Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance.

[G-Unit]

Can we discuss Murat’s possible motive?  He’s not proven innocent so it wouldn’t be a slur to discuss it would it?

You can discuss whatever interests you, no need to ask my permission.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You can discuss whatever interests you, no need to ask my permission.

So speculation about Murat’s possible motives is fine by you?  Just wanted to check before I start speculating wildly about his possible connections with the Russian Mafia, his strange sexual kinks, his inconsistent statements etc. None of this would be seen as a slur I take it?

[G-Unit]

So speculation about Murat’s possible motives is fine by you?  Just wanted to check before I start speculating wildly about his possible connections with the Russian Mafia, his strange sexual kinks, his inconsistent statements etc. None of this would be seen as a slur I take it?

As long as it's within forum rules go ahead. I'm sure someone will be interested.

[Mr Gray]

It is indeed a stupid suggestion, but not one made by me. So do you have anything to contribute to my question? 'why should any mention of parental motive be seen as a 'slur'?'

You posted..
They were official suspects in the case and have never managed to prove that they are innocent.

So it's a stupid post made by yourself and confirmed by yourself

[barrier]

So speculation about Murat’s possible motives is fine by you?  Just wanted to check before I start speculating wildly about his possible connections with the Russian Mafia, his strange sexual kinks, his inconsistent statements etc. None of this would be seen as a slur I take it?

Well it wasn't a slur on CB even before being made an arguido.

[G-Unit]

Well it wasn't a slur on CB even before being made an arguido.

No-one wants to discuss 'slurs' it seems.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No-one wants to discuss 'slurs' it seems.

I don’t think you understand the meaning of the word frankly.  If I start suggesting ascribing motives to Murat such as child trafficking or paedophilia that would clear be a slur, and I doubt he would take very kindly to such slurs.  If an ex-cop were to write a book full of outlandish speculation about Murat’s possible motives such as the ones I have already mentioned  I would expect him to sue.  Why wouldn’t he?  It would very obviously be a massive SLUR. 

[G-Unit]

I don’t think you understand the meaning of the word frankly.  If I start suggesting ascribing motives to Murat such as child trafficking or paedophilia that would clear be a slur, and I doubt he would take very kindly to such slurs.  If an ex-cop were to write a book full of outlandish speculation about Murat’s possible motives such as the ones I have already mentioned  I would expect him to sue.  Why wouldn’t he?  It would very obviously be a massive SLUR.

How about pointing out that IF he was involved his motive might have been that he would have lost everything IF he'd been caught?

[Vertigo Swirl]

How about pointing out that IF he was involved his motive might have been that he would have lost everything IF he'd been caught?

That doesn’t make any sense.  His motive for removing Madeleine was that he’d lose everything if he got caught?  What are you on about? 

[Brietta]

Well it wasn't a slur on CB even before being made an arguido.

Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance?

The paedophile and rapist with no alibi for the night Madeleine was abducted has gathered quite a following amongst sceptics on this forum.

Even current slang usage sums it up - How SICK is that!

[Mr Gray]

How about pointing out that IF he was involved his motive might have been that he would have lost everything IF he'd been caught?

The McCanns only have a motive if they were involved.. So the discussion only exists if you are implicating the mccanns. Doesnt bother me but its defamatory and therefore against forum rules... Which you seem to think important when it suits you

[Brietta]

No-one wants to discuss 'slurs' it seems.

Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance?

How do you suppose it is possible to "slur" a convicted career criminal, rapist and a paedophile.
The sceptics on the Madeleine board are certainly following your example in totally ignoring posting as per thread topic.

[Brietta]

That doesn’t make any sense.  His motive for removing Madeleine was that he’d lose everything if he got caught?  What are you on about?

Certainly absolutely nothing which relates to the thread topic "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance."

[Brietta]

The McCanns only have a motive if they were involved.. So the discussion only exists if you are implicating the mccanns. Doesnt bother me but its defamatory and therefore against forum rules... Which you seem to think important when it suits you

My opinion is that sums up entirely the raison d'etre of this thread "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance." and what has been posted to date confirms that.

For discussion the choice can only be SLUR v INAPPRPRIATNESS.  Dear Lord! who in their right minds tries to initiate discussion specifically on the motive in the disappearance of a child?

[G-Unit]

The McCanns only have a motive if they were involved.. So the discussion only exists if you are implicating the mccanns. Doesnt bother me but its defamatory and therefore against forum rules... Which you seem to think important when it suits you

I'm not implicating the McCanns; that happened when the PJ made them arguidos.