Madeleine McCann suspect named as Christian Brueckner

[jassi]

Let's test that shall we.
What good reason is there to believe Maddie was abducted?
Is it because the McCanns said so?

It's logic, Jim. but not as we know it. 

[Eleanor]

It's logic, Jim. but not as we know it. 

Exactly.  You simply don't understand that The McCanns could not have disposed of the body of their daughter given the circumstances.

[jassi]

Exactly.  You simply don't understand that The McCanns could not have disposed of the body of their daughter given the circumstances.

How have you determined what the circumstances were ?

[Wonderfulspam]

It's logic, Jim. but not as we know it. 

That logical realm where Brueckner hid in the apartment during Gerry's check, messed around with the window & shutters, got clean away with his favourite fantasy of abducting, raping & murdering a child, then gave up doing abductions after that.  Just the one abduction & murder was enough for him, running a kiosk became more preferable thereafter.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You don't actually know anything, in fact. All you do is put your faith in others; first in OG and then in the Germans.

In which alternative world does demoting a prosecutor end up with him being a traffic cop? Wouldn't that only happen to a policeman? I don't know who told you that CB was going to sue Wolters. Wolters endangered his chances of getting a conviction by declaring his suspect guilty before he was even able to charge him. That's not something that involves the victim having to sue. Insulting others is no longer affective either - we all know it's a sign that the argument is being lost.

What argument do you think I have lost exactly?  Do you think I am wrong to call out those constantly repeating the same stupid questions on this forum day in, day out as petulant and childish?  What do you call it? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Ah, but he is worth listening to apparently because he matters. Even the PJ matter since CB was made an arguido. With (allegedly) three country's police forces working in harmony they can surely dredge up enough evidence to charge him? Or maybe not, in which case none of them matter, do they?

Do you know why HCW and the PJ and The Met are worth listening to, more so than you and the troll?  It's because they have access to far more information and evidence than you do - or do you think we should listen to you because you are better informed?  Seriously?

[Wonderfulspam]

How have you determined what the circumstances were ?

I guess she'd just have to take the McCanns word for them really.

I mean, I can't think of any other way, can you?

Yes, we can be 100% certain Maddie was definitely alive & in her bed that night, because the McCanns said she was & there's simply no possible alternative.

[Wonderfulspam]

Do you know why HCW and the PJ and The Met are worth listening to, more so than you and the troll?  It's because they have access to far more information and evidence than you do - or do you think we should listen to you because you are better informed?  Seriously?

....and how are they getting on with making the 'evidence' prove there actually was an abduction?

Abductor due in court anytime in the foreseeable future is he?

[Brietta]

Ah, but he is worth listening to apparently because he matters. Even the PJ matter since CB was made an arguido. With (allegedly) three country's police forces working in harmony they can surely dredge up enough evidence to charge him? Or maybe not, in which case none of them matter, do they?

That is an interesting turn of phrase "dredge up enough evidence" with reference to Brueckner and his crimes. Which seems to intimate a suggestion that there has been a long term vendetta conducted against him.

Brueckner is a long term career criminal of many talents and if you wish to swing with the notion of his victimisation please be my guest.
What I wish for you is that you never find yourself in a vulnerably helpless situation at the mercy of Brueckner or another of his ilk because I don't think they actually 'do' mercy.

What is it about the Portuguese making Brueckner an Arguido in Madeleine's case which seems to cause you irritation ... in fact don't bother answering that rhetorical question.
I know exactly why and the more you "dredge up" carping comments against those tasked with solving what happened to a missing child all those years ago - the better I like it.

[Brietta]

Exactly.  You simply don't understand that The McCanns could not have disposed of the body of their daughter given the circumstances.

Not even Amaral could conjure anything and it wasn't for the want of trying.

Brueckner on the other hand ticks all the boxes.  And the truly disgusting thing is that there were pointers available early in 2007 but nobody bothered to seek them out.

[Wonderfulspam]

Not even Amaral could conjure anything and it wasn't for the want of trying.

Brueckner on the other hand ticks all the boxes.  And the truly disgusting thing is that there were pointers available early in 2007 but nobody bothered to seek them out.

Pointers in 2007 such as what exactly?
You mean him allegedly confessing a year later?
Yes, Amaral should have known about that in advance really shouldn't he.

[Wonderfulspam]

P.S Brietta.
If you're planning on posting anymore articles about Brueckner, can you post the bit where Wolters talks about the evidential link between the Behan rape & Madeleine's abduction please?

[Brietta]

Pointers in 2007 such as what exactly?
You mean him allegedly confessing a year later?
Yes, Amaral should have known about that in advance really shouldn't he.

The PJ spent a lot of their time analysing McCann mobile phone traffic.  http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MOBILE_PHONE_ANALYSIS.htm
What a pity they didn't carry out similar diligences on the phones of known burglars and known paedophiles.  NO CRYSTAL BALLS REQUIRED - only competent policing.

Did anyone mention to you that Brueckner's phone activity is in evidence having been recently checked out.

[Eleanor]

How have you determined what the circumstances were ?

I amn't stupid.  We have seen it all at great length repeatedly and over and over.

[Wonderfulspam]

The PJ spent a lot of their time analysing McCann mobile phone traffic.  http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MOBILE_PHONE_ANALYSIS.htm
What a pity they didn't carry out similar diligences on the phones of known burglars and known paedophiles.  NO CRYSTAL BALLS REQUIRED - only competent policing.

Did anyone mention to you that Brueckner's phone activity is in evidence having been recently checked out.

I'm sorry, what does his half phone call prove exactly?
That he had a conversation?
Well that's not much use really is it.