Portuguese cop says the McCanns 'are still suspects'!

[G-Unit]

bump;

Quote from: Brietta on Today at 09:52:08 AM
Certainly those upholders of all things Portuguese good, bad or indifferent are making themselves look rather curious in their refusal to apply rules of the Portuguese constitution where the McCanns are concerned.

Which bit of the constitution do you think is applicable?

[The General]

Amaral has really shown himself up in all his recent publicised utterances and none more so than in his most recent; although I thought his lies concerning an active criminal investigation took some beating.

He obviously has no intention of retiring from the limelight which probably makes it well overdue for him to be treated with the forensic scrutiny he obviously deserves.

It's just too lucrative for him to retire to anywhere. This latest in a series of victories has secured 'work', such as it is as he merely has to turn up and talk, stretching off in to the foreseeable. He might even pay his brother back, if he can be arsed. CHUUURRRR CCHHIINNGG!!
He deserves it, the way that spiteful pair have treated him.

[Angelo222]

Amaral has really shown himself up in all his recent publicised utterances and none more so than in his most recent; although I thought his lies concerning an active criminal investigation took some beating.

He obviously has no intention of retiring from the limelight which probably makes it well overdue for him to be treated with the forensic scrutiny he obviously deserves.

If you are looking for anyone to blame for Amaral still being in the limelight then look no further than Maddie's parents. Had they not raised the various legal actions against him, he would have disappeared into obscurity.

And now that he has won the cases they raised his profile is as high as ever again!

Anyone hear anything from that nasty pair, the Cipriano duo, recently?

[Eleanor]

It's just too lucrative for him to retire to anywhere. This latest in a series of victories has secured 'work', such as it is as he merely has to turn up and talk, stretching off in to the foreseeable. He might even pay his brother back, if he can be arsed. CHUUURRRR CCHHIINNGG!!
He deserves it, the way that spiteful pair have treated him.

Paying his brother back would be a good thing.  Money awarded against him in a court case in 2003ish.

[Eleanor]

If you are looking for anyone to blame for Amaral still being in the limelight then look no further than Maddie's parents. Had they not raised the various legal actions against him, he would have disappeared into obscurity.

And now that he has won the cases they raised his profile is as high as ever again!

Nothing to do with Bruckner and The Dreadlocks I suppose.

[Angelo222]

Nothing to do with Bruckner and The Dreadlocks I suppose.

Bruckner is just a patsy, like those other patsies, dead or alive that the cops attempted to frame for Maddie's murder.

[The General]

Paying his brother back would be a good thing.  Money awarded against him in a court case in 2003ish.

I shoe-horned that little line in there as a preemptive strike, knowing the mentality of the average supporter.
The dirt digging exercise yielded a meagre haul if that's all that's left; along with the Leonor getting a kicking off inmates episode.

[Mr Gray]

Bruckner is just a patsy, like those other patsies, dead or alive.

No he's guilty of murdering Maddie... I can say that based on police statements which according to the ECHR judgment make it a fact

[Brietta]

Which bit of the constitution do you think is applicable?

Who was the first person to be declared as being an arguido in the Madeline McCann investigation?
Robert Murat, an Anglo-Portuguese property developer who lived 100 yards from where Madeleine disappeared and who helped in the initial search, was made an arguido after detectives took him in for questioning.

Murat was formally cleared of suspicion in 2008 and won damages for defamatory reports of his involvement in the disappearance.

How was it used in relation to Kate and Gerry McCann?
Kate McCann, Madeleine’s mother, was formally declared an arguida on 7 September 2007, after 10 hours of questioning by Portuguese police. Gerry McCann was given arguido status the following day after further police questioning.

It wasn’t until July 2008, after Portuguese police had submitted their final report, that both parents were formally cleared by the Portuguese authorities of involvement in their daughter’s disappearance.

“It is hard to describe how utterly despairing it was to be named arguidos and subsequently portrayed in the media as suspects in our own daughter’s abduction,” said Kate McCann, who added it had been “equally devastating to witness the detrimental effect” it had on the search for her daughter.

What are the circumstances of the latest designation of arguido status?
Brückner, a convicted rapist identified as a murder suspect by German prosecutors in June 2020, has been formally identified as a suspect by Portuguese authorities.

The timing of the move could be related to Portugal’s 15-year statute of limitations for crimes with a maximum prison sentence of 10 years or more. Madeleine disappeared on 3 May 2007, while on holiday with her parents in Praia da Luz in Portugal.

What are the legal and practical implications of the status?
In practical terms, a person has to be declared an arguido before they can be arrested and the approach of investigators to interviews typically shifts if someone’s status changes from being a witness.

Once a case file is completed, the police pass it to the public ministry, the equivalent of the Crown Prosecution Service, which decides whether an acusaçao or indictment is brought.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/apr/22/madeleine-mccann-case-what-does-christian-brueckner-arguido-status-mean

Do you want me to go through it and explain it all to you in debating terms or do you think you'll be able to read it all through for yourself.
Bearing in mind that Murat and the McCanns were absolved from blame in 2008;  did anyone give any assurances for the later consignment in particular as we are informed that due to the statute of limitations - Brueckner will be the last.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Bruckner is just a patsy, like those other patsies, dead or alive that the cops attempted to frame for Maddie's murder.

so who did it then?  You seem very sure of yourself.

[Brietta]

bump;

Quote from: Brietta on Today at 09:52:08 AM
Certainly those upholders of all things Portuguese good, bad or indifferent are making themselves look rather curious in their refusal to apply rules of the Portuguese constitution where the McCanns are concerned.

