What didn't The Portuguese Prosecutor find?

[Vertigo Swirl]

...the involvement of the parents, that was dealt with at the time by the original investigation by the Portuguese. We had a look at all the material and we are happy that was all dealt with and there is no reason whatsoever to reopen that or start rumours that was a line of investigation
http://findmadeleine.com/pdf/ac-rowley-transcript.pdf

Rowley seems to be convinced that Madeleine was abducted, but that conviction wasn't shared by the Portuguese Prosecutors who recommended archiving the case. They had insufficient evidence to identify the crime or the perpetrator(s). So what, I wonder did SY find within the evidence which allowed them to do so?

Why do you think Rowley is convinced Madeleine was abducted?  Do you think he's ignorant or corrupt?  Why can't he see what you can so clearly see?
When the Met said that they had forensically examined the timeline was that just a lie in your opinion?

[G-Unit]

Why do you think Rowley is convinced Madeleine was abducted?  Do you think he's ignorant or corrupt?  Why can't he see what you can so clearly see?
When the Met said that they had forensically examined the timeline was that just a lie in your opinion?

Operation Grange was set up to investigate an abduction. Examining the timeline may show an opportunity for abduction, but that doesn't mean an abduction took place.

[Mr Gray]

...the involvement of the parents, that was dealt with at the time by the original investigation by the Portuguese. We had a look at all the material and we are happy that was all dealt with and there is no reason whatsoever to reopen that or start rumours that was a line of investigation
http://findmadeleine.com/pdf/ac-rowley-transcript.pdf

Rowley seems to be convinced that Madeleine was abducted, but that conviction wasn't shared by the Portuguese Prosecutors who recommended archiving the case. They had insufficient evidence to identify the crime or the perpetrator(s). So what, I wonder did SY find within the evidence which allowed them to do so?

We could start with the fact that according to the Portuguese the main evidence against the mccanns was the dog alerts.. SY would realise how stupid an idea that was

[Vertigo Swirl]

Operation Grange was set up to investigate an abduction. Examining the timeline may show an opportunity for abduction, but that doesn't mean an abduction took place.

Does that mean you now accept that there was an opportunity for an abduction having previously claimed such an event was virtually impossible?
Why do you think Rowley is convinced Madeleine was abducted?  Do you think he's ignorant or corrupt?  Why can't he see what you can so clearly see?

[G-Unit]

The point you all need to take note of is how exactly one police force managed to identify a crime when another was unable to do so. Was evidence withheld from the initial investigation?

[Vertigo Swirl]

The point you all need to take note of is how exactly one police force managed to identify a crime when another was unable to do so. Was evidence withheld from the initial investigation?

presumably by using the powers of logic and deduction which obviously the previous investigation had a shortage of.