Perceptions of Madeleine's Abduction

[Vertigo Swirl]

Indeed but the burning question is by who,  a stranger or not.

Definitely a stranger.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Lunchtime, Sunday, 29th April 2007.

NOT lunchtime, Thursday, 3rd May, as claimed.

Despite reporting this post and drawing it to G-Unit’s attention on the thread, no IMO added.  It’s official:  claiming opinion as fact is now tolerated on this forum.

[Eleanor]

Definitely a stranger.

Absolutely.

[Eleanor]

Despite reporting this post and drawing it to G-Unit’s attention on the thread, no IMO added.  It’s official:  claiming opinion as fact is now tolerated on this forum.

Actively encouraged I would say.

[Brietta]

Absolutely.

A stranger who only now has become the prime suspect of three police forces many years after the event because no-one with the exception of Madeleine's parents, bothered to look for him at the time or to even contemplate his existence.

[G-Unit]

Perhaps OG have allowed them sight of the video showing ?Madeleine that I sent in?

OG wasn't in existence when Judge Hogg made clear her views in 2008 when the McCanns were still arguidos.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/judge-plea-to-madeleine-mccanns-abductor-317135

[Brietta]

Despite reporting this post and drawing it to G-Unit’s attention on the thread, no IMO added.  It’s official:  claiming opinion as fact is now tolerated on this forum.

Mea culpa also.

The problem I had with it was one of interpretation.  Quite simply the post came over as unintelligible nonsense to me and if opinion the reference was totally lost on me.

[Brietta]

OG wasn't in existence when Judge Hogg made clear her views in 2008 when the McCanns were still arguidos.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/judge-plea-to-madeleine-mccanns-abductor-317135

Cool.

In which way does your post represent any reference to the thread title which remains ~ Perceptions of Madeleine's Abduction

[G-Unit]

Despite reporting this post and drawing it to G-Unit’s attention on the thread, no IMO added.  It’s official:  claiming opinion as fact is now tolerated on this forum.

There are many examples of opinion posted as fact on this forum, despite  efforts to eliminate the practice. Members neglect to add imo, and if asked for cites often refuse to provide them. I wonder why someone has suddenly decided
that this problem should be highlighted and enforced?

[Vertigo Swirl]

There are many examples of opinion posted as fact on this forum, despite  efforts to eliminate the practice. Members neglect to add imo, and if asked for cites often refuse to provide them. I wonder why someone has suddenly decided
that this problem should be highlighted and enforced?

I stopped doing so when I noticed you turning a blind eye to the rule breaking and will continue to do so all the while I see others like Spam and Blonk getting away with it.   Just so’s we’re clear - you don’t have a problem with it any more?

[G-Unit]

Cool.

In which way does your post represent any reference to the thread title which remains ~ Perceptions of Madeleine's Abduction

Judge Hogg's perception of Madeleine's abduction was clear. She believed wholeheartedly in the abduction and the parent's innocence. So what convinced her?

Despite the McCanns being suspects in Portugal, and the Assistant Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police saying of her parents;

While one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance.’

[Vertigo Swirl]

Judge Hogg's perception of Madeleine's abduction was clear. She believed wholeheartedly in the abduction and the parent's innocence. So what convinced her?

Despite the McCanns being suspects in Portugal, and the Assistant Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police saying of her parents;

While one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance.’

Her ability to use her undoubted high intelligence to deduce that the only plausible and logical explanation for Madeleine’s disappearance was a stranger abduction.

[G-Unit]

I stopped doing so when I noticed you turning a blind eye to the rule breaking and will continue to do so all the while I see others like Spam and Blonk getting away with it.   Just so’s we’re clear - you don’t have a problem with it any more?

Of course it's a problem, but while members disapprove of a rule it isn't easy. I don't think you were all that committed and supportive actually;

I have posted on numerous forums in the last 10years and this is the only one where posters MUST write IMO when expressing an opinion, or provide cites.  It’s also the only forum I’ve posted on where posters are punished with points for breaking the rules.

 Vertigo Swirl on August 15, 2018.

[Brietta]

Of course it's a problem, but while members disapprove of a rule it isn't easy. I don't think you were all that committed and supportive actually;

I have posted on numerous forums in the last 10years and this is the only one where posters MUST write IMO when expressing an opinion, or provide cites.  It’s also the only forum I’ve posted on where posters are punished with points for breaking the rules.

 Vertigo Swirl on August 15, 2018.

This is more deliberate  deflection from topic.

There are already areas for discussions of moderation and forum protocols which can be used - or new ones can be opened.

[Rossb]

They cleared bruckner without even speaking to him, how does one supposedly great police force do that?