Which bit of the constitution do you think is applicable?

bump;

Who was the first person to be declared as being an arguido in the Madeline McCann investigation?
Robert Murat, an Anglo-Portuguese property developer who lived 100 yards from where Madeleine disappeared and who helped in the initial search, was made an arguido after detectives took him in for questioning.

Murat was formally cleared of suspicion in 2008 and won damages for defamatory reports of his involvement in the disappearance.

How was it used in relation to Kate and Gerry McCann?
Kate McCann, Madeleine’s mother, was formally declared an arguida on 7 September 2007, after 10 hours of questioning by Portuguese police. Gerry McCann was given arguido status the following day after further police questioning.

It wasn’t until July 2008, after Portuguese police had submitted their final report, that both parents were formally cleared by the Portuguese authorities of involvement in their daughter’s disappearance.

“It is hard to describe how utterly despairing it was to be named arguidos and subsequently portrayed in the media as suspects in our own daughter’s abduction,” said Kate McCann, who added it had been “equally devastating to witness the detrimental effect” it had on the search for her daughter.

What are the circumstances of the latest designation of arguido status?
Brückner, a convicted rapist identified as a murder suspect by German prosecutors in June 2020, has been formally identified as a suspect by Portuguese authorities.

The timing of the move could be related to Portugal’s 15-year statute of limitations for crimes with a maximum prison sentence of 10 years or more. Madeleine disappeared on 3 May 2007, while on holiday with her parents in Praia da Luz in Portugal.

What are the legal and practical implications of the status?
In practical terms, a person has to be declared an arguido before they can be arrested and the approach of investigators to interviews typically shifts if someone’s status changes from being a witness.

Once a case file is completed, the police pass it to the public ministry, the equivalent of the Crown Prosecution Service, which decides whether an acusaçao or indictment is brought.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/apr/22/madeleine-mccann-case-what-does-christian-brueckner-arguido-status-mean

Do you want me to go through it and explain it all to you in debating terms or do you think you'll be able to read it all through for yourself.
Bearing in mind that Murat and the McCanns were absolved from blame in 2008;  did anyone give any assurances for the later consignment in particular as we are informed that due to the statute of limitations - Brueckner will be the last.

[G-Unit]

Who was the first person to be declared as being an arguido in the Madeline McCann investigation?
Robert Murat, an Anglo-Portuguese property developer who lived 100 yards from where Madeleine disappeared and who helped in the initial search, was made an arguido after detectives took him in for questioning.

Murat was formally cleared of suspicion in 2008 and won damages for defamatory reports of his involvement in the disappearance.

How was it used in relation to Kate and Gerry McCann?
Kate McCann, Madeleine’s mother, was formally declared an arguida on 7 September 2007, after 10 hours of questioning by Portuguese police. Gerry McCann was given arguido status the following day after further police questioning.

It wasn’t until July 2008, after Portuguese police had submitted their final report, that both parents were formally cleared by the Portuguese authorities of involvement in their daughter’s disappearance.

“It is hard to describe how utterly despairing it was to be named arguidos and subsequently portrayed in the media as suspects in our own daughter’s abduction,” said Kate McCann, who added it had been “equally devastating to witness the detrimental effect” it had on the search for her daughter.

What are the circumstances of the latest designation of arguido status?
Brückner, a convicted rapist identified as a murder suspect by German prosecutors in June 2020, has been formally identified as a suspect by Portuguese authorities.

The timing of the move could be related to Portugal’s 15-year statute of limitations for crimes with a maximum prison sentence of 10 years or more. Madeleine disappeared on 3 May 2007, while on holiday with her parents in Praia da Luz in Portugal.

What are the legal and practical implications of the status?
In practical terms, a person has to be declared an arguido before they can be arrested and the approach of investigators to interviews typically shifts if someone’s status changes from being a witness.

Once a case file is completed, the police pass it to the public ministry, the equivalent of the Crown Prosecution Service, which decides whether an acusaçao or indictment is brought.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/apr/22/madeleine-mccann-case-what-does-christian-brueckner-arguido-status-mean

Do you want me to go through it and explain it all to you in debating terms or do you think you'll be able to read it all through for yourself.
Bearing in mind that Murat and the McCanns were absolved from blame in 2008;  did anyone give any assurances for the later consignment in particular as we are informed that due to the statute of limitations - Brueckner will be the last.

I don't see any mention of the constitution?

[Angelo222]

No he's guilty of murdering Maddie... I can say that based on police statements which according to the ECHR judgment make it a fact

I think you've totally lost it now Davel.

[Brietta]

If you are looking for anyone to blame for Amaral still being in the limelight then look no further than Maddie's parents. Had they not raised the various legal actions against him, he would have disappeared into obscurity.

And now that he has won the cases they raised his profile is as high as ever again!

Anyone hear anything from that nasty pair, the Cipriano duo, recently?

Amaral has no intention of 'retiring' for as long as he sees there is danger of police criminal investigations running the risk of actually finding out what happened to Madeleine McCann and who is responsible for it.

He was forced to break cover on Saunokonoko's 2019 podcast in an effort to derail the investigation into Brueckner.

My opinion is that Amaral is a very worried man.

[Eleanor]

Amaral has no intention of 'retiring' for as long as he sees there is danger of police criminal investigations running the risk of actually finding out what happened to Madeleine McCann and who is responsible for it.

He was forced to break cover on Saunokonoko's 2019 podcast in an effort to derail the investigation into Brueckner.

My opinion is that Amaral is a very worried man.

I think Amaral needs seriously looking into.